Quote:
Originally Posted by Roey Haque
Isn't Garfield supposed to be like miles ahead of the rest of them? That's the impression I get talking to cricket heads.
|
some people think he wasn't that great of a bowler since his average was 34, strike rate was 91, didn't have any good bowlers in his team to compete for wickets thus should have had a better record etc. some think he is miles ahead, while others think he's a lot closer to the others or that some others are even ahead of him.