PDA

View Full Version : Should Anamul Replace Someone Now?


al Furqaan
November 15, 2012, 05:16 PM
The NCL might be of negligible quality, however one thing that is emerging as fact is that consistent performers are likely ready to make the step up to Test level. Elias Sunny and now Sohag Gazi seem to prove that. While Jahirul Islam and Shuvogoto Hom might be cited as examples of how the NCL is deceptive, it should be noted that both Jahirul and Hom were single season hits, not consistent performers.

So the question is, should we bench SN and/or Junaid for likes of Anamul who is likely to struggle right now in the hopes that he can be a stalwart in our lineup in the near future? Or should we continue to groom him in a domestic FC league of disreputable quality and continue to groom him in non-existant A team and Academy tours?

Gowza
November 15, 2012, 05:23 PM
well i disgaree about shuvagata but that's not the question being asked here. i definitely think anamul should be given a chance in the test side either as opener or #3.

Umar
November 15, 2012, 05:35 PM
I think Bangladesh should always recruit TWO at the same time.

Last time I remember, Tamim and Junaid were recruited at the same time, and atleast ONE of them became regular at every level.

Then It was Shuvagoto and Nasir, and again one of them became regular at every level.

So I think, Bd should recruit Anamul and Mominul at the same time.

This provides competition between two in solidifying their position in the team, and usually one prevails.

Anamul can replace Junaid in test, and replace Ash in Odi and t20
Mominul can replace SN/Nazimuddin in all format

Gowza
November 15, 2012, 05:55 PM
might i add giving anamul his opportunity in his best format in home conditions especially since he just found some form is giving him the best possible chance to succeed at the international level. it would be a lot harder for him if he has to debut outside of home. plus the team is in the middle of one of the highest totals it's ever produced, so he'd be going into the team with a positive atmosphere around him which is much better, i'm sure we want him to have a positive and winning attitude with his cricket and a locker room that's just performed will do that.

oronnya
November 15, 2012, 06:01 PM
I think Bangladesh should always recruit TWO at the same time.

Last time I remember, Tamim and Junaid were recruited at the same time, and atleast ONE of them became regular at every level.

Then It was Shuvagoto and Nasir, and again one of them became regular at every level.

So I think, Bd should recruit Anamul and Mominul at the same time.

This provides competition between two in solidifying their position in the team, and usually one prevails.

Anamul can replace Junaid in test, and replace Ash in Odi and t20
Mominul can replace SN/Nazimuddin in all format

might i add giving anamul his opportunity in his best format in home conditions especially since he just found some form is giving him the best possible chance to succeed at the international level. it would be a lot harder for him if he has to debut outside of home. plus the team is in the middle of one of the highest totals it's ever produced, so he'd be going into the team with a positive atmosphere around him which is much better, i'm sure we want him to have a positive and winning attitude with his cricket and a locker room that's just performed will do that.

Agree with both of you.

22Yards
November 15, 2012, 06:09 PM
Anamul should have never been debuted in T20 because that is not his strong point. I think he is a longer format player whose class will make him a good in ODI's as well, and down the line, may be in T20s too. He won't get a better chance than this or should I say the selectors won't get a better chance than this debuting a youngster which this team badly needs at the top order. The pitch is a batting paradise, the batsmen are playing well and the conditions are ideal to take that chance. It goes without saying he won't do any worse than mofees or Junaid.

al Furqaan
November 15, 2012, 06:12 PM
well i disgaree about shuvagata but that's not the question being asked here. i definitely think anamul should be given a chance in the test side either as opener or #3.

Hom may have it, but we're not even certain Anamul has it - we just think he has a very good shot at having it. But if Hom keeps failing at NCL level it proves two things: perhaps he's doesn't have it and anyone left to groom at NCL level will regress his game. In my opinion, the NCL players shouldn't be left at NCL level longer than two full seasons as Sohel bhai says it reinforces bad habits. That being said, the quality of NCL cricket will gradually improve as the players' qualities improve themselves. 75% of the players are still club calibre players. And that number jumps to 90% when the national team boys leave for senior tours.

KaaL-PurusH
November 15, 2012, 06:18 PM
Let him learn more

Gowza
November 15, 2012, 06:44 PM
Hom may have it, but we're not even certain Anamul has it - we just think he has a very good shot at having it. But if Hom keeps failing at NCL level it proves two things: perhaps he's doesn't have it and anyone left to groom at NCL level will regress his game. In my opinion, the NCL players shouldn't be left at NCL level longer than two full seasons as Sohel bhai says it reinforces bad habits. That being said, the quality of NCL cricket will gradually improve as the players' qualities improve themselves. 75% of the players are still club calibre players. And that number jumps to 90% when the national team boys leave for senior tours.

of course we don't know for sure yet whether either of shuvagata or anamul have it, but both have been dominant in the NCL over the last couple of seasons. shuvagata has only played one match this current NCL and though he didn't get a century he did get a 50 so he hasn't failed completely, we'll see after this season where he is at, he wasn't too bad when he played those ODIs but hasn't got a chance since, of course if he does fail at NCL level then is quite possibly means he doesn't have it but he looked like he did in the ODIs and he's been consistent so far in the NCL. i agree that too much time purely in domestics can have a negative effect on the players.

