We are jumping our guns too soon. It may look like that a show-cause order is a bad thing, but it may turn out to be for good ONLY if Rafique can produce some evidence to back up what he said. But I don't think Rafique has any evidence to back up his accusation, he got emotional and said the obvious without any proof. Now, selectors are doing this to save their arse from Rafique's accusation. If this was not sent by selectors but by BCB, then I believe they want to do some sort of investigation.
Quote:
An order to show cause is a type of court order that requires one or more of the parties to a case to justify, explain, or prove something to the court. [1] Courts commonly use orders to show cause when the judge needs more information before deciding whether or not to issue an order requested by one of the parties. [2] For example, if a party requests that the court find another party in contempt of an existing court order, the judge will typically issue an "Order to Show Cause Re Contempt" to the party accused of being in contempt of court. At the hearing on the order to show cause concerning contempt the judge will take evidence from both sides concerning the alleged failure to comply with the court order. Appellate courts often issue orders to show cause to lower courts requesting that the lower court explain why the appellant should not be granted the relief requested by the writ or appeal. An order to show cause is always an interim order because it is never the first nor the final action in a legal action.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_to_show_cause
|