PDA

View Full Version : ODI 5 : BD vs Zim 2004


Pages : [1] 2 3

chinaman
March 13, 2004, 06:03 PM
Cricinfo Commentery (http://usa.cricinfo.com/db/NEW/LIVE/frames/BDESH_ZIM_ODI5_14MAR2004.html)

Banglacricket Chat (http://games.banglacricket.com/chat)

CricketNext Live (http://202.138.124.68/live2004/odi/ban_in_zim/banzimodi5/live.htm)

BTV Link (rtsp://real.homeviewbangladesh.com/encoder/btv.rm)

We urge our members and visitors to read the following threads:

If server is down (http://banglacricket.com/alochona/viewthread.php?tid=4741)

Posting Rules (http://banglacricket.com/alochona/viewthread.php?tid=4588)

Finally, let's go for that series.

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by Zunaid : Title rationalized and icon added]

Hasib
March 13, 2004, 06:12 PM
I already started a thread!!!

chinaman
March 13, 2004, 06:18 PM
I saw that after I posted this one. Anyway, really sorry to disappoint you this time, I like to pass on some messeges. May be next time you will have a head start.

Hasib
March 13, 2004, 06:19 PM
I posted mine before you did... now don't abuse ur power as a mod... coz mine is the original.

Hasib
March 13, 2004, 06:59 PM
For Bangladesh to win, we gotta bat 1st, get the upper order scoring well while not losing too many wickets for a slog at the end. When bowling, we have to rip through the weak Zimbabwean upper order and get Streak out early. If we can do that, inshallah we shold be able to win.

chinaman
March 13, 2004, 07:00 PM
Thank you Hasib. I really appreciate your understanding.

Orpheus
March 13, 2004, 08:26 PM
***K

BangladeshCricket
March 13, 2004, 08:32 PM
the weather is very bad. Not sure if they will have game today...nope sorry i just checked i guess it will be fine today..



[Edited on 14-3-2004 by BangladeshCricket]

AsifTheManRahman
March 13, 2004, 08:33 PM
....and this time no one ever cares...

however, when i use the same word with the same asterisks to refer to some U 19 indian captain who wasted a lot of time in a game, my post gets edited...

this also happened in the 4th ODI thread and surprisingly no moderator even noticed it...and this time someone used the word to refer to Sujon, our former captain, and not just a U19 indian captain

shaheen
March 13, 2004, 09:11 PM
is there anyone to confirm the fate of chacha? i wish he will not appear in today's game. Hope Rana will be there as well as Tarique still there. If tarique with injury then another Manju may replace him

babon
March 13, 2004, 10:31 PM
according to prothom-alo, chacha will play but team management is still undecided about rana.If he plays tomorrow, tareq will be droped.

fwullah
March 13, 2004, 11:25 PM
U 19 indian captain who wasted a lot of time in a game, my post gets edited


I don't know what you're talking about (I didn't read all the threads), but looking only at this thread, I believe that my fellow moderators did what they did is because we are obliged to moderate anything that is not Bangladeshi, and which may sometimes cause foreigners to think bad about us; as this is a pure Bangladesh cricket site, started by a Bangladeshi, maintained by a Bangladeshi, as well as moderated by Bangladeshis.

I don't know if my above words are confusing or not, but I believe that its in one of the posting rules or something.

BangladeshCricket
March 14, 2004, 12:01 AM
chacha playing dropping Tareq...this is insane.. with slow medium pacers in a pace friendly pitch..i guess management are not looking for any more win..or even a tough fight..we need atleast two pacers(medium) two open the attack or even in the mid overs. I don know, what you guys think?

Hasib
March 14, 2004, 12:13 AM
You know how they put Ashraful through rehibilitation? Maybe they should do something like that for Mahmud.

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 12:34 AM
Originally posted by AsifTheManRahman
....and this time no one ever cares...

however, when i use the same word with the same asterisks to refer to some U 19 indian captain who wasted a lot of time in a game, my post gets edited...

this also happened in the 4th ODI thread and surprisingly no moderator even noticed it...and this time someone used the word to refer to Sujon, our former captain, and not just a U19 indian captain


You wrote those words without asterics and got edited followed by my post asking for it's necessity.

In the 4th odi thread, the poster edited it and you choose to quote the whole post knowing that it doesn't look good. And yes, it was noticed.

You continue to complain about editing your posts which contained some so called banned word. I don't know why you are doing it or what you are trying to gain from it, but, please make no mistake, we'll continue to edit those words once we spot it and we'll take some remedial action in the future for repeat violations.

We have members and visitors from wide range of age groups. This is a G rated forum and we intend to keep it that way. And sure, we need co-operation from all of you. Thank you.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 12:40 AM
Lets start with God's name. This gonna be the start of our series win.
Good Luck Bangladesh.
Good luck every single player of them (even sujon if he plays).
Go......Tigers.............................:tiger: :tiger:

Carte Blanche
March 14, 2004, 01:29 AM
Why would they drop Tareq? He was one of the heroes of the 3rd ODI. He drew the first blood on the 4th ODI too. I admit his bowling was a bit wayward in the latter stage of the match, but I don't think he deserves to be dropped. Besides Sujon bowled pathetically on the 4th ODI, and managed a duck with the bat. This is absolutely ridiculous. Good luck Bangladesh, with 10 men.

