PDA

View Full Version : গভীর রাতে নাটকীয় সিদ্ধান্ত, বরিশাল সেমিতে!


reverse_swing
February 27, 2012, 03:53 PM
[বাংলা]গভীর রাতে নাটকীয় সিদ্ধান্ত, বরিশাল সেমিতে!

ঢাকা: টেলিভিশনের স্ক্রিনে ভেসে উঠেছিলো বরিশাল সেমিফাইনালে। বিপিএল ওয়েব সাইটেও তাই প্রচার করা হয়। বিসিবি স্কোরারদের কাছ থেকেও পাওয়া যায় একই তথ্য। এরপর কোন সংশয় ছিলো না বরিশাল বার্নার্সের। চিটাগং কিংসকে ১৫ ওভারে হারিয়ে সেমিফাইনাল নিশ্চিত জেনে মুহূর্তটি উদযাপন করে বরিশাল।

একদিন পরে সোমবার বিকেলে বিপিএল গভর্নিং কাউন্সিলের কর্মকর্তারা জানান বরিশাল সেমিফাইনালে যাচ্ছে না! বিপিএল গভর্নিং কাউন্সিলের চেয়ারম্যান গাজী আশরাফ হোসেন লিপু তখন পর্যন্ত বাইলজের ধারা মনযোগ দিয়ে পড়ে দেখেননি! ফ্রেঞ্চাইজি দলগুলোও ওই বিষয়ে পরিষ্কার ছিলো না।

সোমবার সন্ধ্যায় প্রেসবক্সে সাংবাদিকদের ব্যাখ্যা দিয়ে লিপু বোঝান হেড-টু-হেডে এগিয়ে থাকায় বরিশাল নয় চিটাগং কিংস সেমিফাইনালে। আপত্তি তোলে বরিশালের কর্মকর্তারা। লিগ পর্বের খেলা শেষ হলে জরুরী বৈঠকে বসেন বিপিএল টেকনিক্যাল কমিটি ও বিপিএল গভর্নিং কাউন্সিলের কর্মকর্তারা। টুর্নামেন্টের বাইলজের ধারা-উপধারাগুলো খতিয়ে দেখার পর শেষে সিদ্ধান্তে আসে চিটাগং নয় বরিশাল সেমিফাইনালে!

গভীর রাতের সিদ্ধান্ত অনুযায়ী মঙ্গলবার বিপিএলের সেমিফাইনাল খেলছে দুরন্ত রাজশাহী, খুলনা রয়েল বেঙ্গলস, ঢাকা গ্ল্যাডিয়েটরস ও বরিশাল বার্নার্স।

হেট-টু-হেড এবং রনগড়ের জটিল সমীকরণের ধোয়াশা এবং বিপিএল গভর্নিং কাউন্সিলের চেয়ারম্যান লিপুর ভুলের মাশুল গুণতে হয় সংবাদ মাধ্যমকে। বিপিএল গভর্নিং কাউন্সিলের ভুলে পুরো জাতির কাছে পৌঁছে যায় বিভ্রান্তিকর তথ্য।

অতএব মঙ্গলবার প্রথম সেমিফাইনাল হবে দুপুর ২টায় রাজশাহীর বিপক্ষে বরিশাল বার্নার্সের। দ্বিতীয় সেমিফাইনাল হবে সন্ধ্যা সাড়ে ছয়টায় খুলনা ও ঢাকার মধ্যে।

বাংলাদেশ সময়: ২০১১ ঘণ্টা, ফেব্রুয়ারি ২৭, ২০১২

Source>> (http://www.banglanews24.com/Cricket/detailsnews.php?nssl=4162428485550fc0105768f533c0e ca5&nttl=2702201291917)[/বাংলা]

shakibrulz
February 27, 2012, 04:06 PM
Governing Council & Technical Committee rule Barisal Burners are 4th qualifier for semis

The BPL Governing Council and the event Technical Committee for BPL T20 have ruled that Barisal Burners are the 4th qualifiers for today's semifinals. The decision was taken after an issue had been raised in regards to the positions of the three teams (Dhaka Gladiators, Barisal Burners & Chittagong Kings) finishing on equal points behind Duronto Rajshahi and Khulna Royal Bengals. The top four teams qualify for the semifinals with number one playing the fourth positioned side and number two taking on the third placed team.

In a joint meeting the BPL Governing Council and Technical Committee examined the playing conditions and its interpretations and made the following ruling:

1. Duronto Rajshahi (14 points) and Khulna Royal Bengals (12 points) finished top two on points and qualify for the semis as the 1st and 2nd placed teams respectively.

2. Three teams - Dhaka Gladiators, Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings are on equal (10) points. Dhaka Gladiators have most wins from meetings with Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings and therefore qualify as the 3rd semifinalist.

3. With Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings both having one win against each other the 4th qualifier had to be decided on the basis of superior net run rate. Barisal edged ahead of Chittagong on net run rate to become the 4th semifinalist.

The BPL Governing Council and Technical Committee sincerely regret any misunderstanding that may have risen regarding this issue.

Semifinal Lineup

1st Semifinal: Duronto Rajshahi (1) v Barisal Burners (4)

Match starts at 2pm

1st Semifinal: Khulna Royal Bengals (2) v Dhaka Gladiators (3)

Match starts at 6:30pm

Courtesy: SAJ from PakPassion, reliable enough so.

kalpurush
February 27, 2012, 04:17 PM
Ha! Ha!! Thanks for the laugh BCB!!!

ialbd
February 27, 2012, 04:38 PM
eita ekdom 100% deshi natok.... india/pakistan keu parbena emon jinish dite.... BPL ki emni emni no 1 naki.....

p.s: have to wait till the toss tomorrow to see who's actually playing. dekha jabe Duronto Rajshahi re baad diye Chittagong Barisal semi-final kheltese....

simon
February 27, 2012, 04:43 PM
eita ekdom 100% deshi natok.... india/pakistan keu parbena emon jinish dite.... BPL ki emni emni no 1 naki.....

p.s: have to wait till the toss tomorrow to see who's actually playing. dekha jabe Duronto Rajshahi re baad diye Chittagong Barisal semi-final kheltese....

etao ekta boro achievement :-p

MohammedC
February 27, 2012, 04:46 PM
etao ekta boro achievement :-p

The greatest entertainment currently held in Dhaka.

Shere Bangla National Comedy Studio-m

idrinkh2O
February 27, 2012, 04:47 PM
বিপিএল :facepalm: গভর্নিং :facepalm: কাউন্সিলের :facepalm: চেয়ারম্যান :facepalm: গাজী :facepalm: আশরাফ :facepalm: হোসেন :facepalm: লিপু :facepalm:

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

Gazi Ashraf Hossain Lipu beta ekta incompetent chagol. :-P :-P :-P

Nadim
February 27, 2012, 04:50 PM
বিপিএল গভর্নিং কাউন্সিলের চেয়ারম্যান :facepalm: গাজী :facepalm: আশরাফ :facepalm: হোসেন :facepalm: লিপু :facepalm:

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

Gazi Ashraf Hossain Lipu beta ekta incompetent chagol. :-P :-P :-P

chagol ke eto choto koren keno??
kubanir somoy chagol onek kaje lage, lipu to tao na :floor:

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 04:51 PM
Niomito, natok .
Documented Drama.
http://www.banglacricket.com/alochona/showpost.php?p=1479774&postcount=1741
http://bplt20.com.bd/media/news/1330365175_By-laws-2.jpg

reverse_swing
February 27, 2012, 04:56 PM
Cricinfo (http://www.espncricinfo.com/bangladesh-premier-league-2012/engine/current/match/551075.html) >> Barisal Burners vs Duronto Rajshahi
BPLT20 >> (http://bplt20.com.bd/) duronto rajshahi vs chittagong kings 1st Semi Final Feb 28, 2012 14:30:00 pm (2:30 PM BDT | 8:30 AM GMT)

reverse_swing
February 27, 2012, 04:58 PM
Barisal named as 4th semi-finalist



In quite the U-turn, the BPL Governing Council and the event Technical Committee for BPL T20 have ruled early today morning that Barisal Burners are to be the 4th qualifiers for today's semifinals.
The decision was taken after an issue had been raised in regards to the positions of the three teams (Dhaka Gladiators, Barisal Burners & Chittagong Kings) finishing on equal points behind Duronto Rajshahi and Khulna Royal Bengals. The top four teams qualify for the semifinals with number one playing the fourth positioned side and number two taking on the third placed team.
After an earlier meeting on Monday evening, it was announced that Chittagong Kings would go through on the basis of a superior head-to-head record compared to Barisal’s among the three teams tied on ten points.
But later the same day a joint meeting by the BPL Governing Council and Technical Committee examined the playing conditions and its interpretations and made the following ruling:
1. Duronto Rajshahi (14 points) and Khulna Royal Bengals (12 points) finished top two on points and qualify for the semis as the 1st and 2nd placed teams respectively.
2. Three teams - Dhaka Gladiators, Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings are on equal (10) points. Dhaka Gladiators have most wins from meetings with Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings and therefore qualify as the 3rd semifinalist.
3. With Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings both having one win against each other the 4th qualifier had to be decided on the basis of superior net run rate. Barisal edged ahead of Chittagong on net run rate to become the 4th semifinalist.
The BPL Governing Council and Technical Committee sincerely regret any misunderstanding that may have risen regarding this issue.
Semifinal Lineup
1st Semifinal: Duronto Rajshahi (1) v Barisal Burners (4)
Match starts at 2pm
1st Semifinal: Khulna Royal Bengals (2) v Dhaka Gladiators (3)
Match starts at 6:30pm


http://bplt20.com.bd/news/barisal-named-as-4th-semifinalist-bpl.html

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 04:59 PM
Cricinfo (http://www.espncricinfo.com/bangladesh-premier-league-2012/engine/currenat/match/551075.html) >> Barisal Burners vs Duronto Rajshahi
BPLT20 >> (http://bplt20.com.bd/) duronto rajshahi vs chittagong kings 1st Semi Final Feb 28, 2012 14:30:00 pm (2:30 PM BDT | 8:30 AM GMT)
http://i1235.photobucket.com/albums/ff430/zsayeed/drama.jpg

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 05:00 PM
Ai hai, aitato shanghatik.

reverse_swing
February 27, 2012, 05:01 PM
http://i1235.photobucket.com/albums/ff430/zsayeed/drama.jpg

It works for me. :)

22Yards
February 27, 2012, 05:01 PM
This H2H is pretty darn confusing.

What if Dhaka had the same number of wins as the other two ? What would be the deciding factor there. NRR ? So the highest NRR goes thru and we are down to H2H between the remaining two. if their no of wins also matches we do a NRR again. So technically the H2H is only interfereing when there are two teams so therefore its not the following deciding factor after points if three or more teams have the same no of points.(H2H between three, as previous, is ridiculus. What were they thinking?)

And now since Dhaka is thru with most no of wins out of three, we are doing a H2h between kings and burners.

So basically no one knows which would be the deciding factor, the NRR or H2H if you have the same points. To know that you also have to take into account the no of teams who have the same points and additionally the no of wins you have with each other.

Intresting if we knew about this before but it looks pretty stupid right now.

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 05:01 PM
3. With Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings both having one win against each other the 4th qualifier had to be decided on the basis of superior net run rate. Barisal edged ahead of Chittagong on net run rate to become the 4th semifinalist.

