PDA

View Full Version : Why did Shafiul even play?


Rommel
February 28, 2010, 01:45 PM
I fail to understand why you draft a guy into your XI but yet give him no chance to even play. He only bowled 2 overs and conceded 11 runs, which by the way England were going early, is pretty damn good. But yet, we took him off and never let him come back. If you don't want to use pace, then why not bring in another spinner like Shuvo?

1RParker
February 28, 2010, 01:51 PM
Completely agree!

Haradhon
February 28, 2010, 01:57 PM
I fail to understand why you draft a guy into your XI but yet give him no chance to even play. He only bowled 2 overs and conceded 11 runs, which by the way England were going early, is pretty damn good. But yet, we took him off and never let him come back. If you don't want to use pace, then why not bring in another spinner like Shuvo?
Well, you need two pacers to open anyway. Are you saying we use a spinner on the other end for the 2nd over? At this time Shafiul seems to be our 2nd best, as Rajib is inconsistent with length and line, and Rubal gets hit.
I would rather replace either Zunaed or Aftab to afford Shuvo, hoping he know how to bat

FagunerAgun
February 28, 2010, 01:59 PM
I fail to understand why you draft a guy into your XI but yet give him no chance to even play. He only bowled 2 overs and conceded 11 runs, which by the way England were going early, is pretty damn good. But yet, we took him off and never let him come back. If you don't want to use pace, then why not bring in another spinner like Shuvo?
Make sense but I wonder was he injured!

chol_bd123
February 28, 2010, 02:18 PM
Well, you need two pacers to open anyway. Are you saying we use a spinner on the other end for the 2nd over? At this time Shafiul seems to be our 2nd best, as Rajib is inconsistent with length and line, and Rubal gets hit.
I would rather replace either Zunaed or Aftab to afford Shuvo, hoping he know how to bat

that doesn't make any sense either. I would rather have a spinner open the bowling then to bring a fast-bowler and use him for only two overs

chol_bd123
February 28, 2010, 02:57 PM
the only explanation is that Shakib forgot about him. The team plan was to utilize the spinners as they had they best chance to get wickets. SO Sakib was thinking about which spinner to put on next everytime. MAshrafe was put on in the end because he needs practice and to burn calories

Rommel
February 28, 2010, 02:58 PM
if thats the case, then Shuvo should have played instead of Shafiul...

Beamer
February 28, 2010, 03:09 PM
I have a few whys?

Why did Shafi even play?
Why did we play an unfit Mash over Rubel?
Why is Siddons being so stubborn with Zunaid and making him a no.3 ( In tests, he has done decent, but for ODIs, no.3 is just not him )?

The line-up we produced was a losing one to begin with. No.3 and No.4, two most critical slots for any batting line up are always occupied by our most shaky batsmen on confidence. As a result, the good starts provided by Tamim are losing momentum. I don't think both Aftab and Zunaid are suited to play. One has to go, or both hopefully from the ODI side. Aftab at least has some resume in ODI's and at no.3, but Zunaid has none.

Including Mash and Raj was a mistake.

deshifan
February 28, 2010, 03:13 PM
Shafiul played because some people think he is best fast bowler Bangladesh have ever produced in terms of variations.

Peace
February 28, 2010, 06:02 PM
I do not think that there was anything wrong with bowling department today. We had only 228 runs to defend; so there was no much room for bowlers to concede more than 4.5 runs per over. Shakib’s decisions were also justified because of the fact that he had to change bowlers before it was too late.

I also do not understand why BCB arranges day/night match if we want to play at our strength (spin). Spin bowling is not effective at all if we lose toss and bowl in the evening due to dew factor. Our strength should have been tested without the risk of dew factor playing a part.

Tiger444
February 28, 2010, 06:07 PM
Good thread Rommel..why did we under bowl shafiul and overbowl mash? Mash has come back after soo long and hes already had the pressure 2 bowl so much? Shafiul has done well recently and has been in rhythm so he shouldve bowled more then mash..hopefully shakib doesnt make the same mistake again..