Hasib
March 14, 2004, 01:34 AM
Don't u mean 5 men... coz Mahmud counts as -5...

reinausagi
March 14, 2004, 02:11 AM
Don't u mean 5 men... coz Mahmud counts as -5...


LOL!

Man has a George Foreman complex in the making.

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:26 AM
From espn or BTV,cause they should move to the ground for broadcasting right at this moment

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:28 AM

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 02:29 AM
Does it start at 1:30am today too?

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:29 AM

abhs
March 14, 2004, 02:30 AM
Bangladesh won the toss

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:30 AM

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:30 AM

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 02:31 AM
we are not good at chasing runs. 3 out of 4 win came from batting first

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:31 AM
will see what's going on..

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 02:32 AM
they r going to feild

abhs
March 14, 2004, 02:33 AM
Ban 0.2 over 0/0

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:35 AM
Keep us updated..thanks.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 02:35 AM
according to the info in chat room, rafiq is not playing today!!!

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:36 AM
any one watching this match?

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:36 AM

abhs
March 14, 2004, 02:36 AM
After 1 over 3/0

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:37 AM
cricinfo not updating.. psl send us url for any other source you may have...thanks a million..

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 02:37 AM
Originally posted by AgentSmith
according to the info in chat room, rafiq is not playing today!!!

that is quite a shocker

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:38 AM

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:38 AM
1.1/3overs

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:39 AM
Manjurul Islam Rana replace Rafique

rafiq
March 14, 2004, 02:39 AM
Where's Rafique, and Rana is opening with Hannan to come later? Or has Rana replaced Hannan and crickinfo has it wrong. Anyway, as long as Sujon gets to play, we are all happy. heck, he should open.

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:39 AM

abhs
March 14, 2004, 02:39 AM
www.cricketnext.com is updating.

Bangladesh team, Alok Kapali, Manjural Islam, *Habibul Bashar, Rajin Saleh,
Mohammad Ashraful, Mushfiqur Rahman, +Khaled Mashud,
Khaled Mahmud, Hannan Sarkar, Tapash Baisya, Tareq Aziz

Rafikq is not there and Sujon is playing

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:40 AM
Originally posted by sohasan
cricinfo not updating.. psl send us url for any other source you may have...thanks a million..

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:40 AM
8/1.4

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:41 AM
Originally posted by mirjahan
8/1.4

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:43 AM
now cricinfo is very active

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:43 AM

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 02:43 AM
Very Interesting and Risky.

If Rana can play and survive like Test matches, it will be an interesting day.

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:44 AM
Why Chacha is in the team... we should send him to open..

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 02:44 AM
why rafiq is not playing..any one know if he is inj?

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 02:46 AM
i think raf not playing is a good thing.

We dont wann over use our only best player

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:46 AM
Rana is very quit

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 02:46 AM
Khaleej Times (http://66.234.3.30/cricket/scores_package_khaleej/scorecard_frame_kt.asp?filename=zmba1403.xml&match_type=ODI&venue_id=59&tm1=Zimbabwe&tm2=Bangladesh)

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:47 AM
Is it working for anyone?

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:47 AM

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 02:48 AM
Raana with Hannan! I love this combo. Missed Rafique though.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 02:48 AM
Originally posted by sohasan
Is it working for anyone?

nop..it's not working with me either!

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 02:48 AM
6

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 02:48 AM
What a shot 6

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 02:49 AM
66666666666666666!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 02:49 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Raana with Hannan! I love this combo. Missed Rafique though.

On top of it, this is a LHB and RHB combo....

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:49 AM
Originally posted by crickipagol
Khaleej Times (http://66.234.3.30/cricket/scores_package_khaleej/scorecard_frame_kt.asp?filename=zmba1403.xml&match_type=ODI&venue_id=59&tm1=Zimbabwe&tm2=Bangladesh)

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

they r so active and fast, but no commenntary

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 02:50 AM
Are they inspired by yesterday's pak-ind match?

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 02:50 AM
what a shot!!
welcoming he bowler:fire:

billah
March 14, 2004, 02:50 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Raana with Hannan! I love this combo. Missed Rafique though.

A shocker of sort, isn't it? Hannan is hot, inspired by the Indian innings and Inzi:)

mirjahan
March 14, 2004, 02:50 AM
http://66.234.3.30/cricket/currentmatches/zmba1403.htm

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 02:53 AM
Originally posted by sohasan
Why Chacha is in the team... we should send him to open..

rafiq is not playing because rana needed to be there and no one dared to cut off sujon, the stupid chacha.

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 02:54 AM
Raana to block and Hannan to Dhulai.

Rho
March 14, 2004, 02:55 AM
must win this one MUST!:fanflag:

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 02:55 AM
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Originally posted by sohasan
Why Chacha is in the team... we should send him to open..

rafiq is not playing because rana needed to be there and no one dared to cut off sujon, the stupid chacha.

I agree man he has links with you know who......

Banglatiger84
March 14, 2004, 02:56 AM
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 02:57 AM
good stategy "No wicket to Streak"

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 02:57 AM
Do u know why mgmt dont dare to cut off Chacha? ...

We want best 11 to be in the team....what is stopping us to choose best 11?



Originally posted by chinaman
Raana to block and Hannan to Dhulai.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 02:57 AM
4 from ranaa

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 02:57 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Raana to block and Hannan to Dhulai.

