Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rinathq
Um no, he played a much better domestics season. U can't say Ash is better than him by any means. Maybe Alok doesn't have a great record but I don't remember Alok getting himself stumped in test cricket like Ash. Tells u how far off Ash is where long format is concerned.
Plus Alok never had the chances Ash did......
Anyways I don't want Alok or Ash in test. None of them are test materials. Although I would rather have Alok than Ash any day.
Posted via BC Mobile Edition (iPhone)
|
Why are you arguing with Alok and Ash. Both have records in tes cricket! Ash is the youngest Test centurian!! So if he gets chance after ten years he can make a triple century!!!
And Alok, he is our "Sobe Dhon Nilmony" Test hatrickman!!! If he get chance again after eight years, he can take four wickets ia four consecutive balls!!!! Sorry for Alok. No chance for record breaking!