Gowza
February 28, 2010, 06:33 PM
reminds me of when shahadat was a regular in the one-day team but would never be bowled his full 10 overs and often bowled 6 or less. it is a good thread, you only play players that you're going to use.

reyme
February 28, 2010, 06:34 PM
Why are blaming Shakib? He has to play the lineup and the so called strategy he got from his coach.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition (iPhone)

Fazal
February 28, 2010, 06:44 PM
Yes it doesn't make sense at all. If you select a specialized bowler, he should be part of your bowling game plan. Now if think a specialized bowler is not part of your bowling game plan, then why you select him in the first place? Selection and then not using him doesn't make sense at all these two are contradictory decision. One have to be wrong. i.e either selecting him or not using him. And there lies the gap between slecting the team and the game-plan devised for the team.

NKVD
February 28, 2010, 08:00 PM
Why do you guys now have Shafiul inder the scope ? You guys are just too much.

HE was chosen on just merit, and the capt chose to fast track to spin - that's all.

Tiger444
February 28, 2010, 08:16 PM
Why do you guys now have Shafiul inder the scope ? You guys are just too much.

HE was chosen on just merit, and the capt chose to fast track to spin - that's all.

NKVD, read what people are saying before jumping in2 conclusions..assumptions like this can trigger arguments..the starter of the thread, rommel says why was shafiul included? He bowled only 2 overs..whats the point of picking a bowler and have him bowl just 2 overs..he's not criticizing shafiul but rather shakib..if you pick a bowler wouldnt u want 2 bowl him more then just 2 overs? If shakib is reluctant 2 bowl him then bring in shuvo because he seemed 2 like 2 use the spinners..i think he deserves 2 be in the team but should be used more then just 2 overs..

Peace
February 28, 2010, 08:26 PM
This thread is getting funnier- communication catastrophe.

Jesus87
February 28, 2010, 08:57 PM
The English batsmen were playing our pacers Mash and Shaf's (two over) with ease. When it came to spinner they stuggled against the likes of Shakib, Naem and Mahmu, Shak did the right thing as he wanted to pick up a few wickets and build pressure. I know he should have used Shafiul instead of Msahrafee, he looked way unfit for international cricket, needs to lose atleast 15 pounds of his belly. But hopefully Shakib will have a better gameplan in the next match and hope Mash doesn't get selected along with Aftab and Big Z.

al-Sagar
February 28, 2010, 09:55 PM
yesterday BD introduced there 5th bowlers as early as 7th over when naeem was introduced in the 8th over.

earlier the overs from shafiul and mash did not give any problem to english openers and shakib in the 3rd over caused kieswetter some problems and then shakib tried all his spinners as early as possible and shakib and naeem then had good spells and he also expected riadh and razzak to continue the same but did not happen.

from what i saw from the stands that the english were very comfortable against our pace in this batting paradise whee 275+ should have been a good score and with some support to tamim we were poised for 300 yesterday.

well its all now history. good luck tomorrow

NKVD
February 28, 2010, 10:11 PM
NKVD, read what people are saying before jumping in2 conclusions..assumptions like this can trigger arguments..the starter of the thread, rommel says why was shafiul included? He bowled only 2 overs..whats the point of picking a bowler and have him bowl just 2 overs..he's not criticizing shafiul but rather shakib..if you pick a bowler wouldnt u want 2 bowl him more then just 2 overs? If shakib is reluctant 2 bowl him then bring in shuvo because he seemed 2 like 2 use the spinners..i think he deserves 2 be in the team but should be used more then just 2 overs..

Tiger - you are funny, really funny.

Can I ask you - did you even read my post ? Did you even understand what I wrote ?

I shudder to ask - how well do you even understand written English ?

Players are chosen to perform. This is not Soccer, such that a player will be substituted. If a captain perceives that tactically it is required to bring in spin for damage control, than a cricketing captain has only one option left - take a bowler off for good.

Cricket players are not like pre -ordered materials, that will end up being used for some project, for sure.

And Shakib, fortunately understands that. You do not.

I think you jumped on me here, w/o understanding anything.

NKVD
February 28, 2010, 10:13 PM
Why are blaming Shakib? He has to play the lineup and the so called strategy he got from his coach.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition (iPhone)

Shakib is our captain. I would think that he has a say in things.

Are you pre-meditating another Siddons assault here ?

Ajfar
February 28, 2010, 10:16 PM
Why are blaming Shakib? He has to play the lineup and the so called strategy he got from his coach.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition (iPhone)

why are you blaming the coach, he has to deal with so called players that can't carry out his plan

Tiger444
February 28, 2010, 10:22 PM
Tiger - you are funny, really funny.

