[Tigers_eye]

Analyzing the Babu bhai's data:

Ash: Scored above 30, out of total 34 innings = 9 innings (26.4%) (Poor)
Single digit scoring = 16 innings (47%)(unexceptable)
5 and below = 13 innings (38.2%) (very Poor)
Zero = 5 innings (14.7%)(pathetic)
Total centuries = 2 (5.8%)
Total fifties = 4 (11.7%)(disgraceful for internation stats as the main batsmen for the country)

Shariar Nafees: Scored above 30, out of total 29 innings = 11 innings (37.9%)
Single digit scoring = 8 innings (27%)
5 and below = 6 innings (20.6%)
Zero = 4 innings (13.79%)
Total centuries = 1 (3.4%)
Total fifties = 7 (24.1%)

H Bashar: Scored above 30, out of total 33 innings = 14 innings 42.42%)
Single digit scoring = 8 innings (24.2%)
5 and below = 5 innings (15.15%)
Zero = 2 innings (6%)
Total centuries = 0 (0%)
Total fifties = 8 (24.2%)

The evaluation is not for one or two match but for the entire year. Ash wasn't the only contributor in the win against Australia. With a whooping 47% single digit scoring he should never even be considered as a candidate to win the best batsmen award. If he gets any kind of "ushkani" from the board he will never try to fix his game and the nomination would only encourage him to do what he is doing now.

Bashar is more consistant than S. Nafees. As a senior member he should get the "Best Batsmen award". S. Nafees still need to curve his single digit scoring down in the years to come. Certainly he would win the "Emerging player award".