Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HereWeGo
why didnt they? cuz they did not need to before bangladesh was 4 down. And We did not win because of Raqibs innings, We won because of our bowling. There is no reason to believe that if SN played in his place than he wont have done better....
anyways my point was simple, the way Raqib played against Ireland is the only way he knows how to play. It was not because the situation demanded.
|
So the innings that Raqibul played did not help us win you say. The very fact that he was able to play like that makes him such a gem. Although you think that anyone could have done it then why did not Ashraful? Why did Shakib get out even when he knew that if he got out we would be in big and i mean BIG trouble? Batting sensibly is an art-form because not everyone can do it consistently.
Do you think that Ashraful could have played that inns that Raqibul played?
I have but one thing to tell you: Please understand the role of players who stabilize the inns. Please understand that, right now Raqibul is one those very few sensible players we have, who can do that for Bangladesh.