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 05:02 PM
CAS Switzerland lagbey

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 05:03 PM
It works for me. :)

Things are changing so fast the www is failing.:) In the link should be current, not currenat.

22Yards
February 27, 2012, 05:06 PM
Niomito, natok .
Documented Drama.
http://www.banglacricket.com/alochona/showpost.php?p=1479774&postcount=1741
http://bplt20.com.bd/media/news/1330365175_By-laws-2.jpg

Just saw this, interesting the clause only talks about three teams having the same points, what if they also have the same no of wins ? cant that happen ?

edit: read again carfully, it says it right there. Okay I am satisfied understanding the creterion or "documented natok".

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 05:25 PM
Law's Lineup limited in longevity by lurking lines in League Law
thought I would add this alliteration:)

i_1_primeval_man
February 27, 2012, 05:57 PM
Barisal named as 4th semi-finalist


But later the same day a joint meeting by the BPL Governing Council and Technical Committee examined the playing conditions and its interpretations and made the following ruling:
1. Duronto Rajshahi (14 points) and Khulna Royal Bengals (12 points) finished top two on points and qualify for the semis as the 1st and 2nd placed teams respectively.
2. Three teams - Dhaka Gladiators, Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings are on equal (10) points. Dhaka Gladiators have most wins from meetings with Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings and therefore qualify as the 3rd semifinalist.
3. With Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings both having one win against each other the 4th qualifier had to be decided on the basis of superior net run rate. Barisal edged ahead of Chittagong on net run rate to become the 4th semifinalist.

http://bplt20.com.bd/news/barisal-named-as-4th-semifinalist-bpl.html

"Dhaka Gladiators have most wins from meetings with Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings and therefore qualify as the 3rd semifinalist"

Hang on, so here they are taking into account DG's result against both CK and BB. DG have 3 win out of 4.

"With Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings both having one win against each other the 4th qualifier had to be decided on the basis of superior net run rate. "

CK have 2 win out of 4 against DG and BB. BB have only 1 win out of 4 against DG & CK.Now how come they are considering BB and CK's result only against each other and not against DG.

The dcocument of rules clearly states that the number of wins in between multiple teams tied on the same point would come ahead of NRR. The number of win being considered here is not against each other, it's against the rest of the two or more teams tied on the same point. If it was only against each other as they are pointing out for CK & BB, then DG wouldn't qualify ahead of CK as they are 1-1 against each other.

After reading the rules, now i feel that CK have been robbed.

Lipu and the BPL Governing Council are pure jokes. Also how come they were allowing teams to fly in players at this stage of the tournament? CK were supposed to fly in Wahab Riaz and Umar Akmal. I know they provided an window to sign in 4 additional players in the middle of the tournament, but that window was closed on the 22nd of Feb. As it stands,any team can essentially bring in any player at any time. Then what's the point of an auction?

Ahsan
February 27, 2012, 06:42 PM
Oh my my!! Gah Lipu would beat circus jokers hands down.

Zunaid
February 27, 2012, 06:45 PM
Law's Lineup limited in longevity by lurking lines in League Law
thought I would add this alliteration:)

Brilliant!

Cricket canon conundrum confuses correspondents.

Raynman
February 27, 2012, 07:00 PM
not sure what BPL committee can do at this point. Any decision will be a mess unless they choose to make CTG and BRSL playoff against each other with a mutual decision and alter the schedule (or force them to play an early game).

Per the written law it really should be CTG, but a big mess has been made by not notifying/clarifying with officials and broadcasters.

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 07:00 PM
Brilliant!

Cricket canon conundrum confuses correspondents.

Heh heh touche! And C for Chittagone , I mean, Chittagong as well.

i_1_primeval_man
February 27, 2012, 07:10 PM
CK franchise owners should sue BPL. This is not a Mamarbarir Shaatchara league. There's are some hard and fast rules written in black and white.

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 07:29 PM
CK franchise owners should sue BPL. This is not a Mamarbarir Shaatchara league. There's are some hard and fast rules written in black and white.

Black and white er majhe abar kuasha bhab. Kothin law, reading it two ways will read two outcomes. What BPL did first was tie break in a 3 way, now they broke tie 3 way, then extracted the winner, and then tie broke two way with remainder. (Zunaid Bhai, this is like your division by zero!).

So, that is why I said need Arbitrator of Sports from Switzerland.

law: http://i1235.photobucket.com/albums/ff430/zsayeed/thik.jpg

1st interpretation:
According to the by-laws, among the tied teams Barisal, Chittagong and Dhaka, Barisal were in the worst position as regards head-to-head calculations, and so have been eliminated from the semi-finals.
2nd interpretation:
2.Three teams - Dhaka Gladiators, Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings are on equal (10) points. Dhaka Gladiators have most wins from meetings with Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings and therefore qualify as the 3rd semifinalist.
3. With Barisal Burners and Chittagong Kings both having one win against each other the 4th qualifier had to be decided on the basis of superior net run rate. Barisal edged ahead of Chittagong on net run rate to become the 4th semifinalist.

If one were to use Occam's razor:
Occam's razor, also known as Ockham's razor, and sometimes expressed in Latin as lex parsimoniae (the law of parsimony, economy or succinctness), is a principle that generally recommends that, from among competing hypotheses, selecting the one that makes the fewest new assumptions usually provides the correct one, and that the simplest explanation will be the most plausible until evidence is presented to prove it false.

Then 1st interpretation will be the truth.

High courtey pathaitey hobey. And like the great Bush-Gore tie break, it may harm the cricket. So, I wouldn't dig any more.
It already has harmed the cricket, and for the sake of cricket - let it rest. Solomon type argument dorkar - you know when he said cut the child in half.