Who is for dhulai? Getting confused here...

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 02:58 AM
Originally posted by Banglatiger84
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

Bashing Sujon, may be?

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:58 AM

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 02:58 AM
Originally posted by Banglatiger84
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

What he spend the night out side????

billah
March 14, 2004, 02:58 AM
Heath is already getting too much respect. I think we need to take him to the cleaners, so his confidence is shaken up before batting.

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 02:58 AM

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 02:58 AM
wah...441 from three balls:fanflag:

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 02:59 AM
Originally posted by billah
Heath is already getting too much respect. I think we need to take him to the cleaners, so his confidence is shaken up before batting.

To do that we need somebody who can bat like inzi but we don't so better show respect....

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by akabir77]

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 03:00 AM
Originally posted by akabir77
Originally posted by Banglatiger84
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

What he spend the night out side????

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 03:00 AM
Six, that kind of dhulai!

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:01 AM
Originally posted by Banglatiger84
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

If this is true, it would be a low point of the tour.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 03:02 AM
Originally posted by Banglatiger84
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

what happend? this is really bad.

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:02 AM
Originally posted by billah
Originally posted by Banglatiger84
according to Athar ali khan rafique was "disciplined" by the team management, andhas been sent back to dhaka

If this is true, it would be a low point of the tour.

do u have anymore details on that?

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:03 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Six, that kind of dhulai!

Rana is also gettin' some action:)

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:05 AM
Some of his good performances were nothing but flukes.

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:07 AM
Don't wanna jinx it, but this is the largest opening partnership for us in the series.31/0:)

abhs
March 14, 2004, 03:07 AM
Bowling change!
G Brent in for Hondo

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by abhs]

MaBuKa
March 14, 2004, 03:07 AM
Originally posted by Hasan
Some of his good performances were nothing but flukes.
May be it's not true

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:07 AM
Originally posted by Hasan
Some of his good performances were nothing but flukes.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 03:07 AM
Originally posted by abhs
Bowling change!
G Brent in for Hondo

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by abhs]

i really liked hondo's bowling so far. lol.

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:08 AM
can any one tell me how can the batsmen change the strike while there was no run?


6.1 Streak to Hannan Sarkar, no run
6.1 Streak to Manjural Islam Rana, wide: no run

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:08 AM
Who is actually bowling, brent or Ervine?

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:08 AM
Ervine.

abhs
March 14, 2004, 03:08 AM
Sorry, Ervine in according to Cricinfo. Cricketnext showed as G BRENT

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 03:09 AM
whats goin on with rafiq...?.. is he really kicked out ..
why!!!!!!! how
appreciate if any one can give more detail...

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:09 AM
Ervine in bowl now..i liked Hondo bowling:P

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:10 AM
Hondo went for 7+ per over.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:11 AM
Originally posted by billah
Hondo went for 7+ per over.

thats why we liked him to bowl:)

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:13 AM
Actually, I think he is better than Ervine. Heath is throwing wides now. I hope he is feeling dizzy.:D

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 03:14 AM
Originally posted by skchandon
whats goin on with rafiq...?.. is he really kicked out ..
why!!!!!!! how
appreciate if any one can give more detail...

Please read earlier posts in this thread.

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:14 AM
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:14 AM
if this partnership carry on upto 20 overs we will have a good total in the end, i guess

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 03:14 AM
Mahmud is such an amazing player that the team is built around him. If they could, they'd drop Sumon just so Shujon can play (and not whine about it and forcing us to read faltu columns in the papers).

Rafique was desciplined ? Why ? Sounds like a lame excuse to keep chacha in the team. :)

Shujon 'bhai' onek korse and he should have retired last year. Rafique na thakle aaro koto option chilo, did we really need to play shujon ?
(every time I post against chacha, he does his little dance and scores the mandatory 20-odd and takes a wickets just so he can stay in the team)

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by tehsin]

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:14 AM
Cricinfo: 8.4 Streak to Manjural Islam Rana, no run, full length on the pad,
shaping into the batsmen, rape

What is this?

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:15 AM
huh

8.4 Streak to Manjural Islam Rana, no run, full length on the pad,
shaping into the batsmen, rape

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 03:16 AM
Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

so Rana is ur school mate..? which school were u in..

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by skchandon]

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:17 AM
Originally posted by skchandon
Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

so Rana is ur school mate..? which school were u in..

Khulna Zilla School.

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by skchandon]

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 03:19 AM
Originally posted by Hasan
[quote]Originally posted by skchandon
[quote]Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

so Rana is ur school mate..? which school were u in..

Khulna Zilla School.


so what kinda player is he.. any idea..
supposing uv seen him upclose..
and wht yr u guys graduated HSC

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:19 AM
Good strategy: if not streak econ rate will be 7 :lol:

abhs
March 14, 2004, 03:22 AM
Bulletin of Cricinfo: Bangladesh left out Mohammad Rafique, probably their best bowler, due to disciplinary reasons. He was replaced by Manjural Islam Rana.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:24 AM
Hannan Streak re 4 pitaise....fata fati

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:24 AM
10.4 Streak to Hannan Sarkar, FOUR


what kind of commentary is that :duh:

sajjadul
March 14, 2004, 03:26 AM
Bhai shob, jodi amader opening juti 100 niya jite pare taile kalke bad asor amar bashai milad, apnara shobai aishen.

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:26 AM
Originally posted by akabir77
10.4 Streak to Hannan Sarkar, FOUR


what kind of commentary is that :duh:

the crapinfo type

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:26 AM
[quote]Originally posted by skchandon
so what kinda player is he.. any idea..
supposing uv seen him upclose..
and wht yr u guys graduated HSC [/quote

I wrote a comment about Rana during the test match. You can have a look at that.
I passed my HSC from Dhaka college and Rana from Notre Dame college.

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by Hasan]

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 03:26 AM
Bangladesh left-arm spinner Mohammad Rafique has been sent home for disciplinary reasons, team management said. He is replaced in the side by Manjural Islam Rana.

Zimbabwe are without all-rounder Andy Blignaut, who has a recurrence of the thigh strain he suffered in the first test, while opening batsman Mark Vermeulen was left out due to doubts about his fitness, a Zimbabwe Cricket Union media statement said.

Medium pacer Douglas Hondo and batsman Stuart Matsikenyeri return to the Zimbabwe side.

Source: Reuters (http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=YBWBNZJERVNUICRBAE0CF FA?type=cricketNews&storyID=4562132&section=news)
:fanflag:

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:27 AM
easy boy


11.3 Brent to Manjural Islam Rana, no run, good length delivery, pitched
outside the off stump and moving away late, Rana pushes at it and
gets beaten

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:27 AM
I think cricinfo just changed its commentrator... ;-)

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 03:27 AM
We went in with 9 players who can bat (Pilot is dependable and shujon gets lucky from time to time) and on occasion, I have seen tapash and tareq scoring some quick runs. So, if we play to plan, we can post a good total.

Our worry is going to be bowling. Tapash is dependable but tareq is irratic at times. Mushfiq and shujon are slow bowlers and shujon again has to rely on luck to get us any break at all. With rafiq gone, rana will spin for us and he could be expensive. In that case, Rajin and Alok can bowl a few overs. IMHO Rajin (the art timer) can prolly bowl better then shujon.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:29 AM
Originally posted by sajjadul
Bhai shob, jodi amader opening juti 100 niya jite pare taile kalke bad asor amar bashai milad, apnara shobai aishen.

ho aitasi...milader menu ki? age menu janiye dao:cool:

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:31 AM
men shujon is the the biggest mistake in banglaeshi cricket!

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:31 AM
medium pacers doing the damage....2 maiden back to back

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:32 AM
last 13 ball NO runs,

12.3 Ervine to Hannan Sarkar, no run, beaten! good length delviery,
pitched outside the off stump and shaping away late, batsman
compreshensively beaten
:duh:

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by dorbesh]

abhs
March 14, 2004, 03:33 AM
Two maiden overs

abhs
March 14, 2004, 03:34 AM
50/0

Good start

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 03:34 AM
rafiq re j ki discipline shekhaytese alla malum...
amar mone hooy internal politics koyra beta re bhagay dise..

kkakash
March 14, 2004, 03:34 AM
i would like to know more about rafique?? what discipline??

anything?

:-/

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 03:35 AM
Emad ... in 2004 and late 2003 ? yes.
There are other candidates for the biggest mistakes, how about durjoy ?

IN any case, I will back shujon till the end of the match. Unless he gets really lucky, he is not going to do much (the wicket's responding to medium pace so he may have a shot) and he should retire after the match. It will be both respectable and sensible.

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:35 AM
Originally posted by sajjadul
Bhai shob, jodi amader opening juti 100 niya jite pare taile kalke bad asor amar bashai milad, apnara shobai aishen.

Bhai thikana ki texsas koi? ami kintu bashi durey thaki na :lol:

Mridul
March 14, 2004, 03:35 AM
we need to score atleast 250 to win the match.....

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:35 AM
Originally posted by kkakash
i would like to know more about rafique?? what discipline??

anything?

:-/

We need to wait till tomorrow, through BD papers...

tensionEaachi
March 14, 2004, 03:35 AM
50 up in 14th over

50/0 - 13.2 over

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:37 AM
Are we paying more attention on player's respect (! which itself is questionable) than team's win ???

Sujon should be out. Period.

Originally posted by tehsin
Emad ... in 2004 and late 2003 ? yes.
There are other candidates for the biggest mistakes, how about durjoy ?

IN any case, I will back shujon till the end of the match. Unless he gets really lucky, he is not going to do much (the wicket's responding to medium pace so he may have a shot) and he should retire after the match. It will be both respectable and sensible.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 03:37 AM
Rana is the magician. he is the answer to our long lasting opener problem!!!

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:38 AM
At 31, Hannan is planning for his 50...

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:40 AM
15 over up no wkt cool :fanflag: :fire: :fire: :fanflag:

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:40 AM
hannan is in run after long time. hope he can show some performance today

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:40 AM
Originally posted by tehsin
Emad ... in 2004 and late 2003 ? yes.
There are other candidates for the biggest mistakes, how about durjoy ?

IN any case, I will back shujon till the end of the match. Unless he gets really lucky, he is not going to do much (the wicket's responding to medium pace so he may have a shot) and he should retire after the match. It will be both respectable and sensible.


I pretty sure that there player than him in the camp himself.

So he won us one match?what about the five years after that with and bowl?