Can I ask you - did you even read my post ? Did you even understand what I wrote ?

I shudder to ask - how well do you even understand written English ?

Players are chosen to perform. This is not Soccer, such that a player will be substituted. If a captain perceives that tactically it is required to bring in spin for damage control, than a cricketing captain has only one option left - take a bowler off for good.

Cricket players are not like pre -ordered materials, that will end up being used for some project, for sure.

And Shakib, fortunately understands that. You do not.

I think you jumped on me here, w/o understanding anything.

umm ya i understand english..as a matter of fact I study at a great university called Syracuse University in the USA..so dont question my ability 2 understand english buddy..why are you jumping in2 conclusions? Whose putting Shafiul inder oo im really sorry i mean under the scope? People are just stating the fact that why he was picked 2 just bowl 2 overs..we're putting shakib under the scope for this decision not shafiul..so yes i understood your post..you on the other hand have misunderstood the post..next time try 2 understand what people are saying rather then just accusing people and starting **** 4 no reason..

tejkuni
February 28, 2010, 10:31 PM
When Shafiul was included, it was not known that BD will score only 228 and England will need to bat around 45 overs. If BD's score was 250+ or England was batting first, we would need bowlers for bowling 50 overs. How it was possible without Shafiul.

Jesus87
February 28, 2010, 10:40 PM
umm ya i understand english..as a matter of fact I study at a great university called Syracuse University in the USA..so dont question my ability 2 understand english buddy..why are you jumping in2 conclusions? Whose putting Shafiul inder oo im really sorry i mean under the scope? People are just stating the fact that why he was picked 2 just bowl 2 overs..we're putting shakib under the scope for this decision not shafiul..so yes i understood your post..you on the other hand have misunderstood the post..next time try 2 understand what people are saying rather then just accusing people and starting **** 4 no reason..

This guys is here to fight with people, read in his other post asking for a fight "bring it on" lol his own words. Ignore him bro.

NKVD
February 28, 2010, 10:45 PM
This guys is here to fight with people, read in his other post asking for a fight "bring it on" lol his own words. Ignore him bro.

bring it on w/ resourceful arguments.

There also is a movie called bring it on - that has nothing to fo with fights.

Its called being able to stand up to a challenging discussion.

NKVD
February 28, 2010, 10:46 PM
umm ya i understand english..as a matter of fact I study at a great university called Syracuse University in the USA..so dont question my ability 2 understand english buddy..why are you jumping in2 conclusions? Whose putting Shafiul inder oo im really sorry i mean under the scope? People are just stating the fact that why he was picked 2 just bowl 2 overs..we're putting shakib under the scope for this decision not shafiul..so yes i understood your post..you on the other hand have misunderstood the post..next time try 2 understand what people are saying rather then just accusing people and starting **** 4 no reason..

lets see ur syracuse transcripts Mr. 2 2 2 2 2

:-D

Ajfar
February 28, 2010, 10:47 PM
Its called being able to stand up to a challenging discussion.

discussion don't include calling someone stupid or questioning their ability to understand English. you wanna have a rational discussion, then talk rationally with out calling them out.

fwullah
February 28, 2010, 10:49 PM
In the last few matches that I've seen Shafiul play; it may be an off-topic, but I have noticed that Shafiul can bat better than Abdur Razzak and Shahadat Hossain put together (let alone Rubel).

If Tamim had been at the crease till the end, Shafiul could have accompanied him for 5 to 10 overs, if not more. Abdur Razzak or Shahadat Hossain, on the other hand, do not seem to have that patience to accompany a specialist batsman on the other end. And Rubel can't even bat.

Rommel
February 28, 2010, 10:50 PM
NKVD, bring it on. I can take you any day of the week son.

Ajfar
February 28, 2010, 10:50 PM
NKVD, bring it on. I can take you any day of the week son.

haha ro your record on the Ash hater thread is not very good, be careful what you wish for.

Tiger444
February 28, 2010, 10:53 PM
thanks for the support bangladesh_sy and jesus87..and what bangladesh_sy said..im more then happy to have a rational discussion here NVKD..i dont know why ur calling me out like this..kinda lame 2 fight me on a forum..and you dont believe that i go 2 syracuse? Ask people here and you'll get proof..

auntu
February 28, 2010, 10:54 PM
I have a few whys?