WorldCup11
November 15, 2012, 06:54 PM
I have seen Anamul playing against Srilanka U19 And South Africa U19 in Under19 Worldcup recently. I got a feeling that he is a player of different league from rest of BD players, I felt , he can stay in the middle for longer time if he wants to. He is suitable for longer format of this game . I totally agree that he should get a chance in test team to replace Junaid/SN.

WorldCup11
November 15, 2012, 07:12 PM
Came back to add more observations :)

I saw Anamul got temperament to stay calm and send the right ball to boundary. Once he convert something to boundary ,those are delightful to watch, those are not like "jodi laigga zai type hit or miss". He only got out on both occasions when he tried to get runs quick (so he should not be in T20 for sure )

I also recorded his innings against South African decent fast bowlers, but didn't share it earlier as some people were making indecent comments from gallery (that also got recorded).

Gowza
November 15, 2012, 07:24 PM
i think we still think of anamul as the new kid on the block who is 15 or 16, he turns 20 in december, he's been on the domestic scene since 2008 so he's got 3-4 seasons of experience under his belt already. if we bring development of players from other countries into it, well i know it's rare in australia for players to debut for their state before they are 18. most are probably in their early 20s with a few exceptions. that's partly why aussie players don't get selected until their late 20s to early 30s because they come into state cricket at an older age, then by they time they've got some experience and developed they are a bit older.

it's different in BD, players debut young, they get experienced young, they come into the national team at a younger age. on one sense they've got a better chance of learning if they go in their a bit younger, as they aren't as set in their poor habits and just generally younger people tend to learn quicker. for example most likely it will be harder to develop nazimuddin's technique etc since he's in his late 20s on his way to 30s as opposed to the 19/20 year old anamul.

Zeeshan
November 15, 2012, 07:25 PM
even anamul doesn't like anamul as much as asaad loves him :smug:

translation: NO! If anything I'd change the pacers with Nazmul - yes, both for price of one, this is how bad they suck.

Max100
November 15, 2012, 07:31 PM
i think anamul is the best talent and he deserve chance in longer format. we have tendency of selecting players for wrong format. anamul definitely a longer version player, so is asif but anamul deserve chance first.

Max100
November 15, 2012, 07:32 PM
SN is the weakest link in the team and i dont think 9 batsman including sohag will help in bowling dept

TimAus
November 15, 2012, 08:29 PM
My only problem is that I don't think Anamul should be brought in as an opener, yet that is where the team needs him. I firmly believe that one of Junaid or Nafees should be dropped for Elias Sunny of Enamul Haq Jr to give the team more bowling strength (then move everyone in the order up 1) but if you then bring in Anamul for the other of those two he has to open. The other option is to open with Naeem, Riyad, Shakib or Nasir but I don't think any of those 4 should be openers. Perhaps Mush could open and give Anamul the gloves (thinking well outside the box). Down the line I think that it will be Tamim and Sarkar who form a long term opening partnership but Sarkar isn't ready yet.

Matribhasha
November 15, 2012, 09:33 PM
I think the only change should be Sunny in, and either of the 2 fast bowlers...out.

SNafees will come back, especially since he bats at # 3...and that the opposition attack is not that good. The longer the opening pair holds up, the odds of him doing better go up (maybe someone has the stats).

As for the opening...do not replace Zunaid by promoting someone up the order. That is a suicidal experiment. Just hope that he scores more than 7.

Maysun
November 15, 2012, 09:56 PM
Yes. Junaid or SN.

cricbook
November 15, 2012, 10:07 PM
yes...instead of zunaied...beta bounce khelte pare na mora pitche....

Tiger Manc
November 16, 2012, 01:17 AM
Would prefer him eased into the team. Firstly by playing the ODI warm up and then by playing the full ODI series. Then I want him to start as #3 against Sri Lanka in Tests.

deshimon
November 16, 2012, 02:02 AM
Anamul perform continuously not only one or two seasons. He perform with all the teams like A team, BCB XI, U19, NCL etc. So it's the best time for to include in National team. Last two rounds of NCL he scored centuries. Even current round he is doing his job excellently. One the other hand our top order of national team perform miserably. So there is no cause to avoid him at this moment.

shakibrulz
November 16, 2012, 06:07 AM
The slots available are #2 and #3. I would prefer him at #3, with Junaid dropping out and SN opening. SN could get his shots in against the new ball. Or maybe send Naeem at #3 and Anamul at #4.

