View Full Version : unholy affair betweeen Razzak and who ever

March 21, 2010, 11:41 PM
The new ball has been taken, and Abdur Razzak - of all people - will have first use of it.

i dont want to name names ..but a failed sla with a new ball..!!???

Please Razzak porve me wrong..
I want to know if I was thinking wrong...

March 21, 2010, 11:52 PM
<TR><TD width="100%">Abdur Razzak to Prior, 1 run, yet another poor delivery, and easily played by Prior. Fortunately there is a cover sweeper positioned, and so this time they are kept to one
</TD></TR><TR><TD width="30" align="right">82.4
</TD><TD width="100%">Abdur Razzak to Prior, FOUR, Razzak leaking runs here. This one is much, much too short and wide too and Prior slaps it hard behind point

March 21, 2010, 11:53 PM
4-1-20-0 this is horrible stuff from razzak

March 21, 2010, 11:54 PM
anyway..... raj had a fluke bowling in the 2nd innings in ctg that prompted to select him this game.

March 21, 2010, 11:55 PM
whats going on in sakib's mind.... -shamim

March 21, 2010, 11:56 PM
<TR><TD style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px" class=alt2><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=5 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2>http://banglacricket.com/alochona/image.php?u=2221&dateline=1268692679 (http://banglacricket.com/alochona/member.php?u=2221)</TD><TD noWrap>bangladesh_sy (http://banglacricket.com/alochona/member.php?u=2221) http://banglacricket.com/alochona/images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/user_online.gif<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_1120481", true); </SCRIPT>
Cricket Guru
</TD><TD width="100%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top noWrap>Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Fazilpur
<!-- Added Fav Player -->Favorite Player: Nirala
<!-- End Fav Player -->Posts: 8,504

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- / user info --></TD></TR><TR><TD id=td_post_1120481 class=alt1><!-- message, attachments, sig --><!-- icon and title -->
<HR style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); COLOR: rgb(255,255,255)" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->what the hell was that from razzak?? shakib come on man. use your head. you know better than that

March 21, 2010, 11:59 PM
i have been saying this from beginning that razzaq will be the weakest link in the team, he was garbage in first test and still they continued him. he is not a test material but he is good for ODI and 20/20.

i am afraid because of his poor performance in test, he will lose his 20 20 position.

anyway, why we r continuing so much in this match, when we have riad and naeem in the stock. sakib should use them and give razzaq a break before match goes beyond our limit

March 22, 2010, 12:00 AM
<TR><TD class=endofover colspan="2"><TABLE style="MARGIN-TOP: 5px" border=0 cellSpacing=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=bbover>ell</TD><TD class=bbover> </TD><TD class=bbover>57* (109b 6x4)</TD><TD class=bbover> </TD><TD class=bbover>Shafiul Islam</TD><TD class=bbover> </TD><TD class=bbover>8-2-18-0</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD colspan="2">
Shakib has got to re-think his tactics here. There is no consistency to Razzaks bowling, and he doesn't look remotely like taking a wicket

March 22, 2010, 12:01 AM
I am at lost

March 22, 2010, 12:02 AM
shakib will bowl sla to left handed batsman...why cant he bowl?

March 22, 2010, 12:03 AM
intillgent cricket comes from strong domesic cricket culture...period