Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Roey Haque
1) Source please.
2)Doesn't the foot have to be on the line, and not behind the line? And anyway, there were other decisions that went against us such as the LBWs.
You are right about 3 and 4, but I don't think many people were complaining about that to begin with.
Don't apologize for the commentary, I loved it personally. Biased but fresh and un-scripted like no other.
On a final note, I really came in here looking to see you lamenting the fact how most people haven't given credit to the Zim players( including me), and rather went on a spree of self bashing( be in merited or unmerited). I thought that would offend you the most.
|
I can talk in general terms that that is not the case. "The line belongs to the umpire", meaning a portion of the feet (shoe) has to be behind the line, even the tiniest bit will do, but on the line or covering the line is not good enough.