M.H.Rubel
November 16, 2012, 06:15 AM
He will get a test call no doubt. But not sure about playing in 11. Another thing is Jahurul is his competitor mind it.

Isnaad
November 16, 2012, 06:19 AM
I want to see him play the 2nd test. He has done more than enough for a call and definitely is as ready as he can be.

BengaliPagol
November 16, 2012, 07:03 AM
Mominul Haque...

Fazal
November 16, 2012, 07:51 AM
Yes they shoudl bring Anamul and/or Mominul replacing aunaid and/or SN based on what they do in 2nd innings. We should bring atleat one of the two in 2nd TEST.

Max100
November 16, 2012, 12:17 PM
Would prefer him eased into the team. Firstly by playing the ODI warm up and then by playing the full ODI series. Then I want him to start as #3 against Sri Lanka in Tests.

So u think to get success in test,u need to be a good odi player.in that case, player who is mostly considered for test matches like azhar ali, laxman, samaraweera, justin langer, mark richardson, ashwell prince need to prove themselves in odi? Is that u think?

BANFAN
November 16, 2012, 05:24 PM
I like to see Anamul and Mominul, both are playing the practice match before ODI series.

Kana-Baba
November 16, 2012, 06:06 PM
Who knows, may be the big fat Akku chacha has told him to get prepared for #3 slot, just they way he told nayeem.

Nadim
November 16, 2012, 06:09 PM
Anamul was in the Asia cup odi squad, and i dont see any reason to drop him from there for the upcoming 5 odi's.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

BANFAN
November 16, 2012, 06:51 PM
Anamul was in the Asia cup odi squad, and i dont see any reason to drop him from there for the upcoming 5 odi's.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

Ya but didn't get any game...hope he gets to play this time.

RazabQ
November 16, 2012, 06:58 PM
Oh that reminds me. How about giving Akram Khan the credit for having the vision to identify a player for a slot and communicating far in advance to let the player get ready and then come in with some success. That is how good selectors work!

Dilscoop
November 16, 2012, 07:01 PM
Oh that reminds me. How about giving Akram Khan the credit for having the vision to identify a player for a slot and communicating far in advance to let the player get ready and then come in with some success. That is how good selectors work!
IKR. I was impressed when I read that report on Naeem Islam.

Tiger444
November 16, 2012, 07:09 PM
Oh that reminds me. How about giving Akram Khan the credit for having the vision to identify a player for a slot and communicating far in advance to let the player get ready and then come in with some success. That is how good selectors work!

Agreed. First time I've seen the selectors communicating with the players about putting them in certain positions. Hope that selectors continue to communicate with the players and talk about where they stand. It'll motivate these players a lot like the way it has motivated Naeem.

AsifTheManRahman
November 16, 2012, 07:10 PM
No credit until we win the WC. All or nothing. All or doom gloom.
<br />Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Dilscoop
November 16, 2012, 07:18 PM
I'm willing to open with Anamul and drop Big J @ 3 where he is best at. But Anamul wants number 3. So bring back Imrul.

BengaliPagol
November 16, 2012, 07:26 PM
Nafees doesnt deserve to get the axe just yet. He scored some sort of runs in the first innings so he might take some confidence out of that.

deshimon
November 17, 2012, 12:45 AM
Do you know why Junaid again in the team for second Test. Where he is flops but Anamul perform continuously good. Selectors said that they depend on experience though he can't perform. Anamul perform but selectors don't have confidence on domestic leagues. Then why domestic cricket?

KaaL-PurusH
November 17, 2012, 08:29 AM
Yeah bring him in. At least he cant do worse than current bunch

NoName
November 17, 2012, 08:43 AM
Yes! no more sn or js.

mali007
November 17, 2012, 08:58 AM
Selectors do not pick 1st eleven . Mainly coach and captain do that . May be Mushi does not want Amanul showing lame excuse of inexperience ! If Amanul click to cement his position his position would be in jeopardy !! (Mushi's captaincy and performances are not upto the mark).

WarWolf
November 17, 2012, 09:01 AM
I have a bad feeling that Anamul will be in the ODI team after SN and JS doing worse in second test. They will give Anamul 1/2 ODIs as opener and drop then.

Rifat
November 17, 2012, 09:05 AM
Anamul deserves a test cap and so does Mominul

WarWolf
November 17, 2012, 09:08 AM
Anamul deserves a test cap and so does Mominul
Both of them have better longer version records then shorter version.

I have another feeling that they would opt for the same time in the second test!

I should better follow euporean football league:goal::goal::goal::goal:

Night_wolf
November 17, 2012, 09:34 AM
yes this even a qus anymore, he can easyly replace mofees and lombu siddike, if JS and mofees are the fev player of our hasina apa and cant be dropped, anamul atm can even replace dare i say our captain