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 03:40 AM
We still have bidyut and nafees to consider for the opening but have to say that playing rana as the opener was brilliant. Don't know if he should continue at this slot. If nothing else, Rana has proved himself to be both reliable and adaptable for the team. Ekhon opekkha shudhu or ball er ghurni dekhar.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:41 AM
end of 15 overs Bangladesh 56/0..so far so good

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 03:41 AM
toy amar mone hoytese (alla na koruk)
bangali johon porbo tohon ekkere jhare dhoyra porbo..
kothay ache na .. chagol e ki r onko jane...

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:43 AM
Hannan is the man aber chokh jurano 4...

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:43 AM
Originally posted by dorbesh
end of 15 overs Bangladesh 56/0..so far so good

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 03:44 AM
Originally posted by tehsin
We still have bidyut and nafees to consider for the opening but have to say that playing rana as the opener was brilliant. Don't know if he should continue at this slot. If nothing else, Rana has proved himself to be both reliable and adaptable for the team. Ekhon opekkha shudhu or ball er ghurni dekhar.

i agree, but nafees need bloom, and bidyut needs physical fitness. right now, even if temporary, i believe he is the solution.

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 03:45 AM
You guys missed my point .... I said I will back shujon up till the end of the match .... that should have been obvious.

As long as he is out there, we need him to perform so we can win.
Do I think he can do it ? NO.
Do I want him to do it ? For Bangladesh - YES.

(In my opinion, he should have been watching the game from his home in Dhaka. And he should have stayed retired)

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:45 AM
Originally posted by skchandon
toy amar mone hoytese (alla na koruk)
bangali johon porbo tohon ekkere jhare dhoyra porbo..
kothay ache na .. chagol e ki r onko jane...

amio atar voye asi..allah na koruk. amader middle order-ra jodi bhalo korte pare tahole 250+ howar kotha. dekhajak ki hoi

shaheen
March 14, 2004, 03:45 AM
good opening partnership growing up!
63/0 in first 15 overs:D:flag::flag::flag::flag::fire::fire::fire:: fire::fire::fire::fire::fire:

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:46 AM
Agree 100% with your opinion.

Originally posted by tehsin
You guys missed my point .... I said I will back shujon up till the end of the match .... that should have been obvious.

As long as he is out there, we need him to perform so we can win.
Do I think he can do it ? NO.
Do I want him to do it ? For Bangladesh - YES.

(In my opinion, he should have been watching the game from his home in Dhaka. And he should have stayed retired)

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:46 AM
We may have just found the solution to our opener problem.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:47 AM
Originally posted by shaheen
good opening partnership growing up!
63/0 in first 15 overs:D:flag::flag::flag::flag::fire::fire::fire:: fire::fire::fire::fire::fire:

15 over or 16 over?

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:49 AM
we might face problem when bowling as
1. tapash-fine
2. tariq - too expensive
3.- sjuon- who knows why he plays
4. mushfiq- the best bowler in the team now
5. Rana- not tested

other options (part time)
rajen, kapali, ash

we have to score big to defend with only two ballers.... :-/

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 03:49 AM
ey joke ta jara janen na tader jonno...
Sir e jigayse ko dehi..
ekta wall ache... wall e ek khan fak ache..
ohon wall er ekpashe ache 6 khan chagol..
to etta chagol fak dia onno side e gelega koyda chagol thaklo..?
student koy .. sir 0 ta..
sir: koss ki..
student: ha sir, chagol e ki r onko jane.. jokhon jay tohon dol bayndha jay..
...:lol:

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 03:50 AM
Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

Me too. Can u give some details

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:51 AM
For all those that like kicking Sujon around, his stats in ODIs are not that bad. Please check them. He is a member of the disappearing 5-year-ago team. He's gonna go away soon anyways. He bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs. Let's see how he does here. He played a vital role in our win in the first.

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:51 AM
Without Rafiq, our bowlers have to defend, extra 30-35 runs and 1-2 wickets.

Mridul
March 14, 2004, 03:51 AM
Originally posted by akabir77
we might face problem when bowling as
1. tapash-fine
2. tariq - too expensive
3.- sjuon- who knows why he plays
4. mushfiq- the best bowler in the team now
5. Rana- not tested

other options (part time)
rajen, kapali, ash

we have to score big to defend with only two ballers.... :-/



I agree with u

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:52 AM
Originally posted by skchandon
ey joke ta jara janen na tader jonno...
Sir e jigayse ko dehi..
ekta wall ache... wall e ek khan fak ache..
ohon wall er ekpashe ache 6 khan chagol..
to etta chagol fak dia onno side e gelega koyda chagol thaklo..?
student koy .. sir 0 ta..
sir: koss ki..
student: ha sir, chagol e ki r onko jane.. jokhon jay tohon dol bayndha jay..
...:lol:

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:53 AM
Originally posted by skchandon
ey joke ta jara janen na tader jonno...
Sir e jigayse ko dehi..
ekta wall ache... wall e ek khan fak ache..
ohon wall er ekpashe ache 6 khan chagol..
to etta chagol fak dia onno side e gelega koyda chagol thaklo..?
student koy .. sir 0 ta..
sir: koss ki..
student: ha sir, chagol e ki r onko jane.. jokhon jay tohon dol bayndha jay..
...:lol:


hahahahaha............nice jokeee

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:54 AM
Originally posted by billah
For all those that like kicking Sujon around, his stats in ODIs are not that bad. Please check them. He is a member of the disappearing 5-year-ago team. He's gonna go away soon anyways. He bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs. Let's see how he does here. He played a vital role in our win in the first.

how was his vital role? man he was a good player not any more. this is not charaty that we will let someone play just becuase he is close to retire or some thing.... man think about waugh he was playing good but not good enough to aussis status. and what r we doing charaty ????