Zeeshan
February 27, 2012, 08:12 PM
lmao@ using ockham's razor... next you is gonna be bringing church turing thesis in it

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 08:18 PM
^ You must be an Information Theorist. Occam is a useful principle.

Zunaid
February 27, 2012, 08:19 PM
ZSayeed - it's your assumption that the 1st interpretation follows logically form parsing the paragraph.

A proper parsing leaves no ambiguity. The ranking amongst the tied teams is predicated by the "winner of the most number of matches amongst themselves". Here the anaphora "themselves" clearly refer to the most immediate applicable noun phrase "these equal teams" which in term is defined a priori as "3 or more teams with equal points".

QED.

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 08:34 PM
You made me look up anaphora. :up:
Yes, I see. Tie broken - take DG out of tie.
C and B still equal in HH, then resort to NRR. But they are not equal in HH as per table, unless table is wrong at http://digicricket.marssil.com/match/MatchData.aspx?op=5&match=192.

Then why the 1st announcement with BB out? the first glimpse makes the case that tie break amogst all three, in which case the HH of 321 still holds,
http://i1235.photobucket.com/albums/ff430/zsayeed/temmm.jpg

If you break the 3 way at the same time, BB is out. If you break the tie in steps, then CK out.
The law states that after placing the team that is highest, after that if there are teams still equal, (note the bold part), then use NRR. BB and CK are NOT equal in HH, CK > BB as per table attached. Then BB is out, because you cannot continue to the next statement, they are not equal in HH.

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 08:39 PM
But then I digress, I said I would let the matter lie.

dash
February 27, 2012, 08:50 PM
ecb has this bylaw in their competition, get a clarification from them

Zunaid
February 27, 2012, 08:51 PM
But then I digress, I said I would let the matter lie.

We are just a couple of old men at a bar arguing over who gets to eat the last peanut. Anway - we can go all pedantic but the horse has left the barn. :)

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 08:53 PM
We are just a couple of old men at a bar arguing over who gets to eat the last peanut. Anway - we can go all pedantic but the horse has left the barn. :)

Yeah, you are right. It was not a matter of justice, but just academic!:)

I hope the horse stays out though.

idrinkh2O
February 27, 2012, 09:49 PM
Fill in the blank:

গভীর রাতে ________________________ |


----------------------

**গভীর রাতে khub ekta valo jinish kom-i hoi.

Rifat H
February 27, 2012, 10:07 PM
Lipu should resign as early as possible . Gonopitani khaoar chance ache unar :yawn::yawn:

i_1_primeval_man
February 27, 2012, 10:20 PM
You made me look up anaphora. :up:
Yes, I see. Tie broken - take DG out of tie.
C and B still equal in HH, then resort to NRR. But they are not equal in HH as per table, unless table is wrong at http://digicricket.marssil.com/match/MatchData.aspx?op=5&match=192.

Then why the 1st announcement with BB out? the first glimpse makes the case that tie break amogst all three, in which case the HH of 321 still holds,
http://i1235.photobucket.com/albums/ff430/zsayeed/temmm.jpg

If you break the 3 way at the same time, BB is out. If you break the tie in steps, then CK out.
The law states that after placing the team that is highest, after that if there are teams still equal, (note the bold part), then use NRR. BB and CK are NOT equal in HH, CK > BB as per table attached. Then BB is out, because you cannot continue to the next statement, they are not equal in HH.

Good analysis ZSayeed.
The law states:
"When three (3) or more teams finish with equal points and equal wins in the league, then the team(s) which was (were) the winner of the most number of matches played between those equal teams in the league will be placed in higher position(s). If after applying this criterion there are any teams which are still equal, then such equal teams shall be ranked according to their net run rate in the league."

Note the bolded parts. As far as i am concerned, it definitely talks about a multiway tie break using the criterion H2H between all the parties involved. If that criterion solves the problem and ranks the teams accordingly, then no need to go to the second criterion which is the NRR. From the stated law, I don't know how one can take one party out using the 1st criterion and apply the 2nd criterion on the rest of the parties when the 1st criterion clearly solves the problem. The law says the winner of the most number of matches played between those equal teams in the league will be placed in higher positions. Note, the use of the word positions, instead of position.

Naimul_Hd
February 27, 2012, 10:21 PM
Things can change just few minutes before the game too. So, dont lose your hopes (to both CTG/ BB supporters).

Rifat H
February 27, 2012, 10:22 PM
According to Wahab Riaz's Twitter status , He and Umar Akmal is coming to dhaka to play for CTG kings. They have to return without playing . BCB ki na pare !!!!

Naimul_Hd
February 27, 2012, 10:24 PM
No wonder why i hated 'Law Subjects' during my undergrad and post grad ! Always makes people confused with 'Word game' and 'loopholes' !

Rifat H
February 27, 2012, 10:28 PM
Jai hok Barisal semifinal khelbe atei ami mohakhushi. Amar pura family tension a chilo . Lipu re paile koekta chopetaghat kortam !!

Naimul_Hd
February 27, 2012, 10:29 PM
Jai hok Barisal semifinal khelbe atei ami mohakhushi. Amar pura family tension a chilo . Lipu re paile koekt chopetaghat kortam !!

Amar jutar size 8/9 ! parle 2 jora juta niye jayen ! amar pokkho theke upohar !

Antora
February 27, 2012, 10:35 PM
Hahahahaha! Oh dear :p

Rifat H
February 27, 2012, 10:39 PM
CTG kings ar Press conference at 11 am . Onoshon kormoshuchi ashbe mone hoy . Lipu ke main guest banaia 7 din onahare rakha hok !!