Why did Shafi even play?
Why did we play an unfit Mash over Rubel?
Why is Siddons being so stubborn with Zunaid and making him a no.3 ( In tests, he has done decent, but for ODIs, no.3 is just not him )?

The line-up we produced was a losing one to begin with. No.3 and No.4, two most critical slots for any batting line up are always occupied by our most shaky batsmen on confidence. As a result, the good starts provided by Tamim are losing momentum. I don't think both Aftab and Zunaid are suited to play. One has to go, or both hopefully from the ODI side. Aftab at least has some resume in ODI's and at no.3, but Zunaid has none.

Including Mash and Raj was a mistake.
Agree with you.

Razzak's inclusion was understandable but I was surprised to see Zunaed and Aftab bat at no 4. Riyad should have batted at no. 4 and Aftab could come at 6 or 7.

Playing Mash was a mistake. He needs more time to gain fitness. Even though he bowled quite well.

Zunaid
February 28, 2010, 11:02 PM
NKVD, bring it on. I can take you any day of the week son.

Didn't know you were a cheerleader, missy.

wiseshah
February 28, 2010, 11:05 PM
i wud like to see this team in the 2nd ODI

tamim
Imrul
Mushfiq
sakib
mahmudullah
aftab
naeem
shuvo
razzaq
mashrafe/rubel
shafiul

Gowza
February 28, 2010, 11:09 PM
shakib's opinion should strongly influence the starting XI, the captain needs to have the team that he think he can utulise best during the match. maybe shakib read things wrong and wanted shafi there at first but after a couple of overs decided it was wrong so didn't use him again but if he underbowls players consistently then either he's not a good captain or management aren't taking into account his opinion on the best XI.

AsifTheManRahman
February 28, 2010, 11:31 PM
Didn't know you were a cheerleader, missy.
Good one.

NitaiPal
February 28, 2010, 11:53 PM
ahh i only wish the players of the bd team fought like this against the brits

bujhee kom
March 1, 2010, 12:03 AM
Ami khoob mentally bhenge porechi bhais and apas!

NKVD
March 1, 2010, 12:11 AM
NKVD, bring it on. I can take you any day of the week son.

who are you ? Have our paths crossed ?

You can take me for what....?

Sorry my friend, I am not one of your 1000 sons littered across the landscape of your infedility?

NKVD
March 1, 2010, 12:15 AM
shakib's opinion should strongly influence the starting XI, the captain needs to have the team that he think he can utulise best during the match. maybe shakib read things wrong and wanted shafi there at first but after a couple of overs decided it was wrong so didn't use him again but if he underbowls players consistently then either he's not a good captain or management aren't taking into account his opinion on the best XI.

You may be true, Gowza. Another reason for underbowling someone is because our players are not consistent performers.

Also, as long as he is not underbowling the same player repeatedly. we know it is inconsistancy that is driving him to do so.

We are just a struggling newbie. Not you, but many of us think that the dividends are to be reaped the day after joining BD cricket fan club. If its not there, then go for Hail Mary conversations, accusations and decisions.

bujhee kom
March 1, 2010, 12:16 AM
I think when you fight on BC, it is just misdirected misguided sweat, fume and testosteron....hahahahaa!

reyme
March 1, 2010, 12:43 AM
why are you blaming the coach, he has to deal with so called players that can't carry out his plan

what an irony! This is the very same player who got picked up by this very same coach!
Players cant carrry out plans, players don't listen, plyers throw their wickets. Yet they get picked by this very same coach.
maybe this so called head coach should beg these players by touching their feet to execute HIS
Nobel winning game plan, afterall this the only way out, he can't teach them anyway, too bad he has no choice.
He did not prepare bench players in 2.5 years. I mean someone must take some vacation!
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Gowza
March 1, 2010, 12:51 AM
You may be true, Gowza. Another reason for underbowling someone is because our players are not consistent performers.

Also, as long as he is not underbowling the same player repeatedly. we know it is inconsistancy that is driving him to do so.

We are just a struggling newbie. Not you, but many of us think that the dividends are to be reaped the day after joining BD cricket fan club. If its not there, then go for Hail Mary conversations, accusations and decisions.

yes for sure, if a bowler is having a bad day and you have someone who can do a better job that day then you'll go for a better option. but generally the specialist bowlers should be better than the part timers so if they're being underbowled regularly then obviously something isn't right.

