PDA

View Full Version : Can anyone stand Collingwood for BD?


Shafin
March 2, 2006, 02:42 AM
PD Collingwood (RHB) 122 246 10 4 49.59



England 381/9 (125.4 ov)

Current Partnership[10 th wicket]: 54 runs, 14.1 overs, RR: 3.81

Ishtylish cricketer
March 2, 2006, 07:34 AM
Yes that would have to be JO. He's the only guy capable of playing reponsibly.

Tigers_eye
March 2, 2006, 11:24 AM
And yet some BC members cry for SR, or make a big deal of SR in test cricket. Yes, it may be flashy and entertaining to see Afridi-Shewag like batting however Five day game has not cut short. Modern day test cricket players must learn how to curtail their temptation and stop puting their team into an embarrassing position. Nafiz Iqbal (both innings), JO, S Nafees (1st Innings), Ash (2nd innings). Test cricket is a game of patience and not like ODI or 20/20.

Spitfire_x86
March 2, 2006, 03:19 PM
Originally posted by Ishtylish cricketer
Yes that would have to be JO. He's the only guy capable of playing reponsibly.
The last one would be JO. He's the most incompetent batsman in our side.

Cricket46
March 2, 2006, 05:15 PM
Sorry for my ignorance, what is SR? Is it scoring rate? Or is that a player's initials?

Fazal
March 2, 2006, 05:20 PM
Originally posted by Cricket46
Sorry for my ignorance, what is SR? Is it scoring rate? Or is that a player's initials?

Yes its scoring rate. For example if a player scores 5 runs in 10 balls, his SR will be 50

Cricket46
March 2, 2006, 05:25 PM
The intial post is not obvious. The columns headers should have been there. Something like this, I guess:

Runs Mts. 4s 6s SR
PD Collingwood (RHB) 122 246 10 4 49.59

Cricket46
March 2, 2006, 05:50 PM
Wow, I just can't align properly.

------------------------- Runs Balls 4s 6s SR
PD Collingwood (RHB) 122 246 10 4 49.59

reverse_swing
March 2, 2006, 06:09 PM
Originally posted by Cricket46
Sorry for my ignorance, what is SR? Is it scoring rate? Or is that a player's initials?

more about SR (Strike Rate) from Wiki>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strike_rate)

Cricket46
March 2, 2006, 06:14 PM
Right! It is strike rate and NOT scoring rate. I don't know how I missed that. I know that these are per 100 balls played. But my question was primarily that the opening post was not clear, at least to me.