Quote:
Originally Posted by Arnab
About the real Hitler:
If the Indian government is allowing restaurants named Hitler with a Swastika sign to operate, it's really screwed up.
Hitler is an offensive name to the vast majority of the civilized Western population (not considering the neo-Nazis) for good reasons. Ideally, any mass-murderer should be viewed as such across all societies.
|
Not commenting on a 'closed' case, but I feel like giving my two cents here. If india feels somewhat owing to hitler, it would be understandable. the fact is, without WW-II, india would probably still be under british colony. if england would not be heavily damaged by ww-ii, it would probably take ghandhi's approach to get them out of india, in about say, another 200 years. now, thats what you call 'karo poush mash, karo shorbonash'