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:54 AM
Originally posted by syedmahm
Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

Me too. Can u give some details

Which batch? I mean SSC

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:55 AM
what is our highest patnership?

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:55 AM
ZIM fielding very well and saving some runs from BD:(

our batsmen needs to make singles to keep runing the scoreboard!

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 03:56 AM
Originally posted by Hasan
Originally posted by syedmahm
Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

Me too. Can u give some details

Which batch? I mean SSC

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:56 AM
Originally posted by akabir77
we might face problem when bowling as
1. tapash-fine
2. tariq - too expensive
3.- sjuon- who knows why he plays
4. mushfiq- the best bowler in the team now
5. Rana- not tested

other options (part time)
rajen, kapali, ash

we have to score big to defend with only two ballers.... :-/

Rana - has been tested, does pretty good.
Sujon - Bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs.
Mushfiq - Medium pace is the slowest of them.

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 03:57 AM
Please do not use more than ten emoticons in one line. On a different note, use U2U or another thread for off topic discussions. Thank you.

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:57 AM
Originally posted by syedmahm
Originally posted by Hasan
Originally posted by syedmahm
Originally posted by Hasan
Its nice to see my fellow schoolmate back in action. Best of luck!

Me too. Can u give some details

Which batch? I mean SSC

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 03:57 AM
Originally posted by dorbesh
ZIM fielding very well and saving some runs from BD:(

our batsmen needs to make singles to keep runing the scoreboard!

agree

3 Brent to Hannan Sarkar, no run, good length delivery outside the
off stump, pushed wide of the gully fielder, good diving stop
there saves runs

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 03:58 AM

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:58 AM
66666666666666666!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 03:58 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Please do not use more than ten emoticons in one line. On a different note, use U2U or another thread for off topic discussions. Thank you.

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 03:58 AM
Originally posted by Emad03
what is our highest patnership?

this is the highest partnership, previous was 73

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 03:59 AM
18.5 Ervine to Hannan Sarkar, SIX, over pitch delivery, slash to point

billah
March 14, 2004, 03:59 AM
A wonderful opening, guys :)

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 03:59 AM
6

This was needed, ervine was getting too much respect...

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 03:59 AM
18.5 Ervine to Hannan Sarkar, SIX, over pitch delivery, slash to point

confused commentary

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 04:00 AM

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 04:00 AM

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:01 AM
These guys are selectively picking the loose ball to hit. After months and months of hearing it from everyone, they are doing it. Influenced by the India-Pak slogfest, I'm sure now.:P

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:01 AM
Originally posted by billah
Originally posted by akabir77
we might face problem when bowling as
1. tapash-fine
2. tariq - too expensive
3.- sjuon- who knows why he plays
4. mushfiq- the best bowler in the team now
5. Rana- not tested

other options (part time)
rajen, kapali, ash

we have to score big to defend with only two ballers.... :-/

Rana - has been tested, does pretty good.
Sujon - Bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs.
Mushfiq - Medium pace is the slowest of them.

Rana - has been tested, does pretty good. (good to know)
Sujon - Bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs. (may be but that is in past not after whitemore took charge, so that doen't count anymore, please do an analysis from last year and chk who is better)
Mushfiq - Medium pace is the slowest of (the best bowler for me as he takes wicket and chks run, and sujon is same kind bowler but in the same match where he is bowling well shujon gives run and can't take wkt, thats what kills me why one can do the other can't... may be to aged????)

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:01 AM
Originally posted by sohasan


it's too early to say...kintu amra ashay bok badhte pari. we will have a good chance if our middle order does well

Hasib
March 14, 2004, 04:01 AM
Originally posted by sohasan


way too early... we are not even half way through our innings. But hopefully, inshallah we will win...

pagol-chagol
March 14, 2004, 04:01 AM
is it our best opening ever

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 04:02 AM
Originally posted by sohasan



not yet man
another 80 overs to be bowled!

BD Tigers
March 14, 2004, 04:02 AM
Hi guys, morning here. Cudn't get up...damn alarm..

Anyway, anybody knows what happened to Rafiq? why he is not in the team?

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:02 AM
This RR is perfectly alright at the moment.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 04:02 AM
Originally posted by billah
Originally posted by akabir77
we might face problem when bowling as
1. tapash-fine
2. tariq - too expensive
3.- sjuon- who knows why he plays
4. mushfiq- the best bowler in the team now
5. Rana- not tested

other options (part time)
rajen, kapali, ash

we have to score big to defend with only two ballers.... :-/

Rana - has been tested, does pretty good.
Sujon - Bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs.
Mushfiq - Medium pace is the slowest of them.

rana succeeded in every test. he'll in bowling too.

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 04:03 AM
Zimbabwe is missing Blignaut and from the way Streak is using his bowlers, doesn't look like there is much spin in the wicket. He is holding onto Price.

