Quote:
Originally posted by Arnab
Quote:
Originally posted by Zunaid
It becomes inappropriate for a simple reason - the site contains ads to adult oriented and pornographic material. BC caters to fans of all ages and we do not need to be a facilitator here.
|
Does that mean by publishing an article on the site, the Daily Star is facilitating viewing those ads? After all, DS reaches millions of readers more than BC. Is a member linking to the Daily Star article that implicitly links to the dating site also facilitatory in such sense? How is it different from someone directly referring to the same dating site? Or is three degrees of seperation enough for being ethically "clean" and "appropriate"? IMO, the proper label for this ultapalta "simple" reasoning is "weird". But hey, who am I to say anything?
|
Simple - hyperlinked degree of separation - one link away. Sometimes simple is weird - I am simple minded that way
A consequence of a surfeit of grey cells.