facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old December 10, 2012, 05:50 PM
Crisis Crisis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Posts: 1,096

29 runs ... wak thooo
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old December 10, 2012, 07:56 PM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 685

Rubel bowled one of the best deliveries in Bangladesh Cricket yesterday. The ball that got Dwane Smith out bowled was one of the best balls delivered in the history of our game. However, he was unlucky, unlucky that he did not get to continue bowling when the condition was so good for bowling pace. He was unlucky that Samuels after being given 3 lives was in that devastating mood and would have destroyed any bowler that came in his way.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old December 10, 2012, 08:13 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Location: Home of the Brave
Posts: 10,645

It was dumb of Rahim to take him out of the attack when they had no answer for him. Should've saved Shaiful and bowled at least one more from Rubel. And knowing how he went for crap load of runs against Samuels he shouldn't have made that mistake.
__________________
@dilcommissioner
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old December 10, 2012, 08:34 PM
Ajfar's Avatar
Ajfar Ajfar is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Favorite Player: Nirala
Posts: 17,250

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
It was dumb of Rahim to take him out of the attack when they had no answer for him. Should've saved Shaiful and bowled at least one more from Rubel. And knowing how he went for crap load of runs against Samuels he shouldn't have made that mistake.
It wouldn't have mattered. Samuels should have never lasted that long to begin with. No matter who bowled the last couple overs Samuels would have still went on with his attack. We lost our chance to get Samuels, and he made us pay. I think from a captains perspective saving Rubel for the end wasn't a bad idea, because he did pick up 2 wickets. And you want the save the bowler who is on song for the end of the innings.

I think had Zia or Shafi bowled the last overs they still would have gone for runs, and we'd be here going Mushy was stupid not to save Rubel for the end because he is the one who picked up wickets.
__________________
"I was the happiest man in the world, happier than Bill Gates"- Tamim Iqbal
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old December 11, 2012, 06:39 AM
Tiger Manc's Avatar
Tiger Manc Tiger Manc is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: November 2, 2009
Favorite Player: Suhrawadi Shuvo
Posts: 4,446

That was a gem of a delivery to Smith. Really enjoyed that delivery.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old March 23, 2013, 11:35 AM
WarWolf WarWolf is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Favorite Player: Love them all....
Posts: 11,404

Rubel should be dropped from the team forever! Enough!!!
__________________
And Allah Knows the best
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old September 15, 2013, 02:13 AM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 685

This guy is in the form of his life!

6 wickets followed by a 5 wicket haul!

__________________
Taskin Ahmed Tazim - The future
Edited: The future is here. The next big thing for Bangladeshi Cricket.
143 KPH - 18 years - Against Aussies - 1st April, 2014
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old September 15, 2013, 02:21 AM
MHRAM MHRAM is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 30, 2013
Favorite Player: Tendo, Shakib, Gilchrist
Posts: 2,192

Rest In Piece-New Zealand Batsmen
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old September 15, 2013, 03:01 AM
Night_wolf's Avatar
Night_wolf Night_wolf is offline
BC Staff
BC Bangladesh
 
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: City of Traffic Jam
Favorite Player: Gilly
Posts: 12,494

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanvir_nus
This guy is in the form of his life!

6 wickets followed by a 5 wicket haul!
2ta match e bhalo khellei keu form of the life e thakenare bhai, Eng tour ato taratari bhule gele cholbe?, 5ta match consistently khelte den na
__________________
Associates whom Bangladesh has lost to: 1.Kenya 2.Canada 3.Ireland 4.Netherlands 5. Scotland 6. Afganistan 7. Hongkong
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old September 15, 2013, 03:42 AM
BD_TigerZ's Avatar
BD_TigerZ BD_TigerZ is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: July 26, 2012
Location: Arkham Asylum
Favorite Player: Mushfiqur and ABD
Posts: 4,034

Picnic league e 3rd division player re out koira "form of his life hoya gese" When he needed to wgt wickets in Eng he didnt..As all our pacers suck there is no choice but picking him..
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old September 15, 2013, 07:10 AM
MohammedC MohammedC is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
 
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Location: Manchester,UK
Favorite Player: bhujee kom
Posts: 22,424

Quote:
Originally Posted by BD_TigerZ
Picnic league e 3rd division player re out koira "form of his life hoya gese" When he needed to wgt wickets in Eng he didnt..As all our pacers suck there is no choice but picking him..
Angelo MAthews

Azhar Mahmood

Mehrab (Mati the kamor dea thaka batsmen) Hussain

Sohrawardi Shubo (Ok he is be low avg)

Ahsan is tailender.