When we bowl, we'll hopefully have a good total to defend and tareq and the gang will try to keep the extras to under 10. If Mushfiq and Shujon can keep the line and lenght, we can make life difficult for the zimbs.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 04:03 AM
does anyone knows the best opening partnership for us?

we gonna break that today. inshaallah.

Mridul
March 14, 2004, 04:04 AM
78/0 after 20 overs.... its just GREAT .... i hopw we wont colapse later on

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 04:04 AM

pagol-chagol
March 14, 2004, 04:05 AM
i hope he is not nervous like others

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:05 AM
Originally posted by Mridul
78/0 after 20 overs.... its just GREAT .... i hopw we wont colapse later on

i truly hope tooo

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:06 AM
Originally posted by tehsin
Zimbabwe is missing Blignaut and from the way Streak is using his bowlers, doesn't look like there is much spin in the wicket. He is holding onto Price.

When we bowl, we'll hopefully have a good total to defend and tareq and the gang will try to keep the extras to under 10. If Mushfiq and Shujon can keep the line and lenght, we can make life difficult for the zimbs.

i agree with you

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 04:06 AM
Originally posted by AgentSmith
does anyone knows the best opening partnership for us?

we gonna break that today. inshaallah.

I told u, we already did. It was 73 before. Javed and suman

skchandon
March 14, 2004, 04:06 AM
Great opening...
only that can be said for sure.. rest could not be forcasted at this moment and I would not dare to anticipate either cause Bangladesh cricket team knows how to mess up a good one..(God forbid that it happens this time..series win series win..plzz plzz)

BD Tigers
March 14, 2004, 04:06 AM
need to rotate the strike..why wasting balls like that...

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:06 AM
Originally posted by akabir77
good. (good to know)
Sujon - Bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs. (may be but that is in past not after whitemore took charge, so that doen't count anymore, please do an analysis from last year and chk who is better)
)

Rafiq's ODI career is very very long. He just recently started playing Tests where he did good. His ODI bowling has been spotty all along. Please check.:)

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 04:07 AM
Originally posted by Nijhum
Originally posted by AgentSmith
does anyone knows the best opening partnership for us?

we gonna break that today. inshaallah.

I told u, we already did. It was 73 before. Javed and suman

sorry nijhum apa, i missed ur post.

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:07 AM
i think we have highest partnership between biddut and opi, the partnership was morethen 100 i guess. i am not really sure if the partnership was an opening!

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 04:08 AM
but javed still holds the record partnership for 2nd (163: highest for any wicket) and 3rd wicket(130)

abhs
March 14, 2004, 04:08 AM
50 for Hannan.
Congratulations!

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:08 AM
Originally posted by billah
Originally posted by akabir77
good. (good to know)
Sujon - Bowls better than Rafiq in ODIs. (may be but that is in past not after whitemore took charge, so that doen't count anymore, please do an analysis from last year and chk who is better)
)

thanks but can u tell who bowled better in last six/ seven months?

Rafiq's ODI career is very very long. He just recently started playing Tests where he did good. His ODI bowling has been spotty all along. Please check.:)

sohasan
March 14, 2004, 04:09 AM
:fanflag:

chinaman
March 14, 2004, 04:09 AM
Highest Oppening Partnership in ODI for Bangladesh:

170 Shahriar Hossain & Mehrab Hossain Bangladesh v Zimbabwe Bangabandhu National Stadium, Dhaka 1998/99

Source >>> (http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk/Archive/Records/Bangladesh/Odis/Highest_Partnerships.html)

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:09 AM
Originally posted by dorbesh
i think we have highest partnership between biddut and opi, the partnership was morethen 100 i guess. i am not really sure if the partnership was an opening!

i agree...

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:10 AM
that was bye run! not from hanna's bat

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:10 AM
Originally posted by sohasan
:fanflag:

r u shure? cric info shows 48

abhs
March 14, 2004, 04:11 AM
no already

85/0 in 22.0 overs, Hannan 51

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 04:11 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Highest Oppening Partnership in ODI for Bangladesh:

170 Shahriar Hossain & Mehrab Hossain Bangladesh v Zimbabwe Bangabandhu National Stadium, Dhaka 1998/99

Source >>> (http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk/Archive/Records/Bangladesh/Odis/Highest_Partnerships.html)

And we lost that match :(

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 04:11 AM
Originally posted by akabir77
Originally posted by sohasan
:fanflag:

r u shure? cric info shows 48

cricketnext i mean.

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by AgentSmith]

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:12 AM
Originally posted by abhs
no already

85/0 in 22.0 overs, Hannan 51

whats u r source?

abhs
March 14, 2004, 04:12 AM
90/0 now, Hannan 54

abhs
March 14, 2004, 04:13 AM
www.cricketnext.com

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:13 AM
cricinfo stuck:(

if hannan made 50 then congrates to him

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 04:14 AM
Originally posted by chinaman
Highest Oppening Partnership in ODI for Bangladesh:

170 Shahriar Hossain & Mehrab Hossain Bangladesh v Zimbabwe Bangabandhu National Stadium, Dhaka 1998/99

Source >>> (http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk/Archive/Records/Bangladesh/Odis/Highest_Partnerships.html)

oops, sorry. I got a stale statistics

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:14 AM
yes 50 :fire:

sajjadul
March 14, 2004, 04:15 AM
Originally posted by sajjadul
Bhai shob, jodi amader opening juti 100 niya jite pare taile kalke bad asor amar bashai milad, apnara shobai aishen.

