Originally Posted by BANFAN
I think what Raynman is saying is instead of counting individual performances, we should be monitoring team performance indicators. Such as:
It appears as though not everyone is on the same intellectual plane as me
I'll try once again. Why not just look at the ICC rankings table then to look for improvement?
Why not dissect our rating points? 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.
Do you see the futility?
Instead focus on tangible and incremental things that lead to those zeros becoming 5s and the 5s becoming 20s and so on and so forth.
If you don't even know what to look for, how do you expect to find it?