Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zunaid
Because we can and we do have a moral obligation to protect the weak and the oppressed. But what we do has to be seen to be fair and just and unequivocal.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Equinox
Interesting that you bring up 1971. Where was the American moral obligation towards the weak and the oppressed then?
|
I think you did not get him. In 1971, West Pakistan was weaker than East Pakistan and America rightfully played their moral obligation towards the weak team.
Lets consider few points:
- The population of West Pakistan was 55 Million and East Pakistan was 75 Million. The majority of the population (55 %) lived in East Pakistan.
- West Pakistanis were afraid that East Pakistanis would take over them if they declare 'Bangla' as a state language.
- During 1960s, 70% of total export earnings was originated from East Pakistan, mainly exporting Jute and Tea.
- In 1970s election, AL got absolute majority by winning 297 seats out of 300 seats.
So, now you decide who was the weak and poor party in 1971 ? 
Anyway, back to topic:
I personally don't support America's plan to attack Syria. For me, their main intention is to attack Iran. Syria is just an excuse, nothing else !