Bhai shob, Milad diya to mone hoi faisha gelam. Jai hok, koisi to koisi. apnera aishen. Toi asha ase ekhono aro 10 ran koron lagbo.

Rubu
March 14, 2004, 04:16 AM
oops, sorry. I got a stale statistics. i posted that in chat room... so guess what..

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by AgentSmith]

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:16 AM
Bangladesh record first wicket partnership is170, 98-99, Dhaka, Opee and Shahriar.

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:18 AM
Our only ODI century, by Opee

BD Tigers
March 14, 2004, 04:18 AM
Does anybody know why Rafiq was dropped? And anybody is watching BTV over internet?

Nijhum
March 14, 2004, 04:19 AM
Originally posted by AgentSmith
oops, sorry. I got a stale statistics. i posted that in chat room... so guess what..

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by AgentSmith]

its so embarrassing, those were test stats. Since I can't access to the chat room, please plea guilty on my behalf

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 04:19 AM
Strike rate is very poor now, need to improve on that. Otherwise...........

hannan please go after ful ;)

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:20 AM
we need to speedup the scoreboard

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:20 AM
Originally posted by BD Tigers
Does anybody know why Rafiq was dropped? And anybody is watching BTV over internet?

no ather ali just said that he was send home because of disciplinary reasons and cricinfo also says that too

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:22 AM
Originally posted by crickipagol
Strike rate is very poor now, need to improve on that. Otherwise...........

hannan please go after ful ;)

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

Pagol bhai, strike rate is exactly where it should be for an imposing total. On the other hand, Hannan IS the dot ball king of our side in ODIs. What a do?

dorbesh
March 14, 2004, 04:23 AM
these batsman are set now..need some run!

syedmahm
March 14, 2004, 04:24 AM

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 04:24 AM
The goal set by Whatmore is (I believe, I read it in Prothom Alo, just now i remember), 160 by 40 overs. So now you can understand the pace of these 2 guys.:)


[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 04:25 AM
Our bats just need to have a session with McInnes so he can work on their rates. We are doing great but too many dot balls there. We could have crossed 100 by the 22-23 over.

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:25 AM
Originally posted by billah
Originally posted by crickipagol
Strike rate is very poor now, need to improve on that. Otherwise...........

hannan please go after ful ;)

[Edited on 14-3-2004 by crickipagol]

Pagol bhai, strike rate is exactly where it should be for an imposing total. On the other hand, Hannan IS the dot ball king of our side in ODIs. What a do?

Agree 199% :lol:

BD Tigers
March 14, 2004, 04:26 AM
Unbelievable on Rafiq report. I wonder what happened.

Anyway, the batsmen needs to start push for more runs rather than 2 runs/over.

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:27 AM
4 :fire:

abhs
March 14, 2004, 04:27 AM
This confirms the arrangement of Milad in Texas by Sazzadul. Wish Szzadul would not escape.

Yes, Bangladesh 100 without no loss already.

Now 101 /0 in 26. 2 overs

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:27 AM
Price is a quality bowler, I don't know why we arn't hitting Flower.

Mridul
March 14, 2004, 04:28 AM
96/0 after 26 overs...dont u guys think its very slow?

we might not score 250+...and eventually we have to lose this match

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:28 AM
hannans 100 up hurrey :fire:

crickipagol
March 14, 2004, 04:28 AM
Rana is catching up with Hannan's strike rate...humm

BD Tigers
March 14, 2004, 04:29 AM
Anybody notice how CrickInfo is doing the commentary...just telling us whether its a single, two or no run. No explanation. And checkout the Pak vs. Ind game. Its like story telling for each ball. Unbelievable...

billah
March 14, 2004, 04:29 AM
3rd ODI - 100 in 26.5
4th ODI - 100 in 28.1
5th ODI - 100 in 26.2, no loss.

Better!

Tehsin
March 14, 2004, 04:30 AM
Some of us were furious that rana was dropped from someone like Shujon. This makes it all worth while. Kothai ekta 19-20 bochorer uthti torun, o ke boshiye rekhe amra ekta has-been ke khelachchi.

Whatmore advised Rana to play his defensive game (which gave us respectibility in the test mtches). Rana is playing according to plan and if he is still standing around the 40th over, he'll go on the assault.

sadhat
March 14, 2004, 04:30 AM
Originally posted by BD Tigers
Anybody notice how CrickInfo is doing the commentary...just telling us whether its a single, two or no run. No explanation. And checkout the Pak vs. Ind game. Its like story telling for each ball. Unbelievable...
probably they are bored.

Emad03
March 14, 2004, 04:31 AM
H Sarker c Rogers b Price 59 99 4 2 59.6

Hasan
March 14, 2004, 04:31 AM

akabir77
March 14, 2004, 04:32 AM
Originally posted by tehsin
Some of us were furious that rana was dropped from someone like Shujon. This makes it all worth while. Kothai ekta 19-20 bochorer uthti torun, o ke boshiye rekhe amra ekta has-been ke khelachchi.

Whatmore advised Rana to play his defensive game (which gave us respectibility in the test mtches). Rana is playing according to plan and if he is still standing around the 40th over, he'll go on the assault.

agree chachar khutir jorey kheley parar khela teo ato boro SHOJON PRITI HOY na