View Full Version : BD 11
July 20, 2002, 08:42 PM
So here is the Team Mr. Mohsin will play...
Ash is out, thats wise. But how can Akram be there!!! He wont score more than 30 runs total for the match. Even Sumit could contribute more as a bowler.
July 21, 2002, 11:16 AM
Why Akram is playing? They should've choose someone who is young. It was proved that youngs do better than the old ones.
July 21, 2002, 01:57 PM
It was proved ? When ?
Picking Akram over Ash wasn't really much of a choice, the hassle is why did we have to pick either/or ? Don't we have other players besides this two ?
July 21, 2002, 03:42 PM
Tushar Imran. Alsu sumit was a choice, he could get 1 wicket amd match the 20 run. (Standard comparision - 1 wkts = 20 runs).
July 21, 2002, 07:28 PM
Still don't understand why they won't take Nannu. Akram saved face only because the rest of them failed. Now, I don't know how much of an effect Nannu would have had but he would have tried harder then most.
Also, Sumit was definitely a choice. Why isn't Rafique in Sri Lanka ?
July 22, 2002, 09:24 AM
On this wicket, both Sumit and Rafiq should have been included. And definitly Nannu. I think BD people needs to wake up and shake BCB on this. Just like the WC, they have to force BCB to put Nannu in the team. People care, BCB doesnt.
July 22, 2002, 01:15 PM
..and er...why are you (Raj Mia) not a selector anywhere then..ACB or BCB ?
July 22, 2002, 01:40 PM
July 22, 2002, 05:29 PM
Apparently Mr. Maximillian thinks BD fans should not think about what BD 11 should be like because that's the selectors' job...and selectors are always right.
July 22, 2002, 09:13 PM
Finally, someone who supports BCBs AULA JHAULA selection. Well, since we can't vent our anger on them, we have Max so I have only one thing to say to you all - DHOR BETAREY (kidding bhai, don't mind us).
July 22, 2002, 10:15 PM
At first I said no Nannu in the national side. Now that I see Akram in the team, I say Akram out Nannu in, and this is fare for Bangladesh.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.