PDA

View Full Version : Lowest test scores after 1990


mahbubH
March 4, 2005, 08:56 AM
46 England v West Indies Port of Spain 1993/94
47 West Indies v England Kingston 2003/04
51 West Indies v Australia Port of Spain 1998/99
53 *Pakistan v Australia Sharjah 2002/03
54 West Indies v England Lord's 2000
54 Zimbabwe v South Africa Cape Town 2004/05
59 Pakistan v Australia Sharjah 2002/03
61 West Indies v England Leeds 2000
63 Zimbabwe v West Indies Port of Spain 1999/00
66 India v South Africa Durban 1996/97
71 Sri Lanka v Pakistan Kandy 1994
72 Pakistan v Australia Perth 2004/05
73 New Zealand v Pakistan Lahore 2002
.
.
.
.
87 Bangladesh v West Indies Dhaka 2002/03


Edited on, March 4, 2005, 1:57 PM GMT, by sports_fan_bd.

Ahmed_B
March 4, 2005, 10:14 AM
Question 1: which team scored the run in each match?
Question 2: BD's lowest score(76) is in which position in the list?

mahbubH
March 4, 2005, 10:22 AM
>>> Question 1: which team scored the run in each match?
That is a good question. Hint. Same patteren is followed for all.

>>> Question 2: BD's lowest score(76) is in which position in the list?
When did we score 76? Sorry I cannot remember.

Ahmed_B
March 4, 2005, 10:42 AM
Originally posted by sports_fan_bd
That is a good question. Hint. Same patteren is followed for all.
That means each of the first team on the chart.
Originally posted by sports_fan_bd
>>> Question 2: BD's lowest score(76) is in which position in the list?
When did we score 76? Sorry I cannot remember.
I guess 76 is our lowest ODI score(still not sure)... anyway I was gonna ask about that 87, but mistakenly typed that one.

In what position is our 87 on that list?

Edited on, March 4, 2005, 3:44 PM GMT, by crickethorizon.

Spitfire_x86
March 4, 2005, 10:43 AM
76 is our lowest score in ODI, not in Test

Rubu
March 4, 2005, 11:49 AM
just a piece of info here, bd's lowest scores in both form of cricket is higher than the rest of the test playing nations!

(this info is not 100% confirmed, can anyone confirm this?)

mahbubH
March 4, 2005, 12:11 PM
More from BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/4318807.stm)

Edited on, March 4, 2005, 5:14 PM GMT, by sports_fan_bd.

DJ Sahastra
March 4, 2005, 12:24 PM
Without a doubt, BD has a strong tail that can easily add 50-odd runs anyday :).

Edited on, March 4, 2005, 5:25 PM GMT, by DJ Sahastra.

Ahmed_B
March 4, 2005, 12:50 PM
Nops DJ..

That 50 is usually BD's 5 top-order batsmen's combined score..
The tail usually adds another 100! ;)

mahbubH
March 4, 2005, 05:02 PM
Originally posted by AgentSmith
just a piece of info here, bd's lowest scores in both form of cricket is higher than the rest of the test playing nations!

(this info is not 100% confirmed, can anyone confirm this?)


Bangladesh's lowest score in test (87) is the higher than the lowest scores of the other teams, But in ODI, England beat us in this case.


35 (18 overs) Zimbabwe v Sri Lanka Harare 2004
43 (19.5 overs) Pakistan v West Indies Cape Town 1992/93
54 (26.3 overs) India v Sri Lanka Sharjah 2000/01
54 (23.2 overs) West Indies v South Africa Cape Town 2003/04
55 (28.3 overs) Sri Lanka v West Indies Sharjah 1986/87
64 (35.5 overs) New Zealand v Pakistan Sharjah 1985/86
69 (28 overs) South Africa v Australia Sydney 1993/94
70 (25.2 overs) Australia v England Birmingham 1977
70 (26.3 overs) Australia v New Zealand Adelaide 1985/86
76 (30.1 overs) Bangladesh v Sri Lanka Colombo (SSC) 2002
76 (27.3 overs) Bangladesh v India Dhaka 2003
.
.
.
86 (32.4 overs) England v Australia Manchester 2001

Akib
March 4, 2005, 07:55 PM
I agree. Bangladesh's tail is very good compared to other teams. They dont fold easily. Sometimes they are better than top order.

cricket_pagla_fan
March 4, 2005, 09:17 PM
well Bangladeh Has only one wealkness its the top order!:yawn:

bourny3
March 6, 2005, 05:24 AM
it is true :duck: