[Fazal]

But here is my understanding what it said:

"One of them was Dhaka Gladiator coach Ian Pont. Tribunal urged the AKSU to know the details of their findings about (Pont). After not getting any response (from AKSU), the tribunal send letter to ICC three times, but failed to get any staisfactory response. The reason of not getting any information about Pont is later known. AKSU official Peter Osiye (??) and Ian Pont are close buddies."

The gist of the article I beleive is: The role of AKSU is in question and as an exmaple they provided Ian Pont's name. AKSU didn't bring any charge to few questionable people, but failed to explain their innosence with evidence. And thereby, even though some of them were not charged, there is still cloud in top of their head in tribunal judges' mind.

If I translated inaccurately or misunderstood the article , please don't sue me, I am just a messenger. I am just trying my best to respond to my dost's request, please pardon my lack of english language or lack of understanding a Bangla article.