SMHasan
March 1, 2010, 01:17 AM
We got a false sense of reliability that's for sure. I think we are depending too much on our spinners, it can be compared to 'bind love' where everything else is secondary! I understand that if we wanted to win that match then it was our spinners who would do the principal job. But not in this way. We had two front line pacers but they were merely used.

In any day, in any track I would prefer a good Shafiul/Mashrafee than a good Naeem/Mahmud Ullah as a wicket taking bowler. Remember Shafiul takes wickets and he proved it already.

When defending a small total like this you must have to take wickets because you just cannot contain the batsman. If Shafiul could have taken 2/3 wickets then who knows what would happen.

Shakib and team management needs to learn from this.

Tiger Manc
March 1, 2010, 12:49 PM
Yeah but at the same time, if your spinners have good economy rates and your pacers are getting smashed out of the park, then surely you would take your pacers out of the attack. Especially with Bangladesh defending such a low total, Shakib had to put his spinners on straight away.

Tigers_eye
March 1, 2010, 01:06 PM
Shafiul was included for various reason.
1) He is the best we got.
2) Bowl and get wickets.
3) Bowl in the death overs and restrict opponents.
+++
Game plan changed when we were invited to bat.
a) Batsmen didn't do their job so that Shafiul could bowl more overs.
b) Game plan changed more when Over-sized Mash could NOT get it done.
c) Clearly, the pitch and the opponents had no answer on spin bowling. The early drop changed the game. England kept on attacking and the game got out of our hands.
+++
If you exclude Shafiul and England would opt to bat, would you open to with a 3-6 month pregant and "hit me" spinner?

LateCut
March 1, 2010, 01:28 PM
The English batsmen were playing our pacers Mash .......

Hmmm! Was Mash a pacer? He was bowling under 120Km/hr. He was slower than Aftab. I hope he does not play in the 2nd ODI. He should prove his worth in the domestics and A-team before getting integrated. While I am at it, Razzak's was so scared of chucking that he was merely lobbing the ball and geting nowhere with it. I say get Razzak off and bring Shuvo.

mij
March 1, 2010, 02:33 PM
Why Mash is even in the team he couldn't even do his run up, he was out of the game for so long, and he wan't match fit to play yesterday.

SS
March 1, 2010, 02:36 PM
who are you ? Have our paths crossed ?

You can take me for what....?

Sorry my friend, I am not one of your 1000 sons littered across the landscape of your infedility?

I thought we were discussing about Shafiul...how come we are now discussing about infedility...Can we then change the topic to the later on ..it might be interesting topic

Tiger444
March 1, 2010, 02:57 PM
I thought we were discussing about Shafiul...how come we are now discussing about infedility...Can we then change the topic to the later on ..it might be interesting topic

SS bro no point of getting at it with this dood..he tries 2 pick fightz on this site with a lot of people including me..i wanna ask u NKVD..where do u go 2 college? Since your talkin so big about me not understandin english and wanna see my transcript..maybe u cannot go 2 a college like Syracuse and you just wanna get at me because of jealousy..or u just like 2 pick fightz on the internet..here is wat i gotta say 2 u..pickin fightz wit numerous people 4 no reason is just a cowardous act..real men battle out fightz in person not on the internet..

Anywayz back 2 cricket..shafiul really needs 2 bowl more overs..the man has been a real find and it will only help him going against the likes of collingwood and pieterson..

bd fan
March 1, 2010, 05:29 PM
NKVD I'll take u down anyday
I'll take u downtown
n Tiger 444 don't mess wid me
ill take u downtown
n Bangladesh_ sy
i'll take u downtown
n Jesus 87
i'll take u downtown

ayte bois i'll take u all down
anyone touch me and i'll smash their faces

Rommel u live in an arse

no one touch mee!!!

so everyone shut up and do poo now or i'll stuff needles up all of ur buts

bd fan
March 1, 2010, 05:32 PM
Tiger 444 is a nerd
no one give a s*** if u go 2 a good uni
i go 2 Oxford

bd fan
March 1, 2010, 05:33 PM
pitersen= pitta bread

Tigers_eye
March 1, 2010, 05:38 PM
I want bd fan to become a Mod first, then Pri-minister of BD. :)
Not all can rule with an Iron rod.

Tiger444
March 1, 2010, 05:55 PM
Tiger 444 is a nerd
no one give a s*** if u go 2 a good uni
i go 2 Oxford

bro assumptions arent the way 2 go..takin a cheap shot at me doesnt do any good..did i say anythin 2 u 2 respond like that 2 me? I was just defending myself after another cheapshot artist went after me..ya i do study hard in the library but i do party hard on the weekends, look 2 have a good time, and also have a good number of friends..im proud of where i go and was not attempting 2 brag..if u ever looked at my fb account then u would look like a complete idiot 4 making that comment..

Ajfar
March 1, 2010, 11:29 PM
no bd fan i don't wanna go downtown with you, i don't roll that way. ask around i'm sure you'll find someone else out there

NKVD
March 1, 2010, 11:43 PM
[QUOTE=Tiger444;1096644]i wanna ask u NKVD..where do u go 2 college? Since your talkin so big about me not understandin english and wanna see my transcript..maybe u cannot go 2 a college like Syracuse and you just wanna get at me because of jealousy..or u just like 2 pick fightz on the internet..here is wat i gotta say 2 u..pickin fightz wit numerous people 4 no reason is just a cowardous act..real men battle out fightz in person not on the internet..
QUOTE]

Tiger...I was curious about your true grasp over the written language being used here. I could care less about your educational background. If you go to Syracuse, and you are proud of it, so be it. No arguments. I never geard of Syracuse..I know there is a place in NY somewhat close to Ithaca. If going to Syracuse makes one adept at English, so be it.

I was just not aware of it. But now I am.

Not sure if I am picking a fight...all I am picking is your brain. And boy, could there have been something easier.

Also, I have no college degree. I have an associate degree from a non-descript community college, that took me 3 years to get. I also have some glorified certificates.

None of them are from Syracuse.

Lets now put your Syracuse education into some action and figure out why Shafiul even played. Can you do that ?

NKVD
March 1, 2010, 11:46 PM
I thought we were discussing about Shafiul...how come we are now discussing about infedility...Can we then change the topic to the later on ..it might be interesting topic

I was being made into someone's son. As far as I know, my daddy was my real one, andhe ain't anybody from this site. Someone mistook me as his progeny.

Tiger444
March 2, 2010, 12:04 AM
[QUOTE=Tiger444;1096644]i wanna ask u NKVD..where do u go 2 college? Since your talkin so big about me not understandin english and wanna see my transcript..maybe u cannot go 2 a college like Syracuse and you just wanna get at me because of jealousy..or u just like 2 pick fightz on the internet..here is wat i gotta say 2 u..pickin fightz wit numerous people 4 no reason is just a cowardous act..real men battle out fightz in person not on the internet..
QUOTE]

Tiger...I was curious about your true grasp over the written language being used here. I could care less about your educational background. If you go to Syracuse, and you are proud of it, so be it. No arguments. I never geard of Syracuse..I know there is a place in NY somewhat close to Ithaca. If going to Syracuse makes one adept at English, so be it.

I was just not aware of it. But now I am.

Not sure if I am picking a fight...all I am picking is your brain. And boy, could there have been something easier.

Also, I have no college degree. I have an associate degree from a non-descript community college, that took me 3 years to get. I also have some glorified certificates.

None of them are from Syracuse.

Lets now put your Syracuse education into some action and figure out why Shafiul even played. Can you do that ?

Okay man..hope you just dont use that statement again because i did take that 2 heart..its just the way i am..anyways back 2 cricket..shafiul shouldve been utilised more in the last match instead of mash..mash has just been out of cricket for 2 long 2 have bowled that many overs..it was a clear mistake from shakib but i understand he is such a young captain that he is bound 2 make mistakes like this..he probably thought that since its mash, he'll be able 2 perform back 2 himself..i don't know but it clearly didnt work out did it? I hope shakib learns from this mistake soon..i think shakib is gonna be a great captain in the future but as of now he is still learnin on the job..as a fan though i will be critical of him with some of his moves..but of course nobody can be perfect..lets see what shakib does in the next match and hopefully he utilises shafiul more..the guy has done pretty well and its smart 2 have him at the english batsmen..