facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 8, 2005, 12:08 AM
CTazim CTazim is offline
ODI Cricketer
Join Date: January 6, 2005
Posts: 904
Default Is Bangladesh really struggling?

This is in response to S. Rajesh’s Friday column in www.cricinfo.com on June 3. 2005.

In his weekly column in www.cricinfo.com, while addressing Bangladesh’s struggle, S. Rajesh provides a comparison of several parameters between the first 19 tests and the following 16 Tests that Bangladesh has played so far. In his calculations, despite excluding the results from playing a “weak” Zimbabwean team, he points out several areas of progress that Bangladesh had made. I just want to correct Mr. Rajesh in his point of “Bangladesh have reduced the deficit between runs scored per wicket and runs conceded per wicket by ten - that's a 25% improvement”. I think he meant Bangladesh has increased average runs scored between wickets from 18.55 to 21.38 and reduced the average number of runs conceded to an opponent between wickets. However, I calculate those improvements at 15% and 12% respectively. I have also provided the percentages of improvement in other categories below. The most significant improvement is the average number of overs batted by Bangladesh in the 1st innings: an improvement of 28% in sustainability. Another, improvement is a 39% reduction in the number of runs conceded on average in a first innings lead by an opponent. Although the results may not align with our expectations as die hard Bangladeshi supporters and that of the rest of the world, the progress has been steady. Furthermore, there has been no deterioration in any of the categories mentioned below.

Categories............................Improvement Between
____________________ First 19 Tests and
____________________ next 16 tests
____________________(excluding Zm Series)
Runs/ wkt scored..............................15%
Runs/ wkt conceded .......................12%
Ave no. of overs batted.....................28%
in 1st innings
Ave 1st-inn. lead conceded.............39%

Runs/ over scored.............................4%
Runs/ over conceded.......................9%

S. Rajesh then brings the statistics of the first 37 tests played among all test playing nation and points out how dreadful our statistics have been. In trying to prove the gulf of difference between Bangladesh and the rest of the test playing nation, he states “it's easily the worst of all teams” as “their 32 defeats after 37 Tests is by far the poorest - South Africa, with the second-worst record, had only lost 23 at the same stage in their Test career."

However, I think that the tendency to compare test playing nations at the juncture of first 37 tests is flawed. In the similar manner where wins are trivialized as wins against weaker nations (case in point home series win against Zimbabwe). The fact remains that it was an official test match, unless ICC deemed it otherwise. Similar wins against weaker opponents and club teams in guise of a team carrying the national flag (see West Indies section below) or drawn tests when maximum 3 days were alllocated for a test match in the early days of a nation's cricket history are well documented. If we scrutanize the backdrop of the first 37 tests played by the other 9 test playing nations, it will be reasonable to say that the Media and some of the so called pundits have been and are wreckless when it comes to criticizing Bangladesh's Test status and record.

South Africa

South Africa in its first 37 tests only played England and Australia. They first played a test in 1888/89 against England and first drew a test against Australia in 1902, which was a 3 day match. The first time they won a test was in 1905, at Home, against England. Overall, South Africa played the 37 tests between 1888/89 and 1913, a span of 24 years.

England & Australia

England first played Test Cricket in 1876 against Australia and played the first 37 Tests through 1892, a span of 16 years. They invented the game and only played South Africa and Australia during the first 16 years. Australia on the other hand only played England between 1876 and 1893 for her first 37 tests.

West Indies

West Indies played their first 37 tests between 1928 and 1955, in a span of 26 years. Their inaugural 3 tests in England were all 3 day matches and England won all 3 of them by inning differences. Their first win against England was in reality against the Melbourne Cricket Club, although it has been considered a win against England. An analogy will be claiming Bangladesh Under-19 team’s unbeaten record in its recent tour of Australia as that of Bangladesh’s triumph against the mighty Australians.

New Zealand

New Zealand did not have a win in her first 37 tests between 1929 and 1958/59. The matches it drew between 1929 and 1949 were all 3 day matches. The first 4 day match she drew was in 1950/51 against England. New Zealand drew the first 5 day match against India in 1955. In Pakistan, they drew 1 of the 3 tests in 1955 as well. All were 5 day matches. However, there was no play in the first 2 days of the drawn test. Pakistan won by an innings and 1 run in the 1st Test in Karachi.

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka played their 37 Tests between 1981 and 1991 and won 2 tests in 10 years. Their first drawn match was against Pakistan and that too Sri Lanka almost won. It should remind the readers of Bangladesh in Multan, Pakistan, where Bangladesh lost to Pakistan by 1 wicket, God knows what would have happened had Mohammed Rafique not been chivalrous and asked Shabbir Ahmed to return to his crease on a live ball or Umpire Ashoka Di Silva of Sri Lanka did not make some questionable decisions against Bangladesh.


India played her first 37 tests between 1932 and 1952 against England, Australia, West Indies and Pakistan. The first test in England was a 3 day match and India lost by 158 runs. In 1933, India hosted England for 3 tests, all were 4 day matches. In two of the three tests, England won by 9 wickets and by 202 runs respectively. The other 4 day test resulted in a draw after India managed to continue batting in the second innings after forced to follow on. It was not until 1951 that India got her maiden test win against a second string English team in Madras. The other two wins during that time was against rookie Pakistan in 1952. In their maiden visit to Australia, India lost the 5 test series 4-0: Australia won by an innings and 226 runs at Brisbane, 2nd Test at Sidney was drawn because of rain as there was no play on Day 3 & 4, Australia won by 233 runs at Melbourne, Australia won by an innings and 16 runs at Adelaide and Australia won by an innings and 177 runs
at Melbourne. India also lost a 4 day match to Western Australia at Perth: Western Australia won by 6 runs.


Pakistan had a very impressive entry into Test cricket as they beat India in her inaugural test series in 1952. However, further scrutiny will reveal that majority of the players in the early years of Pakistani national team played in India’s domestic cricket prior to the partition of the subcontinent in 1947. All the players were either from Lahore, Punjab or Amritsar, Punjab Pakistan with the exception of Hanif Mohammad. He was originally from Gujrat, India and migrated to Pakistan in 1947. Pakistan played her 37th test in 1962 in a span of 10 years. Nevertheless, Pakistan started playing test cricket with a competitive advantage, leveraging India's experience since 1932.


Zimbabwe took 7 years to complete 37 tests and has a reasonable statistics with 3 wins and 19 drawn matches during that period between 1992 and 1999. Recent results have been abysmal with majority of the quality players not playing for the national team due to contract dispute and internal feuds.


Between 1952 and 1971, Bangladesh had been politically and socio-economically ignored by the "central government" of West Pakistan. Bangladesh (then known as East Pakistan), despite being part of Pakistan, saw comparatively insignificant cricket development between 1952 and 1971. Despite winning ICC championship in 1997, Bangladesh did not have the necessary domestic infrastructure to compete internationally until recently. Bangladesh is showing significant promise with the U-15 and U-19 teams. The senior team is relatively competent but still lacks the temperament of applying themselves when it is needed the most and that too will be gained through experience, please keep in mind that the team composition has been relatively volatile and a significant turn around is a negative indicator of organizational development. In that regard, the selection committe needs to show more patience.

As S. Rajesh points out in his opening paragraph: “… the start was much more than any debut side could have bargained for”, However, I think the cricket-crazy country is putting too much pressure on the cricketers way too soon along with the rest of the world. On any given day, Bangladesh has the capability of making any of the test playing nations sweat and Bangladesh has shown that in their matches against Pakistan and West Indies. Issues at hand are Bangladeshi players' patience and shot selections. The fact that Bangladesh on the average is increasingly spending more time on the crease during the first innings of test matches is promising. The comparison of the first 37 tests among all test playing nations do not do justice to Bangladesh as the timeline, frequency, diversity of opponents, durations vary significantly among test playing nations when respective first 37 tests are concerned. We must be patient while asking the players to be patient. I wish the players will be inspired by their second innings performance at Chester le street and only take that memory with them into the Natwest series against Australia and England. All the best wishes to the Tigers! Give us another day besides 1999 world cup and the home series against Zimbabwe and make us very proud- deep inside I firmly believe it is not simply wishful thinking!

Edited on, June 8, 2005, 6:02 AM GMT, by CTazim.
Reason: Spelling, sentence construction etc.

Edited on, June 8, 2005, 6:06 AM GMT, by CTazim.
Reason: end quote

Edited on, June 8, 2005, 6:31 AM GMT, by CTazim.
Reply With Quote

Old June 8, 2005, 12:23 AM
Dhakablues's Avatar
Dhakablues Dhakablues is offline
Cricket Legend
Join Date: December 25, 2004
Location: EverGreen State, USA
Favorite Player: Mashrafee
Posts: 4,280

wow,, fantastic research. This deserves to be sent to a cricket mags or the dailies c
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 12:47 AM
Rabz's Avatar
Rabz Rabz is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
BC - Bangladesh Representative
Join Date: February 28, 2005
Location: Here
Favorite Player: Father of BD Cricket
Posts: 20,542

mate..hats off to you...
great article...well researched and beautifully backed by facts...
you should try sending this to some cric mags or fan websites like english TMS or something...or even may be at cricinfo...
keep it up...
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 01:00 AM
insideedge insideedge is offline
First Class Cricketer
Join Date: July 20, 2004
Posts: 375

How can one say by the above research that Bangladesh is not struggling in test cricket? In a typical test match, Bangladesh gets bowled out for less than 200 runs within two sessions in an innings and loses the match on the fourth morning by the latest by an innings.

If the research shows that other test nations were also doing badly in the beginning, then it is not a reason to feel justified or vindicated in one's poor performance. This does not alter the fact that Bangladesh is struggling in test cricket.
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 01:11 AM
CTazim CTazim is offline
ODI Cricketer
Join Date: January 6, 2005
Posts: 904

Originally posted by insideedge
How can one say by the above research that Bangladesh is not struggling in test cricket? In a typical test match, Bangladesh gets bowled out for less than 200 runs within two sessions in an innings and loses the match on the fourth morning by the latest by an innings.

If the research shows that other test nations were also doing badly in the beginning, then it is not a reason to feel justified or vindicated in one's poor performance. This does not alter the fact that Bangladesh is struggling in test cricket.

If Bangladesh is allowed only to play 3 day Test matches for the first 15 years, I bet we would have better results. Had all the test playing nation played 5 day matches from day 1 of their gaining test status, then I would accept that comparison.

I disagree with you about struggling to a reasonable extent [I know knowing the talent BD can do better], in that regard so is West Indies and at times Pakistan.

Again, our expectation is way too high at this juncture, let us focus on shot selection and patience and we shall overcome in the field and in the media- in t he mean time I will bite my tongue and ignore all nay sayers without being abusive and over attacking


Edited on, June 8, 2005, 6:13 AM GMT, by CTazim.
Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 01:11 AM
RazabQ's Avatar
RazabQ RazabQ is offline
BC Editorial Team
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 11,847

my frriend insideedge, perhaps you are not familiar with the concept of relativity?
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 03:59 AM
amim amim is offline
First Class Cricketer
Join Date: May 13, 2005
Posts: 405

Well I don't know why S Rajesh is after us. Because Bangladesh and India were allies when Bangladesh defeated Pakistan. Did our perceptions change about India since 1971 ?

It seems to me that Indian writers in Cricinfo seems to praise Pakistan's performances so well that it's hard to believe that it's written by Indians. We saw so many examples of that in Pakistan's recent victories. But Indians should not engage into deliberate criticism of our performance all the time. They always tend to belittle our achievements and victories.

Setting all our differences aside, all the other Asian nations should continue their support be it in ICC Meeting or in Cricinfo.

We are only playing Test Cricket for 5 years not 50+ years like India and Pakistan.
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 07:05 AM
BanglaCool BanglaCool is offline
Test Cricketer
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Posts: 1,219

Originally posted by TheWatcher
Hats off to CTazim. He proved that he poses sound knowledge of the history of the game, and also that you can't judge a team just by stats.
That's an idio(mat)ic phrase.
Why do use it?
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 07:06 AM
BanglaCool BanglaCool is offline
Test Cricketer
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Posts: 1,219

I meant the signature of GE BUSH
Reply With Quote
Old June 8, 2005, 07:19 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Cricket Legend
Join Date: September 6, 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,300

Dear CTazim,
I liked your stuff very much.
Did you send it as a feed back by cliking the link "Let us know what you think "? If not, I will suggest you do it. We should not let those nay sayers go unchallenged.
Reply With Quote
Old June 9, 2005, 06:56 AM
Flipper's Avatar
Flipper Flipper is offline
Test Cricketer
Join Date: May 2, 2005
Location: Infinity and beyond
Posts: 1,077


Great work!!!
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket