Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sadi
What kinda criteria is 90 balls per test? Thats really stupid... I mean what if there is a great bowler who takes 5/20 in 7 overs in each innings... he won't be mentioned just because he bowled less than 90 balls?
|
"90 balls per innings" criteria needed to ensure Panesar's place in the list.
Look at the wicket criteria...not 35, not 40, not 50.....exactly 30-- becasue Panesar has 31 wickets.
This list was NOT made to statistically find the best spinners. Rather it was tailored to statistically find Panesar.