View Single Post
  #20  
Old September 27, 2016, 11:56 AM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,115

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rifat
Taskin was clearly banned for his slower bouncer. Conspiracy or not, it is unfair because the umpire/ICC could have just told him to not bowl the Slower bouncer and every other delivery Taskin bowls is perfectly legal.

For Constructive criticism, We should compare the Slower bouncer of all other prominent international bowlers vs. Taskin pre-ban and post ban slower bouncer delivery. If all of them are found to be exactly identical, then surely it was an Error on the Umpire/ICC/Chennai Testing facilities part. Only then we can say that it was possibly a conspiracy.
His slower ball bouncer is and was always his cleanest delivery. If that was the ball in question, it was an excuse.

Taskin's slow ball bouncer is a back of the hand delivery...ie like a leg spinner. How many leg spinner's have been accused of chucking? Its always finger spinners (Offies and SLAs) because the leg spin action is easie to bowl without chucking. Ajmal, Narine, Ojha, Gazi, Williamson, Utsyeta...they are all finger spinners.
__________________
Bangladesh: Our Dream, Our Joy, Our Team

#OneTeam1Dream
Reply With Quote