facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old March 6, 2015, 12:14 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 17,325

Yes why stuck with the 8th batsman? Lets bring the 9th batsman in the team.
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
Reply With Quote

  #27  
Old March 6, 2015, 04:57 PM
Mas_UK25's Avatar
Mas_UK25 Mas_UK25 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 15, 2015
Location: London, England, UK
Favorite Player: ATM - No One.
Posts: 4,712

Totally dislike this backward step of having 8batters and less bowlers.

I would go with 4 + Shakib = FIVE. Shakib alone is STAR. 2pacers and another 2 SLA's plus Shakib. Mahmudullah a few overs if needed. M'Ullah is pretty OK handy spinner. But, this isnt a match to try part timers, instead need to choke them with SLA'S. This England batting dont play spin too well. Their top batters are Right handed likes of Bell, Root, Butler down the order. So, I think we should go with another 2 more SLA'S plus Obvious *Shakib* the STAR SPINNER IN our history., No point going with 3pacers with England.

If Mashrafee isnt fit then I'd go with this XI down below.

Tamim
Soumya
Mahmudullah
Mushfiqur
Shakib
Shabbir
Nasir
Rubel
Arafat
Taskin
Taijul

But, if Mash is fit then I'd take Rubel out.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old March 8, 2015, 01:36 PM
simon's Avatar
simon simon is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 20, 2008
Favorite Player: Tam,Sak,Nasa,Mash
Posts: 23,393

Chased down 300+ vs Scot and people asking for 7 batzmn , I can bet my lungi if our batting disappoints tomorrow people will ask for 9 batsman.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old March 8, 2015, 01:46 PM
BANFAN's Avatar
BANFAN BANFAN is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,705

Have all 11 batsman ... why not, select best bowlers from who can bat....we already have 4

Shakib, Mullah, Nasir, Sabbir & Add Mash....why do we need more bowlers? Koto aar marbe ederke? So this way we can have all 11 bats man, then Mash will be number 11 ... Not a bad idea so whatever target they give, we are ready to chase it down

Point to note; we can never bat first ... Because then they will hit on demand LOL
__________________
[Post CWC15 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-1 D-1/B]// ODI: W-3 L-0 // T20: W-1 L-0]

Last edited by BANFAN; March 8, 2015 at 05:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old March 8, 2015, 02:03 PM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 11,009

^^Afsos, we have only 9 batsmen in the squad. Otherwise we could have kick out Mash too! Who needs Mash when Soumya can ball?!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old March 8, 2015, 02:03 PM
BANFAN's Avatar
BANFAN BANFAN is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon
Chased down 300+ vs Scot and people asking for 7 batzmn , I can bet my lungi if our batting disappoints tomorrow people will ask for 9 batsman.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Then if England chase down, they will also ask for 9 bowlers catch 22
__________________
[Post CWC15 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-1 D-1/B]// ODI: W-3 L-0 // T20: W-1 L-0]
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old March 8, 2015, 02:04 PM
BANFAN's Avatar
BANFAN BANFAN is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
^^Afsos, we have only 9 batsmen in the squad. Otherwise we could have kick out Mash too! Who needs Mash when Soumya can ball!
__________________
[Post CWC15 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-1 D-1/B]// ODI: W-3 L-0 // T20: W-1 L-0]
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old March 8, 2015, 02:13 PM
Ace of BD Ace of BD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Favorite Player: The Champion
Posts: 1,404

I am gonna fly down to Adelaide and injure whoever is involved in selecting 8 batsmen for today's game. The most nerve-wracking moment for me is gonna be I guess when I see the playing XI selected.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old March 9, 2015, 12:14 AM
Habib's Avatar
Habib Habib is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 30, 2007
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Favorite Player: A few
Posts: 9,901

Probably having 8 batsmen is the way to go for us. Scoring 300+ against Scotland on a road does not always tell the true story. So however defensive it is we should play 8 batsmen. Move Sarkar to opening and bring in Nasir. May be bring in an SLA in place of Rubel or Taskin if needed.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old March 9, 2015, 12:16 AM
Night_wolf's Avatar
Night_wolf Night_wolf is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Favorite Player: Mash
Posts: 17,146

i think current Eng-BD scorecard was the FETISH with 8 batsman..Scotland trolled us!
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old March 9, 2015, 12:25 AM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 11,009

When you have bolods, who will sacrifice a well conditioned batsman for a guy flown in the country just two days, to manage your team, even 10 batsmen won't be enough.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old March 9, 2015, 12:27 AM
Night_wolf's Avatar
Night_wolf Night_wolf is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Favorite Player: Mash
Posts: 17,146

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
When you have bolods, who will sacrifice a well conditioned batsman for a guy flown in the country just two days, to manage your team, even 10 batsmen won't be enough.
lol true that!..this team management is filled with geniuses
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old March 9, 2015, 12:46 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 3,784

If we played Sarkar at 2, Riyad at 3, Mushfiq at 4, we would have had Shakib, Shabbir and Nasir waiting in the dressing room, preparing to have a go by now.

We dont need 8 batsman, we just need to get the selection and ordering correct! Disappointed with that.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old March 9, 2015, 01:15 AM
betaar's Avatar
betaar betaar is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 24, 2004
Location: Land of the free
Favorite Player: The big hearted ones
Posts: 2,665

We need to decipher who we are calling genuine bowlers in our squad and their quality. It's not like we are playing 8th batsman for a genuine bowler who is a Mitchel Starc or Southee quality, or heck Rahat Ali.
There's not much difference between our genuine pace bowlers and the part timers such as Sabbir and Riyadh. Both these bowlers economy was much better than our genuine bowlers Taskin and Rubel. So why not go with Nasir, instead of Rubel, who could have given us good 30-40 runs and few overs of slow bowling if needed. That change in itself would have made a significant positive impact.
__________________
www.TravelAssistonBoard.com - Your friend in the clouds!!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old March 9, 2015, 01:29 AM
bujhee kom's Avatar
bujhee kom bujhee kom is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: June 27, 2007
Location: Dhaka Mental Hospital
Favorite Player: Mo Chowdhury MoC
Posts: 23,537

Foottooshh...
__________________
God bless Kamala Harris & Mitch Landrieu
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old March 9, 2015, 01:43 AM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 11,009

^^ betaar, you can't win an ODI just by containing, you need to take wickets too. Nasir and Rubel's strike rates are nothing comparable.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old March 9, 2015, 12:22 PM
betaar's Avatar
betaar betaar is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 24, 2004
Location: Land of the free
Favorite Player: The big hearted ones
Posts: 2,665

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
^^ betaar, you can't win an ODI just by containing, you need to take wickets too. Nasir and Rubel's strike rates are nothing comparable.
Eating my humble pie for today's win. It tastes sweet either way.

My analysis is based on the inconsistency in our batters as well as well our pace bowlers, especially Rubel. Today he delivered wonderfully just as he did against NZ at home. But the stat over the last decade overshadows the onsie-twosie performances every now and then.
If the pacers can perform like this more often, then they will add more weight in their selection for a 3 or even 4 prong attack, especially outside Bangladesh. Trust me...nobody would be happier.
__________________
www.TravelAssistonBoard.com - Your friend in the clouds!!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old March 9, 2015, 01:06 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 17,325

Quote:
Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Foottooshh...

yes that fettish is fooottooshh... with some good batting from our middle order we may not see 8 batsman again in this world cup.
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old March 9, 2015, 01:22 PM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,973

Riyad+Sabbir+Naair this is not a bad combination as 5th bowler specially in subcontinental condition. If we take 5 front line bowlers sometimes its a wastage of batting spot specially when our batting is weak in Australian condition.
Overall I follow one theory, in batting wicket play with 7batsman. In bowling wicket play with 8 batsman.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old March 9, 2015, 06:46 PM
Tiger Manc's Avatar
Tiger Manc Tiger Manc is offline
BD-SL Test Fantasy Winner 2017
 
Join Date: November 2, 2009
Favorite Player: Suhrawadi Shuvo
Posts: 4,854

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
When you have bolods, who will sacrifice a well conditioned batsman for a guy flown in the country just two days, to manage your team, even 10 batsmen won't be enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
^^ betaar, you can't win an ODI just by containing, you need to take wickets too. Nasir and Rubel's strike rates are nothing comparable.
Eshen you echo my thoughts. We beat England because we took wickets. You can't just bowl 50 overs of spin and ask your spinners to keep it tight, eventually the batsmen will smash you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket