View Single Post
  #12  
Old September 17, 2011, 10:56 PM
AhmedN AhmedN is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 26, 2011
Posts: 310

Quote:
Originally Posted by FagunerAgun
The continuum of balance of power may tilt faster than expected to a region instead of a country at least for now making US weak in global dominance militarily and economically but still US will lead the world in détente, technology, finance, research and entertainment because of her huge GDP, infrastructures, charisma, and millions of millionaires.

US may go back to a short to midterm military and political hibernation to clean up and restore her own home and then bounce back to where she was supposed to be. The successful come back may happen or not depends on US policy makers’ intention, determination and revamped economic aspiration and their strategic planning and implementation efficiency with positive and constructive support from some special groups and congressmen in US.

But this type of hibernation by a superpower may pose a risk to her entity because it creates a vacuum in the globe which opens up space may be filled by other fast emerging countries or a region. Example: After the Second World War, British Empire went to hibernation, her open space was occupied by US and Russia; and UK never came back to her old strategic position.

However, surely, the total collapse of US civilization will take much longer time than other civilizations did because of her very seasoned and vicious imperialist policy, still high level of tolerance of the US economy, collective economic and political conscience of US common people, solid political institutions and longer than expected politically precarious and economically turbulent situation of Europe, Japan and Russia and the lack of political foresightedness and economic stability of the fastest emerging countries like China, India and Brazil.

Excellent post laal fagun bhai..is it your own write up?
if yes then I have another question for you, hope you do not mind..are you a student of International Relations?
Reply With Quote