Quote:
|
Originally Posted by maksud
Test cricket is bit different from exam. You can pass exam., if you have good preparation but you cannot win a test match if you dont have skill, experience, match practices etc. Thats why we won only 3 test matches (among 73) during last 12 years. If you add total sum we spent for our coaching staff it will easily cross million dollars. In return we get only 3 win with comparatively weak opponents.Now, from here to until 2020 we have only 42 test and if we spend almost same amount or more what will be our expected return. After every defeat we will blame lack of encounter with big team like Tamim did recently. Stuart Law also mentioned about this. My point is if we only spent for coaching staff and famous head coach it will not give us expected result. Coaching staff can increase our players skill at certain level but after that to win the real match we need more encounter with big teams. So we should concentrate on this point also.Otherwise after 8 years we have also the same result in test matches which are experiencing currently.
|
Then why do you think team like Australia, South Africa, India, Pakistan opt for well proven (local or foreign) full time coaching staffs ? They have at least 6-7 world class players, most of them are highly talented and skillful and can win matches single-handedly.
I agree coaching staff can increase skill at a certain level and players have to perform accordingly, but full time coaches job is to ensure players do remember and implement those skills properly each time. Moreover, in modern days, coach's job is not only to improve players skills, he has to find out right strategies/action plans based on opponent team's weaknesses. Now, if you want to rotate coaching staffs on part time basis how can you ensure to track down player's profile and team strategies/ plans and expect results ?
Sometimes, we have to look beyond 'short term result' and focus on development which can ensure long term benefits. And when our players are so vulnerable and lazy type, we just cant afford to leave them alone on their own. Students who are weak in the class, need more care and attention. Teachers cant ignore them thinking wasting their time and effort. Its a wrong approach.