I understand, the reason I think it is a redundancy is there was nothing new in the starting post, everything mentioned was already discussed and still it is active in some other very good dynamic threads. Those discussions that you are trying to initiate are vastly analysed in those two threads as well.
Another problem is the thread title and its lack of linkage to the original discussion. No one in the cricket world as far as I know of has pointed a finger to BD for ODI's demise. I was curious to learn how those two were related and ended up reading some vain exposure of weak repeatitive jargon.
In case if the thread was just to discuss it could easily be posted in the existings, if it was to alert us about BD's involvement in ODI's demise it better had legitimate source and new found information within.
__________________
À vaincre sans péril, on triomphe sans gloire.
|