Ants defeat atheism

[bujhee kom]

Vs.

[Electrequiem]

Originally Posted by Purbasha T
Disappointed with the cherry-picking you've done there. I let it pass.

I'm disappointed that you've let it pass, lol. I mean, these are valid questions. These are what almost all theists who subscribe to the Abrahamic God believe.

But do we agree that choosing between an ever-living God (not particular to any religion) and a non-living particle/gas/vaccum is not an issue that can be determined by logic, as both sides have their share of points? One just has to go with their conscience here.

You mean cannot be determined YET. We inch closer everyday.

Besides, who says there needs to be a choice between these two? Who's to say they are not the same thing?

[Purbasha T]

Originally Posted by Electrequiem
...
You mean cannot be determined YET. We inch closer everyday.

Besides, who says there needs to be a choice between these two? Who's to say they are not the same thing?

So you're open to the possibility of this issue being determined in favour of the thiests as well? Nice to know. Ignore if that wasn't your implication.

But no, I didn't forget to write ''yet'' in there. Can you think of a scenario that would be decisive enough to disprove all the thiestic claims entirely?