Naimul_Hd
February 27, 2012, 10:45 PM
Nah...Lipu lokta asholei ekta boka ! Jokhon bhul hoye gese, tokhon chup kore thako...last minute e drama kore ekhon nijer golaye fash !

Night_wolf
February 27, 2012, 10:48 PM
koto natok dakhabe bcb..fools

i_1_primeval_man
February 27, 2012, 10:58 PM
I have nothing against BB and I wish all the best to them and their supporters, but the way the by-laws are written, CK should've gone through. Ck should do a press conference and threaten to pull out and ask for refund of all the investment including the money for the time they spent and the stress they had gone through. A lawsuit should be the way forward. They shouldn't let Lipu & Co. get away with it.

PaperTiger
February 27, 2012, 11:07 PM
Niomito, natok .
Documented Drama.
http://www.banglacricket.com/alochona/showpost.php?p=1479774&postcount=1741
http://bplt20.com.bd/media/news/1330365175_By-laws-2.jpg

my slow brain finally cracked it, Sylhet should play:-D

Naimul_Hd
February 27, 2012, 11:19 PM
No more drama please BCB.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/425486_323707347682079_322250384494442_958503_1500 962344_n.jpg

zsayeed
February 27, 2012, 11:23 PM
:goal::goal::goal::floor::floor:my slow brain finally cracked it, Sylhet should play:-D

Zeeshan
February 27, 2012, 11:36 PM
first part of the thread title is so salivating and scandelicious..."govir raate natokiyo" oooh la la

Rabz
February 27, 2012, 11:44 PM
So, are we sure that BB is playing ??
Not any Bhor dupur er oti natokiyota ???

Zunaid
February 27, 2012, 11:48 PM
So, are we sure that BB is playing ??
Not any Bhor dupur er oti natokiyota ???

We'll have to wait for the coin toss. Who knows, the Dhaka Warriors may turn up.

Rifat H
February 27, 2012, 11:56 PM
So, are we sure that BB is playing ??
Not any Bhor dupur er oti natokiyota ???

Ar kono natok korle sob Barisal basi ak hoia Mirpur mathe circle cricket khela shuru kormu . Kiser BPL ar kiser loitta , Lipu. Sobgulare fielding koramu kintu batting dimu na :E

Jadukor
February 28, 2012, 12:06 AM
Fill in the blank:

গভীর রাতে ________________________ |


----------------------

**গভীর রাতে khub ekta valo jinish kom-i hoi.

not true...

i_1_primeval_man
February 28, 2012, 12:09 AM
^^ Jodi bhordupurer oti natokiyota monchotho na hoi, tahole shara chatgabashi mathe giye jobborer boli khela khelbe..

F6_Turbo
February 28, 2012, 12:09 AM
not true...

http://forum.football365.com/images/smilies/icon_nod.gif

WorldCup11
February 28, 2012, 12:22 AM
These BCB guys are so hard working and dedicated .... :notworthy::notworthy:

They were working until "Gobhir Raat", I am sure they have claimed overtime payment for that, including travel & fooding. Daylight is their family time ..

Rabz
February 28, 2012, 12:24 AM
From this day forward, for any confusion, misconception and/or utter stupidity, it will be referred as, "Dont do a BPL on me, man". "You are such a Lipu at times, I dont know what to believe"


Ar kono natok korle sob Barisal basi ak hoia Mirpur mathe circle cricket khela shuru kormu . Kiser BPL ar kiser loitta , Lipu. Sobgulare fielding koramu kintu batting dimu na :E

We'll have to wait for the coin toss. Who knows, the Dhaka Warriors may turn up.

Sovik
February 28, 2012, 12:47 AM
Did anyone open a match thread for the 1st semi final yet?

Just when you thought BCB couldn't be more incompetent

ialbd
February 28, 2012, 01:03 AM
shob kothar shesh kotha: duita bhul korar dorkar chhilona, one mistake was embarrassing enough... then again we maxed out our quota of jatio lojja long time back....

Jadukor
February 28, 2012, 01:04 AM
Koti takar tournament othocho rules gula valo moton porar shomoi nai

Zeeshan
February 28, 2012, 01:08 AM
Koti takar tournament othocho rules gula valo moton porar shomoi nai

Dishwasher kenar por manual poren bhai? Notun gari kenar por ki manual poren?

Edit: amar to money hoy shob shajano patano..bpl tpl ipl mypl...etc eigual shob fek bhaijan..shob bhua...shob wwe massive wwf patano ghotona..aar amra nichok shonyyo boarder modhe....pura lifetai kintoo patano ghotona anger management er moton...

Zunaid
February 28, 2012, 01:11 AM
Dishwasher kenar por manual poren bhai? Notun gari kenar por ki manual poren?

Yes, you do. You always need to otherwise you can't figure out how to open the gas tank cover or turn on intermittent wiper or adjust the height of your seat.

idrinkh2O
February 28, 2012, 01:13 AM
not true...

Please elaborate jadukor vhai

Jadukor
February 28, 2012, 01:14 AM
@zee: Amar koti takar dish washer er khobor apni jaanlen kivabe bhai?

Hawk-Eye
February 28, 2012, 01:15 AM
[বাংলা]আদালতে যাবে চট্টগ্রাম কিংস[/বাংলা]

[বাংলা]ঢাকা, ফেব্রুয়ারি ২৮ (বিডিনিউজ টোয়েন্টিফোর ডটকম)- সেমিফাইনাল শুরুর দুই ঘণ্টা আগে বিপিএলের শেষ চারের লড়াইয়ে বাদপড়া দল চট্টগ্রাম কিংস জানিয়েছে, যারা কর্তৃপক্ষের সিদ্ধান্তের বিরুদ্ধে আইনি লড়াই চালাবে।

মঙ্গলবার বেলা সাড়ে ১১টায় রূপসী বাংলা হোটেলে সংবাদ সম্মেলনে দলটির পৃষ্ঠপোষক প্রতিষ্ঠান এস কিউ গ্রুপের অন্যতম কর্ণধার সামির কাদের চৌধুরী এই সিদ্ধান্তের কথা জানিয়েছেন।

চট্টগ্রাম দলের অন্যতম কর্ণধার বিএনপির সাবেক সংসদ সদস্য গিয়াসউদ্দিন কাদের চৌধুরী।

সংবাদ সম্মেলনে চট্টগ্রাম কিংসের কোচ খালেদ মাহমুদ সুজন এবং ব্যবস্থাপক নাসির আহমেদ নাসুও ছিলেন।

চট্টগ্রামকে বাদ দিয়ে বরিশাল বার্নার্সকে সেমিফাইনালিস্ট ঘোষণা করে বিপিএল পরিচালনা পর্ষদের সিদ্ধান্তের বিরুদ্ধেই এই সংবাদ সম্মেলন করা হয়।

চট্টগ্রামের সংবাদ সম্মেলনের সময় বরিশাল বাদে অন্য তিন সেমিফাইনালিস্ট দলের কর্মকর্তাদেরও সেখানে দেখা গেছে। ছিলেন দুরন্ত রাজশাহীর ব্যবস্থাপক ফারুক আহমেদ, খুলনা রয়েল বেঙ্গলসের মিডিয়া ম্যানেজার জাহিদ রাজ্জাক মাসুম।
[/বাংলা]
Source (http://www.bdnews24.com/bangla/details.php?cid=2&id=187194&hb=top)

Jadukor
February 28, 2012, 01:17 AM
Please elaborate jadukor vhai

It was a joke... Perhaps better not to elaborate.

idrinkh2O
February 28, 2012, 01:18 AM
আদালতে যাবে চট্টগ্রাম কিংস

o mor Khoda...eto dekhi more drama

Zeeshan
February 28, 2012, 01:18 AM
[বাংলা]আদালতে যাবে চট্টগ্রাম কিংস[/বাংলা]


hahahahahaahahahahahahah :floor: :notworthy::clap::up:

idrinkh2O
February 28, 2012, 01:19 AM
It was a joke... Perhaps better not to elaborate.

haha...I knew it :-p

Zunaid
February 28, 2012, 01:20 AM
The other shoe drops. Why am I not surprised?

Rabz
February 28, 2012, 01:32 AM
আদালতে যাবে চট্টগ্রাম কিংস

o mor Khoda...eto dekhi more drama

Adalote SaKa'r shathe dekha korte jabe ?? :facepalm:

Sorry, couldnt help myself :D

Tigers_eye
February 28, 2012, 01:41 AM
If were Chittagong I would sue. No question asked. Take the bylaws to the court. Sue the amount the tourney winners cash's in plus two MoM amounts.

riajul
February 28, 2012, 01:41 AM
After the BPL authorities said Barisal Burners, not Chittagong Kings, are playing semifinals, <b>Kings said they will move court,</b> just two hours before the first semifinal is set to start.
<br/><br/> Samir Quader Chowdhury, CEO of SQ Sports, which owns the Kings, told a media conference about the decision of the team.
<br/><br/> Coach Khaled Mahmud and manager Nasir Ahmed were also present. <br/><br/>Source >> (http://cricket.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=26&id=219172&%3Fus=ams0f0n7u5r29e21lfelvgnic4)

idrinkh2O
February 28, 2012, 01:55 AM
If were Chittagong I would sue. No question asked. Take the bylaws to the court. Sue the amount the tourney winners cash's in plus two MoM amounts.

but.. but.. but T_E da what about the teaching of Ghandi?
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong.

:D :-p

WorldCup11
February 28, 2012, 02:03 AM
[বাংলা]আদালতে যাবে চট্টগ্রাম কিংস
আদালত এ গিয়ে কি লাভ? আদালত লইট্টা বাহিনী কে শাস্তি দিবে? কিন্তু মাননীয় ক্ষমাশীল রাষ্টপতি কি তাদের ক্ষমা করে দিবেন না?

[/বাংলা]

Anher
February 28, 2012, 02:04 AM
CK has been robbed. BCB going to lose in court as by their tournament laws CK goes to semis.
LOL BCB.

They can create more drama by disqualifying both CK and BB and let Play Sylhet Royals in semifinal. That would be climax of this movie :). Come on BCB, you can do it.

Naimul_Hd
February 28, 2012, 02:08 AM
Good. Now Pakistan Dhaka Gladiator and Dhurdhorsho Rajshahi threatening to boycott if CTG is left out of semis. way to go folks !

I am done with BPL. Talking about BPL team owners bringing fame and glory for our country, this threat from 3 franchise owners serves the promise perfectly. May all rest in peace.

Zunaid
February 28, 2012, 02:12 AM
Started with promise and now with all the drama it has come crashing down. I am now least bothered about the BPL. What a way to leave a bad taste in the mouth. (Zee don't)

Naimul_Hd
February 28, 2012, 02:14 AM
CK has been robbed. BCB going to lose in court as by their tournament laws CK goes to semis.
LOL BCB.

They can create more drama by disqualifying both CK and BB and let Play Sylhet Royals in semifinal. That would be climax of this movie :). Come on BCB, you can do it.

CK was never robbed. If they were so desperate to go to semis then they should have restricted BB from winning the match within 15 overs. CTG had accepted their lose and was happy to congratulate BB. Now, they have got an excuse to make things blurry and they are exploiting it perfectly.

Anher
February 28, 2012, 02:21 AM
^I understand BB deserve to go to semi but if i interpret it correctly BCB tournament laws say its CK should go to semis. i don't see how BCB can win the battle in court.

frd
February 28, 2012, 02:23 AM
http://cricket.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=26&id=219172&%3Fus=dfj8rapsar2ql6vg1er0ukdlo7
hours before the first semifinal is set to start on Tuesday, Chittagong Kings said they will move court over the BPL authorities' decision to allow Barisal Burnerst to play Duronto Rajshahi in the second semifinals.

Samir Quader Chowdhury, CEO of SQ Sports, which owns the Kings, told a media conference about the decision of the team. Coach Khaled Mahmud and manager Nasir Ahmed were present there.

Shafiqul Haque Heera and Faruque Ahmed, the managers of semifinalists Dhaka Gladiators and Duronto Rajshahi, respectively, and Khulna Royal Bengals media manager Jahid Razzaq Masum were also present in the conference.

Dhaka's Heera said his team will support the Kings if they were thrown out illegally.

Faruque of Rajshahi said they will also back the Kings if they were dropped unlawfully. He, however, added they are not abandoning the first semifinal against the Burners at 2pm

what a COMEDY !! :notworthy:
BY THE LAWS OF THE TOURNAMENT CK MUST GET THE SPOT .HAD ANYBODY READ THE LAWS CAREFULLY SUCH INCIDENT WOULDNT HAVE OCCURED .WHAT A SHAME BCB :facepalm:

Anher
February 28, 2012, 02:32 AM
anyway, BB just won the toss and bowling in first semifinal aginast DR.

Rabz
February 28, 2012, 04:00 AM
Well, I do understand BCB made a blunder !!
But how come none of the team owners, the franchise managers, the ex cricketers who are "Directors" and "Advisers" of those franchise read those rules book ??

If BCB is a guilty party in this comical farce, the franchise owners and those ex cricketers who were supposed to be an expert in this area are also equally to be blamed for.

PoorFan
February 28, 2012, 04:07 AM
Since CK once accepted their out when BB won that game, they wont get much going to court.

Rabz
February 28, 2012, 04:14 AM
Nothing will happen at the end of the day.
They are just making some noise when the issue is hot and will fizzle out within few days.

Trust me, IF either Dhaka,Rajshahi or Khulna becomes champion, they will care less who was the fourth team.

End of the day, just one big drama and nothing else.

playmaker
February 28, 2012, 05:44 AM
Since CK once accepted their out when BB won that game, they wont get much going to court.

then y did dhaka not accept their defeat to CTG and let CTG go through

THIS IS PATHETIC

By laws, Chittagong are to go through

Dhakablues
February 28, 2012, 06:13 AM
At the end, it was a fruitful decision for the spectators... We saw a better batting and exciting match than a boring one sided Rajshahi beating Chittagong. Amazing semi final played by Barisal, they made BPL a really exciting tourney!!

BANFAN
February 28, 2012, 06:33 AM
http://cricket.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=26&id=219172&%3Fus=dfj8rapsar2ql6vg1er0ukdlo7
hours before the first semifinal is set to start on Tuesday, Chittagong Kings said they will move court over the BPL authorities' decision to allow Barisal Burnerst to play Duronto Rajshahi in the second semifinals.

Samir Quader Chowdhury, CEO of SQ Sports, which owns the Kings, told a media conference about the decision of the team. Coach Khaled Mahmud and manager Nasir Ahmed were present there.

Shafiqul Haque Heera and Faruque Ahmed, the managers of semifinalists Dhaka Gladiators and Duronto Rajshahi, respectively, and Khulna Royal Bengals media manager Jahid Razzaq Masum were also present in the conference.

Dhaka's Heera said his team will support the Kings if they were thrown out illegally.

Faruque of Rajshahi said they will also back the Kings if they were dropped unlawfully. He, however, added they are not abandoning the first semifinal against the Burners at 2pm

what a COMEDY !! :notworthy:
BY THE LAWS OF THE TOURNAMENT CK MUST GET THE SPOT .HAD ANYBODY READ THE LAWS CAREFULLY SUCH INCIDENT WOULDNT HAVE OCCURED .WHAT A SHAME BCB :facepalm:

Whatever, this incident is making BPL more popular in the country ... Good for the league :) but I see the law in favor of BB...:

hbk619
February 28, 2012, 06:48 AM
then y did dhaka not accept their defeat to CTG and let CTG go through

THIS IS PATHETIC

By laws, Chittagong are to go through

but they are saying the law that was shown was a fake one?source:shamokal.com

Roni_uk
February 28, 2012, 12:30 PM
^^ LOL

so the drama continues. BPL will be kept alive even after the final.

Fake Law
Nasir Jamshed any others?

F6_Turbo
February 28, 2012, 12:34 PM
At the end, it was a fruitful decision for the spectators... We saw a better batting and exciting match than a boring one sided Rajshahi beating Chittagong. Amazing semi final played by Barisal, they made BPL a really exciting tourney!!

Yup, I gotta be honest...the 20 odd thousand at the stadium today, didn't give a damn about the whole controversy with Chittagong and Barishal.

I actively tried to seek out opinions from people, most were like meh...and as the match progressed, that 'meh' became a good thing Chittagong aren't in it...no way would they have turned in that sort of a performance.

No riots, no tears, no mention...paying fans have clearly moved on from the controversy - obviously those of us on the net, haven't and won't.

i_1_primeval_man
February 28, 2012, 09:31 PM
Yup, I gotta be honest...the 20 odd thousand at the stadium today, didn't give a damn about the whole controversy with Chittagong and Barishal.

I actively tried to seek out opinions from people, most were like meh...and as the match progressed, that 'meh' became a good thing Chittagong aren't in it...no way would they have turned in that sort of a performance.

No riots, no tears, no mention...paying fans have clearly moved on from the controversy - obviously those of us on the net, haven't and won't.

