Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fazal
You don't have to convince me Sakib's performance, his stat tells the story. He was #1 all rounder for reasons. That is the reason we expect from him more than other players... he has the talent to provide more to the team.... but sometimes he doesn't show that intend.
I aks you a simple question. How many MOM does he has? How many games we won with him and without him (percentage wise)? You will see, how that validate that "nobody is irreplaceable". Player need to be replace for performance, retirement or due to injury. Over time good teams replaced super star players (age/injury/performance).... this is part of the live of a test playing nation. If we are not capable to do so, then we shouldn't be playing at this level in the first place... period.
|
How many times can one man win matches alone, stats showed new contributes more than 40% to the team
Only one man has done that before him and that's hadlee
And guess what even then we can't win because others never stepped up, only in the past few games has this changed
Put Messi in Sunderland and see if he can get them in champions league, does that mean his contribution would be non existent?
Test matches cannot be won by one man against Good teams
So your idea of we don't win with him so we can drop him is just idiotic, if we simplify it into a scale
You need to be 7/10 to win,
With Shakib we are at like a 6, without him we'll drop to a 3, does the outcome of either result in wins.. No