Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Fine, but why give him two hundred grand now when you can give it to him when he becomes the highest wicket taker in the real WC seven years from now? The two grand was for each of the "top two performers" in the tournament and Taskin hadn't done much to help the team's cause there.
And if he's being awarded just for his potential, then that's just silly and premature, not to mention out of place given the context of a WC campaign that was a failure for him and his team.
I am sure the award was not for potential but for performance. As I stated earlier, u and I did not see what happened in the pitch. So we cannot judge. I am sure it was based on the report given by captain and coach. And 2 grand is really not a lot of money. Interns working in the west earn much more than that every month. And they have worked continuously for almost a year prior to the tournament.