June 27, 2011, 08:57 PM
|
 |
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: The Bible Belt
Favorite Player: Anamul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 19,373
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Avik
it should always be bottom 4 full members vs top 4 associates (winners and top teams of the world league). bottom 2 vs top 6 isnt fair.
though the game is progressing, ICC should only bring the best of the associates to the world cup, not as many as possible. top 4 of the associates get a chance, at 4 spots. much more competitive, and fair to all parties involved.
and the bottom 4 spots in the ICC has never been in doubt.. West Indies with their shabby form, NZ with their losing streak, Zimbabwe's rebellion, and of course our mediocrity ensured that.
the bottom 4 vs the top 4 of the associates cud become very interesting.
|
i agree...WI and NZ aren't much better than us, if any better at all. they should join the ranks of BD and ZIM.
__________________
Cricket cannot live with the mistaken belief that people want to see big hits. People like to see goals, but no one is talking of moving the goalposts a metre wider either side. (Harsha Bhogle)
|