PDA

View Full Version : plz vote for rubel


naz_ca
October 27, 2009, 08:26 AM
Plz everyone out there, vote for the removal of rubel form our national team. He is one of the worst bowlers produced by our country. I was never his fan even when he took 4 wcts against lanka but thereafter he is costing us match after match.

I have always noticed that when we all talk of removing a player here in bc, it has worked. Haba,chacha,tapas,mehrab are few examples.

thanks in advance:D

AsifTheManRahman
October 27, 2009, 09:05 AM
Give him more time to develop his game. He's too raw, especially for Test cricket.

As for this ODI series, Nazmul would have been my pick to accompany Dollar.

_Rafi_
October 27, 2009, 09:18 AM
The blame goes to selectors. Why they are selecting him for national team instead of Academy team or A team.
Rubel must go to Academy and need to learn a lot of things to be a better bowler. Nazmul hossain improved a lot from playing for Academy team.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Tigers_eye
October 27, 2009, 09:24 AM
The blame goes to selectors. Why they are selecting him for national team instead of Academy team or A team.
Rubel must go to Academy and need to learn a lot of things to be a better bowler. Nazmul hossain improved a lot from playing for Academy team.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
lol, I can dig up threads where fans were fast tracking him to WI instead of England. Those guilty would still try to defend their stance as they did at that time.

M.H.Rubel
October 27, 2009, 09:25 AM
Plz everyone out there, vote for the removal of rubel form our national team. He is one of the worst bowlers produced by our country. I was never his fan even when he took 4 wcts against lanka but thereafter he is costing us match after match.

I have always noticed that when we all talk of removing a player here in bc, it has worked. Haba,chacha,tapas,mehrab are few examples.

thanks in advance:D

Taking in the square and making debu of Rubel was a mistake.He need to play more and more domestic cricket.He can not control his line,how can he be a strike bowler?
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

M.H.Rubel
October 27, 2009, 09:26 AM
The blame goes to selectors. Why they are selecting him for national team instead of Academy team or A team.
Rubel must go to Academy and need to learn a lot of things to be a better bowler. Nazmul hossain improved a lot from playing for Academy team.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Thats correct
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

One World
October 27, 2009, 09:30 AM
Where is Sazidul?

Roni_uk
October 27, 2009, 11:56 AM
i voted last year afetr bd v sl match (BC was hot in favour of him then) but no body listens. Now he is staying on and making us lose or making us difficult to win matches.

kmasum
October 27, 2009, 04:37 PM
Was never a fan of him..he bowled silly.. Nazmul better choic for sure
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Fazal
October 27, 2009, 04:51 PM
Vote for Rubel?

Is he running for President or what?

nycpro96
October 27, 2009, 04:53 PM
give him some time

jeesh
October 27, 2009, 10:32 PM
I wouldnt be so harsh. Blame should go to the selectors for bringing him on so early.

Imteaz
October 27, 2009, 10:49 PM
No Comments. :lol:

billah
October 27, 2009, 11:58 PM
Rubel is nothing short of a gem. A diamond in the rough.

19 years 300 days. Bangladesh has never before produced a pacer with so much raw juice, that was able to keep himself injury-free. He is well-built, somewhat flamboyant and aggressive. All the qualities that are needed in a killer.

I wish him all the best. Hope he turns out to be our next Mash.

I vote against this kind of threads.

al Furqaan
October 28, 2009, 12:08 AM
rubel had figures of 1-58 = BAD.

however, the way he bowled, with the slightest of improvement his figures would effectively be 3-46, far better looking and sounding. he got coventry out, then couple balls later had coventry dropped in the slips. and of course he got that wicket he got. the two sixes came of free hits, and just tinkering a few things would make him a vastly better player. agreed that his line is a bit erratic, offers too much width every other ball, but those things can be fixed in a 19 year old. his pace, ball for ball, when the gun was working, was better than jarvis' who is genuinely quick by all accounts. he can reverse it, he can swing it, and he can hit the batsmen and beat them for pace. he has all the tools and ingredients. right now he may be ordinary, but you let these guys play and learn. rubel will be the real deal.

kalpurush
October 28, 2009, 12:53 AM
Rubel is nothing short of a gem. A diamond in the rough.

19 years 300 days. Bangladesh has never before produced a pacer with so much raw juice, that was able to keep himself injury-free. He is well-built, somewhat flamboyant and aggressive. All the qualities that are needed in a killer.

I wish him all the best. Hope he turns out to be our next Mash.

I vote against this kind of threads.

rubel had figures of 1-58 = BAD.

however, the way he bowled, with the slightest of improvement his figures would effectively be 3-46, far better looking and sounding. he got coventry out, then couple balls later had coventry dropped in the slips. and of course he got that wicket he got. the two sixes came of free hits, and just tinkering a few things would make him a vastly better player. agreed that his line is a bit erratic, offers too much width every other ball, but those things can be fixed in a 19 year old. his pace, ball for ball, when the gun was working, was better than jarvis' who is genuinely quick by all accounts. he can reverse it, he can swing it, and he can hit the batsmen and beat them for pace. he has all the tools and ingredients. right now he may be ordinary, but you let these guys play and learn. rubel will be the real deal.
All we, the fans (including myself) need is patience.
RBX will shine in due times. :)

raf-stah
October 28, 2009, 01:08 AM
all this natrual potential n talent....all fading away. thnx to man management

auntu
October 28, 2009, 03:05 AM
At first I thought he is having any sort of election....Upozilla or Union porishad...:)

Anyways thanks for the joke. :D

smithgary
October 28, 2009, 05:32 AM
rubel had figures of 1-58 = BAD.

however, the way he bowled, with the slightest of improvement his figures would effectively be 3-46, far better looking and sounding. he got coventry out, then couple balls later had coventry dropped in the slips. and of course he got that wicket he got. the two sixes came of free hits, and just tinkering a few things would make him a vastly better player. agreed that his line is a bit erratic, offers too much width every other ball, but those things can be fixed in a 19 year old. his pace, ball for ball, when the gun was working, was better than jarvis' who is genuinely quick by all accounts. he can reverse it, he can swing it, and he can hit the batsmen and beat them for pace. he has all the tools and ingredients. right now he may be ordinary, but you let these guys play and learn. rubel will be the real deal.

Hi dude,

I am agree and appritiate with u, I have same thoughts so my reply is same like al Furqan, Thanks for sharing such a nice information..

fuzzy
October 28, 2009, 06:07 AM
he made us lose many times... he not good bowlar just peace not cleaver...plz remove him..