It's because there was no Chittagong Kings fans in the stadium yesterday. It's hard to move on if you are at the wrong end of justice.

Naimul_Hd
February 28, 2012, 09:46 PM
It's because there was no Chittagong Kings fans in the stadium yesterday. It's hard to move on if you are at the wrong end of justice.

I think justice has been served fair and square. Mike Proctor the ICC match referee and Technical committee member, himself clarifies the situation. Even after that if you want to believe CTG was wrongfully forced out then, its up to you.

Procter explained that the confusion arose because there were two clauses: one concerning a situation in which three teams were equal on points (21.8.2) and one referring to a similar situation with two teams (21.8.1). The former was used to decide Dhaka's qualification, which left Chittagong and Barisal level, meaning clause 21.8.1 would come into effect and Chittagong's win against Dhaka would not be counted.



"Because they ended up with the most points Dhaka were taken out of the equation," Procter said. "Two teams were left. So you could not have a head-to-head between three teams, but only two."


http://www.espncricinfo.com/bangladesh-premier-league-2012/content/current/story/555589.html



The bold part is what we need to focus. This is where all the misunderstanding are created. Its a common sense really, however, seems like majority of people missed that.

i_1_primeval_man
February 28, 2012, 10:30 PM
I think justice has been served fair and square. Mike Proctor the ICC match referee and Technical committee member, himself clarifies the situation. Even after that if you want to believe CTG was wrongfully forced out then, its up to you.



The bold part is what we need to focus. This is where all the misunderstanding are created. Its a common sense really, however, seems like majority of people missed that.

Mike Proctor would say whatever the technical committee would ask him to say. A wrong is not going to be right even if Mike Proctor says it. I'll have to repeat myself. It was a 3 way tie break, not a 2 way. Please read carefully what 21.8.2 states:

"When three (3) or more teams finish with equal points and equal wins in the league, then the team(s) which was (were) the winner of the most number of matches played between those equal teams in the league will be placed in higher position(s)."

It's a multiway tie break. So apply this clause of law and see what the standings are:
DG 3 win out of 4
Ck 2 win out of 4
BB 1 win out of 4

The clause clearly talks about teams being placed in higher positions. Who do we have in the higher positions (not position)? DG followed by Ck. Problem solved, case dismissed.

Now why would you wanna conveniently go back to 21.8.1 if you don't have any vested interest when the problem is already solved?

You legally cannot apply two different rules for 3 teams in the same situation.

Zunaid
February 28, 2012, 10:37 PM
^^^ That's exactly how I parsed it. There is NO ambiguity.

I wrote in post #30:

A proper parsing leaves no ambiguity. The ranking amongst the tied teams is predicated by the "winner of the most number of matches amongst themselves". Here the anaphora "themselves" clearly refer to the most immediate applicable noun phrase "these equal teams" which in term is defined a priori as "3 or more teams with equal points".

QED.

Unfortunately, the way the by laws are written - the other clause gave them an escape clause.

Fazal
February 28, 2012, 10:41 PM
To Gladiator fans... don't sleep tonight.

By the time you wake up, you will find out that BCB already announced the champion during midnight meeting.

i_1_primeval_man
February 28, 2012, 10:45 PM
^^^ That's exactly how I parsed it. There is NO ambiguity.

I wrote in post #30:



Unfortunately, the way the by laws are written - the other clause gave them an escape clause.

Really? I don't think there's a escape clause for them the way the by laws are written should CK wish to pursue the matter in the court.

Zunaid
February 28, 2012, 10:50 PM
Really? I don't think there's a escape clause for them the way the by laws are written should CK wish to pursue the matter in the court.

I meant it gave them an excuse escape clause. I do not think it gives them a legal escape clause. When interpreting laws, courts always look for the intent of a law to resolve ambiguity. As written, the first clause was clear in it's intent. How to resolve tie breaks amongst 3 or more teams tied on points.

i_1_primeval_man
February 28, 2012, 10:53 PM
I meant it gave them an excuse escape clause. I do not think it gives them a legal escape clause. When interpreting laws, courts always look for the intent of a law to resolve ambiguity. As written, the first clause was clear in it's intent. How to resolve tie breaks amongst 3 or more teams tied on points.

Here, here Naimul_hd, see what the wise man is saying. Mike Proctor who?

playmaker
February 28, 2012, 11:34 PM
Whatever is said

Injustice is done to CTG. Half of BCites are not supporters of CG so you dont care what has been done to them

IF it was BB or even KRB you guyz would have all protested in the streets

THIS IS CALLED PARTIALITY!

Night_wolf
February 28, 2012, 11:47 PM
Whatever is said

Injustice is done to CTG. Half of BCites are not supporters of CG so you dont care what has been done to them

IF it was BB or even KRB you guyz would have all protested in the streets

THIS IS CALLED PARTIALITY!

100% here support Bangladesh, Not BB or KRB or DG

so no IF it was BB or even KRB there wouldn't have been any protest..people didn't care who is in the final or not as F6_Turbo found out in the Stadium

Naimul_Hd
February 28, 2012, 11:50 PM
Here, here Naimul_hd, see what the wise man is saying. Mike Proctor who?

Here i accept my defeat in argument.

We ask BPL officials to make laws, the BPL officials ask 'The Boss'.

MohammedC
February 28, 2012, 11:55 PM
100% here support Bangladesh, Not BB or KRB or DG

so no IF it was BB or even KRB there wouldn't have been any protest..people didn't care who is in the final or not as F6_Turbo found out in the Stadium

I am 100% Bangladesh Cricket Fan

I am 100% Abahani Fan.

I am 100% Sylhet Divisional Cricket Team fan

I am 000% Sylhet Royals fan. (BPL T-20) Because I have been WALTONNED