View Single Post
  #30  
Old August 25, 2011, 11:09 AM
al-Sagar's Avatar
al-Sagar al-Sagar is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 22,320

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahnaf
i think man city actually paid more given nasri was in the last year of his contract whereas mata just signed a new deal with them before joining chelsea..and nasri's wage probably something like this £18000.. Im sure mata wont get anything like this..

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)
u r right ....

nasri being on the last year of his contract should not have cost more than 8 M pounds ....

he would been a free transfer after 12 months

arsenal did a good deal. but will they be able to buy a replacement ???
Reply With Quote