View Single Post
Old August 24, 2011, 05:19 PM
Rinathq's Avatar
Rinathq Rinathq is offline
Join Date: January 1, 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Favorite Player: Mash, Riyad, Tamim
Posts: 5,871

Originally Posted by Crisis
We don't have that kind of aggressive bowling to take 20 wickets!
We don't have that kind of batting to make 400.

So, all we can hope for the time being are draws!
We dont have to make 400 runs in a single innings. A total of 550 in 2 innings is enough to pull of a draw or a close win if they can bat longer. So temperament is the issue.
Yes its true we dont have bowlers who aggressive enough to take 20 wickets. But its not impossible. Remember against India? If it wasnt for Shewag who declared with 1 wicket left, we could have taken 20 wickets quite easily. Having Shahadat is a plus point as he is more aggressive. But i feel like Shaiful isnt aggressive enough. Having a Shahadat- Rubel- Robiul. I found Robiul quite capable of performing well in test cricket.
Reply With Quote