facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 13, 2005, 12:28 AM
zia's Avatar
zia zia is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: August 7, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 1,067
Default Super-sub, YES or NO?

New super-sub is here. We will taste it for the first time with SL. I want to have an opion poll.

People liking the rule please respond "YES".

If you don't like it then respond "NO".

Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old August 13, 2005, 02:14 AM
Spitfire_x86's Avatar
Spitfire_x86 Spitfire_x86 is offline
Cricket Legend
Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
 
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 7,712

NO.

I hate the super-sub rule
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 13, 2005, 04:28 AM
prasad prasad is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: hindustan
Posts: 452

no.i dont like the split overs rule too.keep it simple.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 13, 2005, 05:04 AM
sleeping_giant sleeping_giant is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 84

Quote:
Originally posted by zia
New super-sub is here. We will taste it for the first time with SL. I want to have an opion poll.

People liking the rule please respond "YES".

If you don't like it then respond "NO".

Yes!
There needs many things more like 'any doubt aganst any out decision by ground umpires' can be reffered to third umpire! Even Third Umpire should be allowed to correct a wrong out decision by the ground umpires!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 13, 2005, 12:43 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,878

I don't know have to wait and see the effect for a year or so then may be i will make my mind on it..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 13, 2005, 01:13 PM
Mahmood's Avatar
Mahmood Mahmood is offline
Administrator
Operations & Administrations
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,809

No, its making the matches one sided (in toss winners favor).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 13, 2005, 03:20 PM
cricketboy's Avatar
cricketboy cricketboy is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 4, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,999

NO

I dont thing it is making the the game more interesting. I never liked the plan in the 1st place. I liked the old-fashionedness when there was 11 players and that was it. It is making the game more complex for new audiences. The 20 over fielding restriction rule is not bad.

Edited on, August 13, 2005, 8:20 PM GMT, by cricketboy.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 13, 2005, 04:03 PM
kalpurush's Avatar
kalpurush kalpurush is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: June 7, 2005
Location: Victoria: Heaven's Earth!
Posts: 19,109

No! It will help the big team a lot than the less strong team like Bangladesh.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 14, 2005, 06:43 AM
battye battye is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 1,151

No, super sub is stupid
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 14, 2005, 02:40 PM
bdmoderator's Avatar
bdmoderator bdmoderator is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: August 30, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Mash,Rafiq,Wasim,Lee,Inzy
Posts: 1,763

No!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 15, 2005, 07:30 AM
be_friend_13 be_friend_13 is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: San Diego
Favorite Player: Tendulkar & Jonty Rhodes
Posts: 266

absolutely not!!
i think its making the game complex n doing nothing gud for the bowlers!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 15, 2005, 07:40 AM
Daddy_Mac Daddy_Mac is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 5, 2005
Posts: 256

Yes! it makes cricket more interesting....
In my openion cricket should have three super sud like football and
become 20-20.....

Edited on, August 15, 2005, 12:41 PM GMT, by Daddy_Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 15, 2005, 10:55 AM
Mahmood's Avatar
Mahmood Mahmood is offline
Administrator
Operations & Administrations
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,809

Quote:
Originally posted by Daddy_Mac
Yes! it makes cricket more interesting....
In my openion cricket should have three super sud like football and
become 20-20.....

Edited on, August 15, 2005, 12:41 PM GMT, by Daddy_Mac.
May be you should give up cricket and start following baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old August 15, 2005, 07:42 PM
sasharif sasharif is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 28, 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 121

SS is a disgust to the team spirit of cricket. Team strength can never be judged by SS system. Haden does not bowl. So, make him SS so that he can bat only and rest during the full fielding peiod so that he is frest to bat? Mcgrath will not be required to improve his batting. This is not cricket.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old August 16, 2005, 12:12 AM
ajithlalm ajithlalm is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 4, 2004
Posts: 299

The team and the sub player should be named after the toss not before the toss... This give lesser advantage to the side which win toss. Not fair.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket