After reading some aggressive posts in the thread, I suddenly had a revelation. Is it really what is mentioned above is true? May be there is some shortcoming in my perspective, may be I am missing the crux of the argument? Eyes wide open it is actually clear now -
1. Did I try to justify a SILLY Useless murder by the current thriving economy of a country?
2. Did I start to talk about current glory of a soccer nation to nullify a murder which also I consider a negligible mishap of the past?
3. While arguing did I accidentally start and continue undermining directly the person I am having discussion with?
I feel much safer now. My mind does not carry any love for anyone who is detrimental to humanity (which includes inappropriate use of cyberspace).
__________________
À vaincre sans péril, on triomphe sans gloire.
|