Originally Posted by ahnaf
i think man city actually paid more given nasri was in the last year of his contract whereas mata just signed a new deal with them before joining chelsea..and nasri's wage probably something like this £18000.. Im sure mata wont get anything like this..
Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)
u r right ....
nasri being on the last year of his contract should not have cost more than 8 M pounds ....
he would been a free transfer after 12 months
arsenal did a good deal. but will they be able to buy a replacement ???