View Single Post
  #9  
Old January 21, 2010, 10:55 AM
PoorFan PoorFan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Location: Tokyo <---> Dhaka
Posts: 14,850

What a great analysis, yet people got busy posting in useless threads like '20 wicket' and 'School Boy'. Bunch of kids are crying out there for nothing.

Quote:
I say, let these guys play their strength, let them play their cricket. By doing so, we might get more than 118 from our middle order. Play positive, have fun and don't get stifled.
Sounds good for instant, but what if that 'Let-play-their-cricket' disease spreads deep down to 12th 15th man? It wont even take months to lose what we finally acheved in Tamim, Rakib, Riyad, Muhsi, Sakib, Nayeem, Ash [to some extent] etc., after working hard for couple of years. Will it work if coach decide A, B, C should play natural game, and rest must do the labor work? We could be back to square in no time I guess.

Its a good policy for a good matured team like India or Srilanka etc, not good for a team like us, those who have lack in basic technique, shot selection, unable to build partnership, mentally weak etc. First we have to learn those basics, which will lead to be consistent, and once will get matured. And then perhaps such policy will help the team to become more competitive, by then players will be able to adopt and execute the way as situation demand.

Last edited by PoorFan; January 21, 2010 at 11:03 AM..
Reply With Quote