Third division??? I agree they are not Tendulkaresq but first 2 are definitely better than Kiwis except odd few on form.
__________________
I love Bangladesh cricket and that's why I found BanglaCricket.com
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old September 15, 2013, 07:30 AM
simon's Avatar
simon simon is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 20, 2008
Favorite Player: Tam,Sak,Nasa,Mash
Posts: 19,208

I was against his inclusion to the national team for NZ series but the way he is performing now is making me more and more convinced, but I want him to have two more good matches, by that I mean two more 3fer atleast, if he does that I will be happy to see him against NZ.
__________________
Tea20 is just not our cup of tea.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old September 15, 2013, 08:14 AM
Saifulsohel Saifulsohel is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: October 21, 2011
Location: Dhaka,Bd
Favorite Player: Shakib,Tamim,Anamul
Posts: 1,181

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarWolf
Rubel should be dropped from the team forever! Enough!!!
lolz!!!!
__________________
A cricket-lover engineer
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old September 15, 2013, 08:38 AM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 7,795

Rubel will most likely be in now for the NZ series. Good to see that he followed up his 6fer with a 5fer. He's going to have to make it count when he gets his chances
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old September 15, 2013, 09:17 AM
MHRAM MHRAM is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 30, 2013
Favorite Player: Tendo, Shakib, Gilchrist
Posts: 2,192

In the meanwhile. Shahadat keeps on failing which just shows what a horrible player he really is.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old September 15, 2013, 09:38 AM
rinathq's Avatar
rinathq rinathq is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 1, 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Favorite Player: Mash, Shak, Enam, Riyad
Posts: 2,735

ODI performance should not be the deciding factor for the selection of the test squad. For ODI, we have Mashrafe and Zia(most likely). Against Kiwis thats more seamers than enough seamers. For test, we have Robiul and therefore need a second seamer. Yes Rubel has the edge there but I feel like Al Amin has performed better than Rubel at the English conditions so he is not far behind either. In fact, Al Amin will probably get selected as the 3rd seamer for the test squad
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old September 15, 2013, 11:06 AM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 8,012

he's a better one-day bowler than he is a long format bowler, these performances are great, but he still needs to perform at the international level otherwise he's just a nazimuddin. anyway if anything DPL results should be a measuring point for ODI selection, so if he is to get national selection then it should be in the one-day format.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Pollock 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Procter 9 Miller 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old September 15, 2013, 02:51 PM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 7,795

I agree with you guys that it is a 50 over format and we should consider this for ODIs. Selector Akram Khan said however that the DPL performances will be a factor in the Test selections. So they will make a difference whether we agree with it or not.

We have to also to consider this as well. Last time we played the longer version was in April against Zimbabwe and the BCL final. Majority of those FC matches were played last year. It's very hard to pick performers from last year since that was a long time ago. We have to judge the current form of our players as well. Not an ideal situation, I know but that's the way it has to be. Since Rubel has been our best pacer so far and with 2 5+ wk hauls, he has to be looking pretty good for a spot in the Test team.

Also, our team management have been taking 4 pacers for Test tours. So most likely, we'll be seeing 4 pacers making the team which again would favor Rubel a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old September 15, 2013, 05:03 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 8,012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger444
I agree with you guys that it is a 50 over format and we should consider this for ODIs. Selector Akram Khan said however that the DPL performances will be a factor in the Test selections. So they will make a difference whether we agree with it or not.

We have to also to consider this as well. Last time we played the longer version was in April against Zimbabwe and the BCL final. Majority of those FC matches were played last year. It's very hard to pick performers from last year since that was a long time ago. We have to judge the current form of our players as well. Not an ideal situation, I know but that's the way it has to be. Since Rubel has been our best pacer so far and with 2 5+ wk hauls, he has to be looking pretty good for a spot in the Test team.

Also, our team management have been taking 4 pacers for Test tours. So most likely, we'll be seeing 4 pacers making the team which again would favor Rubel a bit.
i reckon get a list of players who did well in NCL, BCL last season, overall career and also factor in A team stuff. then watch the form of those players in the DPL and pick from them. they shouldn't just purely pick on DPL form, got to take other stuff into consideration to. rubel has been horrible in tests so for me it's pretty tough to select him for tests from here, good form or not.

for the 4 pacers i think robiul, zia and al amin should be there for tests, the 4th is more difficult with nazmul injured, mash injury prone. so yes favours rubel but i'd pick someone else personally.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Pollock 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Procter 9 Miller 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old September 15, 2013, 06:33 PM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 7,795

