Younger players have started playing Twenty 20 cricket now a days.
This has to change. Nobody should be allowed to play Twenty 20 cricket until somebody's above 25 years of age. The reason is obvious - we're failing in 50 overs and 20 overs cricket - so what's the point in introducing 20 overs cricket to youngsters?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WarWolf
Another big failure for all the previous and current boards is not being able to put up a good school cricket. We all know about Sachin. He first came to limelight with his 664 partnership record vinod kambli in school cricket. These guys got the opportunity to play longer version of cricket since their childhood. This is how the temperament builds up for them.
On Contrary, our school level players normally play picnic type cricket in limited over championship. I am not sure what the length of the matches in school level these days is. But I am sure it's not more than 40 overs. How can we expect that they would master the art of playing long innings? No Harry Potter is there for them to cast magic I think. Is there any?
|