Who doesn't lie in promoting themselves or their product? That doesn't mean he should be humiliated. If you think you don't like him, don't watch his movies. Dipjol type guys have worse attitude problems, but the industry or media didn't have problem with him of this scale. It's a clear case of Mafia ism, that someone else is doing something better and those old monks of the industry are threatened to lose their business....
What's his attitude problem?
1. That he claims to have audience from English medium?
2. That he claims to have been following/competing withHollywood stars and not Bollywood?
3. That he claims to be educated while you can find his weaknesses in education? .....
Are these problems?? I really don't understand what's the problem here! Can you explain please what's the attitude problem for which he should be humiliated in media ?
Don't you people see his contribution for this dead industry, even with his limited capacity? I like the fact that he is spending money for the industry, he is attracting new audience, he is been creative in casting, editing, preproduction jobs and action elements, he is talking about a change in the industry and he himself is doing something different with his movies, his guts of talking of following or competing with Hollywood, than Bollywood.
The best media could do is, pick up his movies and criticize what he is doing wrong and conduct survey or opinion polls to prove that he couldn't attract the educated class yet etc many other things, than to call him in the name of interview and behave like adalat... With silly issues to humiliate a person.
|