PDA

View Full Version : Do we need JO to survive 50 overs in the ODIs?


FagunerAgun
December 26, 2007, 11:18 AM
We may not need JO as an opening batsman in the ODIs but we can surely use him as a 'reliable' batsman in case there is a typical BD collapse to rally up support for the 'typical BD big hitters'. Even though his scoring is low but with him we will have more opportunity for surviving 50 overs with dignity.

What do you think guys?

Cheers.

Tigers_eye
December 26, 2007, 11:21 AM
no!! His service at intl matches is not needed (at this point).

AsifTheManRahman
December 26, 2007, 11:22 AM
We need the middle order to take on some responsibility, that's all. We had the foundation today - the top order gave us a good start, and even Ash coming in at #4 played his role. However, the guys coming in later did not deliver what was expected of them.

BanCricFan
December 26, 2007, 11:30 AM
A BIG NO!!!

We just have to find a way to fix our "collapsable" midle order. JO is not that solution. Gladly, I don't think JO is in JS's picture at all. We need a rejuvinated Alok in the midle!

Omio
December 26, 2007, 12:00 PM
noooooooooooooooooooo

Moshin
December 26, 2007, 12:06 PM
Yes we need Javed Omar in the top order definetly
he's the who i fink can handle the pressure
i mean just look at the score guys, terrible.
probably 3 atleast in the order!

arafath79
December 26, 2007, 12:32 PM
JO or Rajin Saleh would be 1000 times better option than moksed Mehrab Jnr.

Mahmood
December 26, 2007, 12:33 PM
RIght now, we have no middle order. Mushfiq is totally off form. Forhad and Mehrab should never have been selected.

I would definitly pick Javed and Rajin ahead of these players.

FagunerAgun
December 26, 2007, 12:56 PM
I agree.
Additionally, in the last few ODIs, JO rr was over 4.

zainab
December 26, 2007, 02:29 PM
RIght now, we have no middle order. Mushfiq is totally off form. Forhad and Mehrab should never have been selected.

I would definitly pick Javed and Rajin ahead of these players.

I agree, but Farhad should stay and given another chance.

Murad
December 26, 2007, 02:40 PM
Naaa we are happy if we can play till 40 overs and still can make 200+ score. JO will make the game boring..

I heard hes getting dropped from the Test team. I read it in Prothom-Alo yesterday.

Spitfire_x86
December 26, 2007, 02:46 PM
How do we improve as an ODI team? By playing one of the worst rotators of strike in the middle order. Greatest idea ever!!!

arafath79
December 26, 2007, 03:43 PM
edited

arafath79
December 26, 2007, 03:43 PM
I agree, but Farhad should stay and given another chance.

Yes, Farhad should get more chances to play in ODI for Bd team. He is still inexperience lad but I am impressed with his bowling speed. He is just around 5'7 - 5'8 tall but he can bowl with the speed of 131-134 mph consistently. He just need to improve in both batting and bowling and learn quickly.

Shobha
December 26, 2007, 03:53 PM
TO SURVIVE 50 OVERS? YES
TO MAKE A DECENT SCORE? NO

All our tigers our very impatient and restless with the bat and regularly get bowled out before 50 overs which is not just embarassing but also a bad example in the name of cricket. And we all know that belim is one player who literally falls asleep on the pitch so maybe it wont be such a bad idea to put him in. the question is where does he go in the order???

al Furqaan
December 26, 2007, 06:02 PM
Noooo

Antora
December 26, 2007, 06:22 PM
no.

damalChele
December 26, 2007, 06:23 PM
We need Rajin Saleh instead of JO

nobody
December 27, 2007, 12:44 AM
How do we improve as an ODI team? By playing one of the worst rotators of strike in the middle order. Greatest idea ever!!!
Post of the thread.

Nocturnal
December 27, 2007, 01:56 AM
nope

tonoy
December 27, 2007, 02:54 AM
oh that was a good joke. seriously, you feel ok?

Sohel
December 27, 2007, 03:10 AM
The "Myth of Golla" continues ... :)

WarWolf
December 27, 2007, 05:15 AM
OMG!!!!OMG!!!OMG!!! How can you even think of this? Nooooo wayyyyyyy.

(I hope antora won't mind:-p)

nzfan
December 27, 2007, 05:18 AM
He can't be as bad as Rahul Dravid batted today, his strike rate was nearly negative

Sovik
December 27, 2007, 05:48 AM
no. we don't need him. even if he could see off the new ball and we play full 50 overs, because of his slow batting our middle order batsmen will be in pressure to score quickly and eventually we will just cross 200. so it won't be any different from now

yaseer
December 27, 2007, 05:51 AM
"Do we need JO to survive 50 overs in the ODIs?"
NO