View Single Post
  #2984  
Old October 14, 2010, 07:09 AM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 13,532

Just one little thought. It should've been Shafiul-Shakib-Rubel. Not Rubel Shakib Shafiul. Rubel was bowling good at that time. So instead of bowling his last over on the 47th, Shak should've saved him for last.

But who cares. We won. Shafiul did great. + 1 deadly catch.
Reply With Quote