Look... Inzamam's century:win ratio is 76% compared to Tendulkar's 32%. And Inzamam doesn't have the support from the likes of Sehwag, Laxman, Ganguly and Dravid. I agree though, this isn't a really good way of judging who is a match winner, but if you can come up with a better way, please share it with us.
And seriously... when's the last time Tendulkar has won a match for India?
Edited on, April 16, 2005, 9:01 PM GMT, by Ameer.
|