View Single Post
  #7  
Old January 3, 2007, 01:03 PM
pagol-chagol's Avatar
pagol-chagol pagol-chagol is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: September 19, 2003
Location: Web
Favorite Player: Bossman, Imran Khan, Viv
Posts: 4,029

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabir
Two years only? Don't be silly.

You're right about keeping them on the run. As long as they're on the run, they're gonna have to defend themselves. I think this bill won't go much further, but then again...you never know what will happen in the US. Many (if not most) thought they wont' end up going to the war in Iraq, but they eventually did.

IMO, this bill has the potential to charge these idiots using some loopholes. And violations of constitutions, foreign policies, Acts, and what not, should allow impeachment of the president in any constitution (which, then again, is the exact argument that's debated here). The immense power that Bush has through his chamchas, chelas, and gurujons, he might just be able to sneak out of it, though.
A few things. 1. This bill is already dead. If a new bill similar to this ever comes up it will be phrased and planned differently. 2. Anybody who follow politics knew US was going to Iraq regardless of the facts. 3. Bush is a puppet "Manchurian Candidate" who he has taken care of the real powerful people of this country. He doesn't need chamchas. Chamchas change colors. He got the real power behind him.
__________________
Ashraful is like the Eids. Lots of fun twice a year.
Reply With Quote