Quote:
|
Originally Posted by akabir77
coach we had these kind of players who would play superve for one or more season and then when they get chance will not do anything. I support what jamie said. we needed to pick 15 and stick with them while others grow around them. look at our history we have given players test cap in 10 years then any other country and how many have last. we just can't pick and try depending on 1/2 years of form. this guy is young 19/20 let him play for another 5 and then bring him to the ntl team. instead we change players like we change our shirts. the 15 jemie said was the best when they got picked so we had to make the best. we tried the other way and it just doesn't work in our culture. In our country if players become famous (that means getting into the ntl team not even scoring) they think they have done it and start lacking.
|
So, it is assured/assumed that those outside the national team will play superbly only for one or two seasons and therefore, they should not be considered for national selection; but those in the national team will continue performing and/or their non performance must be tolerated for 4 or 8 years. And then the blame goes to our 'culture', because once a player becomes famous, he starts lacking in his sports-related matter because of being ill-cultured. (And even though, he starts lacking, we must persist with him for 4 to 8 years and again at the end of that period culture will rescue us taking all the blames on its shoulder). Sounds a bit strange, doesn't it?