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gowza
i reckon get a list of players who did well in NCL, BCL last season, overall career and also factor in A team stuff. then watch the form of those players in the DPL and pick from them. they shouldn't just purely pick on DPL form, got to take other stuff into consideration to. rubel has been horrible in tests so for me it's pretty tough to select him for tests from here, good form or not.

for the 4 pacers i think robiul, zia and al amin should be there for tests, the 4th is more difficult with nazmul injured, mash injury prone. so yes favours rubel but i'd pick someone else personally.
I gathered the top 5 pacers in the NCL and BCL combined. The top 5 were Shahadat, Robiul, Farhad Reza, Sajedul, and Sharif. Robiul obviously belongs in the Test side and Sajedul should be considered. The rest however should not be as they are not Test caliber.

Even though Zia did great in the last Test, I'm still a bit skeptical of putting him in for Tests. He didn't really bowl much in the NCL and BCL, then in the A team he hardly did anything with the ball and now in the DPL he hasn't done anything. My thing with him is can we trust him as a Test bowler? He hasn't bowled enough to really show his body can take 20-30 overs. Yes I know he did it in 1 innings against Zimbabwe. Can he do it on a consistent basis? Lets not forget that he's had serious injury problems throughout his career and if we lose him because of over bowling then it'd be a shame. No doubt he's a good player for the shorter forms but I have my doubts with him for the longer form. Maybe it'd be a better thing if we use him only for the shorter form.

I'd consider Sajidul since he adds variation being a left arm seamer and is a good swing bowler.

So in the end, I think it'll be Robiul, Al-Amin, Rubel, and Zia but wouldn't be surprised if Sajidul makes it ahead of Zia.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old September 15, 2013, 06:48 PM
rinathq's Avatar
rinathq rinathq is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 1, 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Favorite Player: Mash, Shak, Enam, Riyad
Posts: 2,735

It would be foolish to pick 4 seamers for the test series. First of all, we wont even play more than 2 seamrs and Secondly, we are at home, so in case of an injury or sudden decision, another seamer can be drafted in after 1st test.

3 seamers...
Robiul
Zia/ Reza
Sajidul/Rubel
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old September 15, 2013, 07:02 PM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 7,795

We took 4 pacers for the SL/Zim Test series. We took 3 for the WI series but that's because we batted 8 deep that series. I agree though, I'd rather take 3 pacers and 3 spinners rather than 4 pacers and 2 spinners.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old September 15, 2013, 07:41 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 8,012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger444
I gathered the top 5 pacers in the NCL and BCL combined. The top 5 were Shahadat, Robiul, Farhad Reza, Sajedul, and Sharif. Robiul obviously belongs in the Test side and Sajedul should be considered. The rest however should not be as they are not Test caliber.

Even though Zia did great in the last Test, I'm still a bit skeptical of putting him in for Tests. He didn't really bowl much in the NCL and BCL, then in the A team he hardly did anything with the ball and now in the DPL he hasn't done anything. My thing with him is can we trust him as a Test bowler? He hasn't bowled enough to really show his body can take 20-30 overs. Yes I know he did it in 1 innings against Zimbabwe. Can he do it on a consistent basis? Lets not forget that he's had serious injury problems throughout his career and if we lose him because of over bowling then it'd be a shame. No doubt he's a good player for the shorter forms but I have my doubts with him for the longer form. Maybe it'd be a better thing if we use him only for the shorter form.

I'd consider Sajidul since he adds variation being a left arm seamer and is a good swing bowler.

So in the end, I think it'll be Robiul, Al-Amin, Rubel, and Zia but wouldn't be surprised if Sajidul makes it ahead of Zia.
i'm skeptical about zia to but i rather give him more chances than rubel.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Pollock 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Procter 9 Miller 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old September 16, 2013, 12:07 PM
WarWolf WarWolf is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Favorite Player: Love them all....
Posts: 11,404

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saifulsohel
lolz!!!!
Let him prove it in the international circuit.

Unless he improves his international stats, these domestic performances don't mean anything to me.
__________________
And Allah Knows the best
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old September 17, 2013, 04:59 AM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 8,012

rubel has always been bad in the longer format, got a bit better after his return from the shoulder injury but still nowhere near good enough. as far as one-dayers he's always been pretty good, or at least decent, but he has had a poor run in the short format since the shoulder injury (which seems a bit strange since he did better than he had previously done in tests).

his ODI average just dropped from 32 to 34, it's still ok, since he's in good form i can see him being in the ODI team but there's no way he should be anywhere near the test team atm.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Pollock 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Procter 9 Miller 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket