View Full Version : Rajjak vs. Rana

January 25, 2005, 12:50 PM
Lets hav a comparison... shall we?

Bowling-Probably gets more turn and bounce than Rana and probably is more likelty to take wickets too
Batting-Better Hitter than rana.. but isn't known to
But he isn't very well-known to be a batsman who can secure wicket at one end.

Bowling-Economic.. becomes a major wicket-taker only when the pitch helps.
Batting-Can stick to the wicket.. but slow scorer. His hitting ability is not well-known.

:flag:So who would u prefer for tomorrow's ODI??
I will take Rajjak... coz without Tapash.. we r gonna need one more blaster with the bat at the end of our linup! :cool:

What abuot you?

January 25, 2005, 12:58 PM

January 25, 2005, 01:00 PM
:D... one is going to.. for sure.

January 25, 2005, 01:07 PM
i wish i didnt have to choose one...cuz either of them are gona be ineffective tomorrow no matter who plays....

January 25, 2005, 01:07 PM
How Razzak is a "Better Hitter than rana". He was out without scoring facing the first delivery. Rana made 16 runs instead.
Although Razzak got 1 wckt, but conceded 51 runs from 8 overs, which is too much.

Edited on, January 25, 2005, 6:09 PM GMT, by Sam.
Reason: Correcting the name

January 25, 2005, 01:12 PM
Rana is better then Razzak

January 25, 2005, 02:04 PM
Razzak is a better bowler than Rana ...

January 26, 2005, 05:58 AM
:up: :flag::flag::flag::flag::flag::flag:

I thought he would be the wrong choice.. but he proved me wrong!!

Verry well done!

All other BD bowlers did very good today too!!

Congrats to everyone!! :up: