facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #126  
Old February 2, 2010, 10:58 PM
Catskills Catskills is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438

Quote:
Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Oh sorry Catskills mama for confusing you with Sandy mama! You are still my dear mama!

Sandy mama(Sandpiper) got banned a year or so ago!
No Problem Thank you for kind word.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old February 2, 2010, 11:29 PM
taklima_naj taklima_naj is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 7, 2006
Location: Uk
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 1,703

Quote:
Originally Posted by zainab
Rocky is JS's favourite. he will never drop him, you guys should know that by now, even JS knows that Rocky is not a 20/20 player. Kapali would have done better than him, at least, he can bat, bowl and field, take catches, whereas Rocky drops simple catches.
sad but why, it seems we r losing before playing, one batsman or bowler can make a difference,but still they r picking Rock. we have already seen in 20 20 world cup, what he has done.................................how funny our management.

why do we need Rock to steady up when we have Ash, Mushy Sakib, riyadh who can slog and steadying up the innings, when every ball is important in 20 20. We can instead use a spin bowler, Alok or Razzak (as we know opposition is not good playing spin) who can hit a six, make a contribution with bat as well.

how funny Siddions and Management, they always lack ghilu
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old February 2, 2010, 11:33 PM
cricadda cricadda is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 2,722

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
Bangladesh name team for T20 against New Zealand

The Bangladesh team for the T20 International against New Zealand at Seddon Park, Hamilton tomorrow (Wednesday, 03 February):

1. Tamim Iqbal
2. Mohammad Ashraful
3. Aftab Ahmed
4. Shakib Al Hasan (captain)
5. Roqibul Hassan
6. Mahmudullah
7. Naeem Islam
8. Mushfiqur Rahim (vice captain/wk)
9. Shahadat Hossain
10. Shafiul Islam
11. Nazmul Hossain

12th Man: Imrul Kayes

Note: The match starts at 12pm Bangladesh Standard Time (+6 GMT) and will be LIVE on Sky Sports



Media & Communications Department
i like this squad 90%....not because of 100%.....why shahadat? and why not rubel in this squad?
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old February 2, 2010, 11:35 PM
cricadda cricadda is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 2,722

Quote:
Originally Posted by dolcevita
Tamim , shakib and naeem will do the job

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (iPhone)
dont forget about ash....
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old February 2, 2010, 11:36 PM
beshideshi's Avatar
beshideshi beshideshi is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Ashraful,mashrafe,shakib
Posts: 3,847

The exclusion of Razzak is more than justified, he looked like a 2nd division bowler in the tri nation, with bowling half trackers twice an over. He looked worse than Nayeem with the ball.
Plus, Rajib/Shafiul both have performed tremendously well in the last series, and have earned the spot. 3 pacers in NZ, makes perfect sense
__________________
GODISNOWHERE now read it again.
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old February 2, 2010, 11:38 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,455

Quote:
Originally Posted by beshideshi
The exclusion of Razzak is more than justified, he looked like a 2nd division bowler in the tri nation, with bowling half trackers twice an over. He looked worse than Nayeem with the ball.
Plus, Rajib/Shafiul both have performed tremendously well in the last series, and have earned the spot. 3 pacers in NZ, makes perfect sense
Bingo !!
__________________
Stop that “chudurbudur”
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old February 2, 2010, 11:57 PM
jisaan's Avatar
jisaan jisaan is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Location: Nijhum Dwip
Favorite Player: Nasir/Taskin/Anamul/Sohag
Posts: 4,743
Default 100 wickets, possible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HereWeGo
What is it about Raqibul that Jamie Siddons love so much??
I mean Rock for T20 ? really? I mean Really????

BTW Saqlain Sajib got another 6fer yesterday....how long will he be ignored?
Off the topic though, should he play all the matches in NCL, he might end up with 100 wickets in NCL this season.

With Razzak a proven failure in Tests, and Enamul failing to deliver, he stands a GOOD CHANCE to test the technique of the english!
__________________
Bangladesh's Win (agt any team) = 100% Joy
India's Loss (agt any team) = 100% Joy
So, only opportunity for me to double my joy is when Bangladesh BEATs India!!!
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:09 AM
cricket_king's Avatar
cricket_king cricket_king is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 10, 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,254

Rakibul Hasan?

....

ARE THEY INSANE?
__________________
Learn from yesterday, live for today and hope for tomorrow

- Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:25 AM
Catskills Catskills is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438

Quote:
Originally Posted by beshideshi
The exclusion of Razzak is more than justified, he looked like a 2nd division bowler in the tri nation, with bowling half trackers twice an over. He looked worse than Nayeem with the ball.
Plus, Rajib/Shafiul both have performed tremendously well in the last series, and have earned the spot. 3 pacers in NZ, makes perfect sense
I totally agree with you. But If that is the case then how come they didn't select other spinner like Shuvo to replace Razzak? We have strength in spin bowling, shouldn't we use it? Be it Razzaq or Shuvo or someone else. Remember in T20/ODI when our pacers get hamered, it is our spinners who slow down the run rate.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:34 AM
Catskills Catskills is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438

By the way, Saqlain Sajib is having a time of his life in NCL. Perhaps our BD Mendis or BD Saqlain Mustaq, spinning with dosra and tesra in every match. Kicking everyone's pants off.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:39 AM
Nocturnal's Avatar
Nocturnal Nocturnal is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: AB,Canada
Favorite Player: Nasir / Mominul / Gazi
Posts: 8,974

Quote:
Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Oh sorry Catskills mama for confusing you with Sandy mama! You are still my dear mama!

Sandy mama(Sandpiper) got banned a year or so ago!
RIP Sandy man!! miss him too
__________________
ভাই, ল্যাঞ্জা যখন বাইর হইয়াই গেছে, একটু নাড়ান না
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old February 3, 2010, 01:51 AM
hbk619 hbk619 is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 7, 2010
Posts: 527

yes people welcome to the reality.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old February 3, 2010, 01:57 AM
Naimul_Hd's Avatar
Naimul_Hd Naimul_Hd is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Location: Global City of Australia
Favorite Player: Shakib, Mashrafe
Posts: 13,278

where is everybody ?? still watching the game.....huh ! :@
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old February 3, 2010, 02:11 AM
Zeeshan's Avatar
Zeeshan Zeeshan is offline
BC Staff
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: March 9, 2008
Location: Ω
Posts: 24,932

Take that Roq haters!!!! Highest score PLUS a sixer.

Holler!
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old February 3, 2010, 02:23 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,455

I hope all those fan's pan-pani about Rokibul will stop ....

Yes Rakibul may not suite for your ideal T20 team, but our team is nowhere near ideal.

When Dashing Tamim scored 14 runs with SR 155
When "Talent-e Tosh toshe" Motin scored 11 runs with SR 78
When Dashing Aftab scored 12 runs with SR 85
When Super Duper Sakib scored 2 runs with SR 60
When steady rahim scored a duck with SR 0
When solid Riyad scored 11 runs with SR 47
When chokka Naeem scored 5 runs with SR 45

The ugly duckling Rokibul scored 18 runs with SR 138

So if you need to do further pan-panani, then I suggest do that for the right reason that our super talented dashing top order. When your top 7 batsman fails, it doesn't matter whether its Rokibul, Kobirul or Korimul is playing at #8 slot.

How come the supposedly most slowpoke player scored the most run with second best SR in the team?

So may be its not the coach but some of the fans know less only that they don't realize that.....
__________________
Stop that “chudurbudur”
Reply With Quote
  #141  
Old February 3, 2010, 03:25 AM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 3,873

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
How come the supposedly most slowpoke player scored the most run with second best SR in the team?
.....
Thats because the game was already over by then. Even Rafiq could have done better than that. Even Ziaur could have done better. #8 is reserved for an alrounder. He in no alrounder and no T20 batsman. Only the dumb selectors like ours will selelct him, any other team, including Nigeria would discard him for T20.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old February 3, 2010, 03:26 AM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 3,873

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeshanM
Take that Roq haters!!!! Highest score PLUS a sixer.

Holler!
One day you will learn T20, and I hope this pathetic team learns it with you.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old February 3, 2010, 07:23 AM
BRady BRady is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: January 26, 2010
Posts: 88

Mark my words Rock is NOT a match winner and wont be.... he got high score cos he stayed in crease longer and still was crap
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old February 3, 2010, 10:20 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,455

With your "could have ... should have" scenario, ofcourse anything isn possible...even someone could claim Junaid would have scored a century...however these kind of scenario is based on speculation not fact as in reality they didn't played in that game and therefore one can claim equally that Rafiq/Ziaul would have scored a duck with SR 0 and he will be equally correct as you are with your claim.
Even for the sake of argument, if we assume you are right, still that means Rafiq/Ziaul would also score more than our top 7 batsman in the team in that game. Therefore even in your scenario, Rakibul wan not the problem in that game.... our front 7 batsman were. That's where we lost the game. A Juniad/Imrul/Alok woudn;t save us that game.

When our top order (who ever then end up with) start perfroming consistenly, at that point there will be no need for a player like rakibul may be.... but now complaining the inclusion of rakibul is pointless. To me complaining about a player who just scored 18 runs with SR 155, is not where our complain should be .... our complain should be our fragile top order filled with so called dashing batsman who fails more often than not.

And thanks but no thanks... for now I would rather stick with "Stupid selectors and coach"... they are not perfect.... but I have no problem sticking with Rakibul for now a little longer before figuring out our main issue ..... our fragile and paper tiger top order in T20.
__________________
Stop that “chudurbudur”
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old February 3, 2010, 11:59 AM
Peace Peace is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: February 3, 2009
Posts: 696

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siraji
Thanks for clarifying. I'm not gonna tell you're wrong.I respect your intelligence and I expect you to find that out yourself.
I found it out today.
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:08 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,455

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peace
I found it out today.
What a reversal ....Looks like now it's Siraji's intelligence at stake now.

I still respect Siraji's intelligence though.
__________________
Stop that “chudurbudur”
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:12 PM
SS SS is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 24, 2004
Posts: 8,975

Announcement koira joto na shomoi niche ...our innings lasted less than that...kamer theika preparation beshi
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:18 PM
Peace Peace is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: February 3, 2009
Posts: 696

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
What a reversal ....Looks like now it's Siraji's intelligence at stake now.

I still respect Siraji's intelligence though.
I have no doubt about Siraji's intelligence.
It was just a fluke, and Roq’s contribution counted for nothing because it did not win us the match.
Remember intelligence is permanent (class), and the form is temporary.
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:34 PM
wiseshah wiseshah is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: newyork
Favorite Player: Ryder,Tamim,shakib,warner
Posts: 6,135

i want next time this team

javed omar
mehrab jr
faruk ahmed (selector and captain)
khaled masud
rajin saleh
rokibul hasan
shahadat
rubel
enamul haq moni
santo
monju

in our 20/20 team, plz dont exclude one single person
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket