View Single Post
Old March 15, 2011, 04:24 AM
Ayan Ayan is offline
Club Cricketer
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Posts: 58

Why was the capacity reduced? Renovation couldn't be done without it (because more space was needed, etc.), or is 65k optimum because seats weren't filled to 90k often enough and upkeep was costly? There must be a good reason (although in the subcontinent there's not always one) because the stadium is iconic, and its seating capacity was part of its iconic stature.
Reply With Quote