View Single Post
  #14  
Old February 11, 2005, 05:15 PM
Sorry's Avatar
Sorry Sorry is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Bradford, England
Posts: 1,228

Quote:
Originally posted by Rubayed
I somewhat agree with your test ranking apart from putting BD b4 Zim might be a little too soon. But i completely disagree with your ODI ranking caz we dont even know how has it been done, beside in 2004 Pakistan did better than India, infact Newzealand also did better than India. And in what basis u put kenya after BD or Zim caz i dont think they even played any ODIs last year,did they?
i have put bd before zims on the basis of recent performance which we both won ODI and test series. if you want to argue saying they are not the strongest team you can do so but i strongly believe if zims play their strong team we would still compete 50-50. kenyia has not played much cricket and in the mean time bd progressed so i had to put bd and zims before kenya. anyway this is my opinion and you have every right to disagree.
so how would you rank?
Reply With Quote