fwullah
February 14, 2005, 07:41 AM
One of the proposals of the ICC that they will be focusing on in the next meeting is letting Bangladesh play majority of their International matches at home.
While I have nothing against a 4-year-system for 8 big tests teams and 6-year-system for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe; but what will their proposal of playing only Home Tests mean?
It will force Bangladesh's development as a cricketing nation because of the following reasons:
1. In long term, Bangladesh will only be able to produce spinners and hence, not many quality fast bowlers will arise on the horizon
2. Batsman will find spinners to play way better than pacers
3. Not to mention the fact that our players will be clueless when they play against bouncers on bouncy pitches,
Because there simply won't be enough matches for our players to get themselves accounted to playing outside the subcontinent.
In one sentence, cricket will be doomed and the growth or the development of cricket that has been going on currently in Bangladesh, will be short-lived. Since we won't be playing away matches, so there won't be any reason for us to practice on conditions that are not suitable for our usual game play - on low bouncy & turning wickets.
One good example: Why is our current national league being played mostly on green wickets this season? Because we have an England tour coming up where pitches will be supposed to be green (well you get the idea) so we need to assess how our players will be able to cope with the situations overseas. If we did not have this England tour right now, if we had never been to Australia or South Africa before, then would we have identified our lack of adjustments to those top nations' wickets and conditions?
Answer is quite easy and simple. No.
While I have nothing against a 4-year-system for 8 big tests teams and 6-year-system for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe; but what will their proposal of playing only Home Tests mean?
It will force Bangladesh's development as a cricketing nation because of the following reasons:
1. In long term, Bangladesh will only be able to produce spinners and hence, not many quality fast bowlers will arise on the horizon
2. Batsman will find spinners to play way better than pacers
3. Not to mention the fact that our players will be clueless when they play against bouncers on bouncy pitches,
Because there simply won't be enough matches for our players to get themselves accounted to playing outside the subcontinent.
In one sentence, cricket will be doomed and the growth or the development of cricket that has been going on currently in Bangladesh, will be short-lived. Since we won't be playing away matches, so there won't be any reason for us to practice on conditions that are not suitable for our usual game play - on low bouncy & turning wickets.
One good example: Why is our current national league being played mostly on green wickets this season? Because we have an England tour coming up where pitches will be supposed to be green (well you get the idea) so we need to assess how our players will be able to cope with the situations overseas. If we did not have this England tour right now, if we had never been to Australia or South Africa before, then would we have identified our lack of adjustments to those top nations' wickets and conditions?
Answer is quite easy and simple. No.