Before some people start trashing a young player like Ryiad, they need a reality check and see how his contribution stands against our so called elite players.
For last two years (in ODI)
1. Ryiad's average: 28.41
2. Tamim's average: 32.09 ( ~3.6 Runs more than Ryiad)
3. Sakib's average: 31.19 ( ~2.8 Runs more than Ryiad)
4. Rokibul's average: 29.59 ( ~1.2 Runs more than Ryiad)
5. Ashraful's average: 29 ( ~ 0.6 Runs more than Ryiad)
How much difference do you see between his average and the elites to say Ryiad is no good?
If Ryiad is no good, then none of the elite are that good either. Atleast for Ryiad's case ( and Rokibul's case) there is hope that he will get batter as he is a relatively new player.
Check the following link for details (Murad's thread):
http://www.banglacricket.com/alochon...ad.php?t=31223